Advertisement

Erkenntnis

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 5–23 | Cite as

Non-Cartesian Substance Dualism and the Problem of Mental Causation

  • E. J. Lowe
Article

Abstract

Non-Cartesian substance dualism (NCSD) maintains that persons or selves are distinct from their organic physical bodies and any parts of those bodies. It regards persons as ‘substances’ in their own right, but does not maintain that persons are necessarily separable from their bodies, in the sense of being capable of disembodied existence. In this paper, it is urged that NCSD is better equipped than either Cartesian dualism or standard forms of physicalism to explain the possibility of mental causation. A model of mental causation adopting the NCSD perspective is proposed which, it is argued, is consistent with all that is currently known about the operations of the human central nervous system, including the brain. Physicalism, by contrast, seems ill-equipped to explain the distinctively intentional or teleological character of mental causation, because it effectively reduces all such causation to ‘blind’ physical causation at a neurological level.

Keywords

Bodily Movement Mental Causation Close World Neural Event Human Central Nervous System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowlegdments

I am grateful for comments received when an earlier version of this paper was delivered as a special lecture at the University of München in July 2004. I am also grateful to two referees for their comments on and criticisms of a previous draft and to Wolfram Hinzen for his recommendations for amendments to the penultimate draft.

References

  1. Baker L. R.: 2000, Persons and Bodies Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett J.: 1988, Events and their Names Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Dancy J.: 2000, Practical Rationality Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Deecke L., Scheid P., Kornhuber H. H.: 1969, ‘Distribution of Readiness Potential, Pre-Motion Positivity and Motor Potential of the Human Cerebral Cortex Preceding Voluntary Finger Movements’ Experimental Brain Research 7: 158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Descartes, R.: 1641, ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’, in J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoof, and D. Murdoch (eds.): 1984, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Gendler T. S., Hawthorne J. (eds.): 2002, Conceivability and Possibility Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Hume, D.: 1978, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, (eds.) Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim J.: 2001, ‘Lonely Souls: Causality and Substance Dualism’. In: Corcoran K. J. (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim J.: 1993 ‘The Non-Reductivist’s Troubles with Mental Causation’. In: Heil J., Mele A. (eds.), Mental Causation. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 189–210Google Scholar
  10. Lewis D. K.: 1973, Counterfactuals Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Libet B.: 1985, ‘Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 529–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowe E. J.: 1989, ‘What is a Criterion of Identity?’ Philosophical Quarterly 39: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowe E. J.: 1996, Subjects of Experience Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowe E. J.: 1997, ‘Objects and Criteria of Identity’. in: Hale B., Wright C. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 613–33Google Scholar
  15. Lowe E. J.: 1998, The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Lowe, E. J.: 1999, ‘Self, Agency, and Mental Causation’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, pp. 225–39, reprinted in B. Libet, A. Freeman and K. Sutherland (eds.): 1999, The Volitional Brain: Towards a Neuroscience of Free Will, Imprint Academic, Thorverton, pp. 225–239Google Scholar
  17. Lowe, E. J.: 2000a, ‘Causal Closure Principles and Emergentism’, Philosophy 75(2000), 571–585Google Scholar
  18. Lowe E. J.: 2000b, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Lowe, E.J.: 2001, ‘Identity, Composition, and the Simplicity of the Self’, in K. Corcoran, (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival, pp. 139–158Google Scholar
  20. Lowe E. J.: 2002, A Survey of Metaphysics Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowe E. J.: 2003a, ‘Personal Agency’. In: O’Hear A. (ed.), Minds and Persons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 211–227Google Scholar
  22. Lowe E. J.: 2003b, ‘Physical Causal Closure and the Invisibility of Mental Causation’ In: Walter S., Heckmann H. D. (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. Imprint Academic, Exeter, pp. 137–154Google Scholar
  23. Lowe E. J.: 2006, The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Merricks T.: 1994 ‘A New Objection to A Priori Arguments for Dualism’ American Philosophical Quarterly 31: 80–85Google Scholar
  25. Popper K. R., Eccles J. C.: 1977, The Self and its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Strawson P. F.: 1959, Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations