Erkenntnis

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 101–114

Magicicada, Mathematical Explanation and Mathematical Realism

Original Article

Abstract

Baker (2005) claims to provide an example of mathematical explanation of an empirical phenomenon which leads to ontological commitment to mathematical objects. This is meant to show that the positing of mathematical entities is necessary for satisfactory scientific explanations and thus that the application of mathematics to science can be used, at least in some cases, to support mathematical realism. In this paper I show that the example of explanation Baker considers can actually be given without postulating mathematical objects and thus cannot be used by the mathematical realist. I also show that, despite this, mathematics keeps playing an important methodological role in the explanation and does not reduce to a merely computational or descriptive framework.

References

  1. Baker, A. (2005). Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena? Mind, 114, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, A. (2009). Mathematical explanation in science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 611–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaguer, M. (1996). Towards a nominalization of quantum mechanics. Mind, 105, 209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balaguer, M. (1998). Platonism and ant-Platonism in the philosophy of mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bangu, S. (2008). Inference to the best explanation and mathematical realism. Synthese, 160, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, J. (1985). Synthetic mechanics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 13, p. 379–395.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, J. P. (1991). Synthetic mechanics revisited. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 20, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess, J. P. (1992). Synthetic physics and nominalist realism. In P. Ehrlich & W. C. Savage (Eds.), Philosophical and foundational issues in measurement theory (pp. 119–138). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Colyvan, M. (2001). The indispensability of mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field, H. (1980). Science without numbers. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Field, H. (1984). Can we dispense with space-time? (In P. Asquith, P. & P. Kitcher (Eds.) PSA 1984: Proceedings of the 1985 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol 2: Symposia and Invited Papers (pp. 33–90). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  12. Field, H. (1989). Realism, mathematics and modality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Goles, E., Schulz, O., & Markus, M. (2001). Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model. Complexity, 6, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyon, A., & Colyvan, M. (2008). The explanatory power of phase spaces. Philosophia Mathematica, 16, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malament, D. (1985). Review of Science without numbers: A defense of nominalism by Hartry H. Field. The Journal of Philosophy, 79, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melia, J. (2000). Weaseling away the indispensability argument. Mind, 109, 455–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melia, J. (2002). Response to Colyvan. Mind, 111, 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Putnam, H. (1971). Philosophy of logic. (In H. Putnam, Mathematics, matter and method (pp. 323–357) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Resnik, M. D. (1995). Scientific vs mathematical realism: The indispensability argument. Philosophia Mathematica, 3, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Resnik, M. D. (1997). Mathematics as a science of patterns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Suppes, P. (1972). Finite equal-interval measurement structures. Theoria, 38, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshimura, J. (1997). The evolutionary origins of periodical cicadas during ice ages. American Naturalist, 149, 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of East Anglia, School of PhilosophyNorwich, NorfolkUK

Personalised recommendations