Verisimilitude and Belief Revision. With a Focus on the Relevant Element Account
- 143 Downloads
The expansion or revision of false theories by true evidence does not always increase their verisimilitude. After a comparison of different notions of verisimilitude the relation between verisimilitude and belief expansion or revision is investigated within the framework of the relevant element account. We are able to find certain interesting conditions under which both the expansion and the revision of theories by true evidence is guaranteed to increase their verisimilitude.
KeywordsBelief Revision Propositional Variable Relevant Element Conjunctive Part False Theory
For valuable help I am indepted to Theo Kuipers, Erik Olsson, Graham Oddie, Roberto Festa and Gustavo Cevolani.
- Cevolani, G., & Festa, R. (2009). Scientific change, belief dynamics and truth approximation. La Nuova Critica, 51(52), 27–59.Google Scholar
- Cevolani, G., Crupi, V., & Festa, R. (2010). Verisimilitude and belief change for conjunctive theories. In this volume.Google Scholar
- Gärdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hansson, S. O. (1999). A textbook of belief dynamics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Hilpinen, R. (1976). Approximate truth and truthlikeness. In M. Przelecki, et al. (Eds.), Formal methods in the methodology of empirical sciences (pp. 19–42). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Kuipers, T. A. F. (2000). From instrumentalism to constructive realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. (1978). On the distance from the truth as a true distance. In J. Hintikka, et al. (Eds.), Essays on mathematical and philosophical logic (pp. 166–177). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Belief revision and truthlikeness. In B. Hansson et al. (Eds.) Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors. Retrieved February 20, 2009, from http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning.
- Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schurz, G. (1991). Relevant deduction. Erkenntnis, 35, 391–437.Google Scholar
- Schurz, G. (2005). Kuipers’ account to H-D confirmation and truthlikeness. In R. Festa, A. Aliseda, & J. Peijnenburg (Eds.), Confirmation, empirical progress, and truth approximation (pp. 141–159). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- Schurz, G. (2010). Abductive belief revision. In E. Olsson & S. Enqvist (Eds.), Belief revision meets philosophy of science. NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schurz, G., & Weingartner, P. (1987). Verisimilitude defined by relevant consequence-elements. In T. A. Kuipers (Ed.), What is closer-to-the-truth? (pp. 47–78). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar