, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp 435–438 | Cite as

Weisberg on Design: What Fine-Tuning’s Got to Do with It

Original Article


Jonathan Weisberg (Analysis, 70(3), pp. 431–438, 2010) argues that, given that life exists, the fact that the universe is fine-tuned for life does not confirm the design hypothesis. And if the fact that life exists confirms the design hypothesis, fine-tuning is irrelevant. So either way, fine-tuning has nothing to do with it. I will defend a design argument that survives Weisberg’s critique—the fact that life exists supports the design hypothesis, but it only does so given fine-tuning.


  1. Bradley, D. J. (2009). Multiple universes and observation selection effects. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46(1), 61–72.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, R. (2003). Evidence for fine-tuning. In N. Manson (Ed.), God, design: The teleological argument, modern science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Hacking, I. (1965). The logic of statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. McMullin, E. (1993). Indifference principle and anthropic principle in cosmology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 359–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rees, M. (1999). Just six numbers. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Weisberg, J. (2010). A note on design: What’s fine-tuning got to do with it? Analysis, 70(3), 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. White. (2011). ‘What fine-tuning’s got to do with it: A reply to Weisberg’. Analysis. doi:10.1093/analys/anr100

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations