, Volume 69, Issue 2, pp 227–242 | Cite as

The Logical Structure of International Trade Theory

Original Article


In this paper the structuralist approach of theory reconstruction is applied to International Trade Theory. In the basic element the universal laws of the theory are stated and the general concepts are defined in terms of three sets and seven functions. Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage and the Factor Proportions Theory by Heckscher and Ohlin are reconstructed as specialisations of the basic element. Two intratheoretical constraints are formulated in order to ensure the consistency of the theory. A number of empirical studies are shown to be paradigmatic, successful or questionable applications of International Trade Theory. The reconstruction allows the assessment of the theory from a metatheoretical angle and illuminates the logical interdependencies of its components.


  1. Balassa, B. (1963). An empirical demonstration of classical comparative cost theory. Review of Economics and Statistics, 45, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balzer, W. (1982). A logical reconstruction of pure exchange economics. Erkenntnis, 17, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balzer, W. (1985). The proper reconstruction of exchange economics. Erkenntnis, 23, 185–200.Google Scholar
  4. Balzer, W., & Hamminga, B. (Eds). (1989). Philosophy of economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., & Sneed, J. (1987). An architectonic for science: The structurlist program. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., & Sneed, J. (1999). Structuralist knowledge representation: Paradigmatic examples. Rodopi.Google Scholar
  7. Bhagwati, J. (1988). Protectionism. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, H., Leamer, E., & Sveikauskas, L. (1987). Multicountry, multifactor tests of the factor abundance theory. American Economic Review, 77, 791–809.Google Scholar
  9. Chenery, H., & Taylor, L. (1968). Development patterns: Among countries and over time. Review of Economics and Statistics, 50, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chipman, J. (1965). A survey of the theory of international trade: Part I, the classical theory. Econometrica, 33, 477–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Gandolfo, G. (1998). International trade theory and policy. Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Hamminga, B. (1983). Neoclassical theory structure and theory development: An empirical–philosophical case study concerning the theory of international trade. Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Haslinger, F. (1983). A logical reconstruction of pure exchange economics: An alternative view. Erkenntnis, 20, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heckscher, O. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. In H. Ellis & L. Metzler (Eds.), Readings in the theory of international trade. George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Hufbauer, G. (1970). The impact of national characteristics and technology on the commodity composition of trade in manufactured goods. In R. Vernon (Ed.), The technology factor in international trade. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Keesing, D. B. (1966). Labor skills and comparative advantage. American Economic Review, 56, 249–258.Google Scholar
  18. Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2003). International economics: Theory and policy (6th ed.). Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  19. Leamer, E. (1984). Sources of comparative advantage: Theory and evidence. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leontief, W. (1953). Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position re-examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97, 332–349.Google Scholar
  21. MacDougall, G. (1951). British and American exports: A study suggested by the theory of comparative costs, Part I. Economic Journal, 61, 697–724.Google Scholar
  22. Maskus, K., & Stern, R. M. (1981). Determinants of the structure of U.S. foreign trade, 1958–76. Journal of International Economics, 11, 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade (Revised ed., 1967). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Requate, T. (1991). Once again pure exchange economies: A critical view towards the structuralist reconstructions by Balzer and Stegmüller. Erkenntnis, 34, 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ricardo, D. (1817). The principles of political economy and taxation (Revised ed., 1996). Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  26. Stegmüller, W. (1986). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Bd II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Teil H: Realismus und Strukturalismus, Anwendungen: Literaturtheorie, Tauschwirtschaft, Entscheidungstheorie, Neurosentheorie, Kapital- und Mehrwerttheorie. Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., & Spohn, W. (Eds.). (1982). Philosophy of economics: Proceedings of the Symposium held in Munich. Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to logic. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  29. Westermann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik: Ein Lehrbuch zur psychologischen Methodenlehre. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  30. Wood, A. (1994). Give Heckscher and Ohlin a chance! Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Logic, Language and ComputationVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations