## Abstract

The word ‘probability’ in ordinary language has two different senses, here called *inductive* and *physical* probability. This paper examines the concept of inductive probability. Attempts to express this concept in other words are shown to be either incorrect or else trivial. In particular, inductive probability is not the same as degree of belief. It is argued that inductive probabilities exist; subjectivist arguments to the contrary are rebutted. Finally, it is argued that inductive probability is an important concept and that it is a mistake to try to replace it with the concept of degree of belief, as is usual today.

## Keywords

Subjective Probability Ordinary Language Total Evidence Physical Probability True Sentence## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Alston W. P. (1985). Concepts of Epistemic Justification.
*The Monist*68(1): 57–89Google Scholar - Bacchus F. (1990). Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Bernardo J. M. and Smith A. F. M. ( 1994). Bayesian Theory. Wiley, Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- Carnap R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- (1972). Probability, Induction and Statistics. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- de Finetti, B.: 1980, ‘Probability: Beware of Falsifications!’, in H. E. Kyburg Jr. and H. E. Smokler (eds.),
*Studies in Subjective Probability*, 2nd edn, Huntington, NY: Krieger, pp. 193–224Google Scholar - (1985). Cambridge Probability Theorists.
*The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies*53(4): 348–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Franklin J. (2001). Resurrecting Logical Probability.
*Erkenntnis*55: 277–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gillies D. (2000). Philosophical Theories of Probability. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Hacking I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Hacking I. (2001). An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Howson C. and Urbach P. (1993). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Open Court, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- Keynes J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- (1980). Studies in Subjective Probability. Krieger, Huntington, NYGoogle Scholar
- Maher P. (1993). Betting on Theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Maher P. (2004). Probability Captures the Logic of Scientific Confirmation. In: Hitchcock, C. R. (eds) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, pp 69–93. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Ramsey, F. P.: 1926, ‘Truth and Probability’, in H. E. Kyburg Jr. and H. E. Smokler (eds),
*Studies in Subjective Probability*, 2nd edn, Huntington, NY: Krieger, pp. 25–52Google Scholar - Roeper P. and Leblanc H. ( 1999). Probability Theory and Probability Logic. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Salmon W. C. (1967). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
- Skyrms B. (1986). Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic. Wadsworth, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
- Suppe F. (1998). Operationalism. In: Craig, E. (eds) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, pp. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar