Advertisement

Disaster management: from a one-sided approach to an inclusive system

  • Kyoo-Man HaEmail author
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Disaster management principles include incident command system, comprehensive emergency management, integration of operations, and redundancy. The article aims to study how these principles have been used by many nations for the ultimate goal of disaster management. The methodology employed is qualitative content analysis. A one-sided approach to disasters means that application or execution of certain principles is not effectively done, whereas all-inclusive system includes successful application and execution of all principles. The key tenet of the article is that a one-sided approach should be changed into an inclusive paradigm. This means involving all principles and stakeholders and evaluating the factors of risks, politics, resources, and time in disaster management. In this regard, developing nations can learn from their experiences and also from developed nations, and in the process, they can achieve this transformation.

Keywords

Disaster management principles Politics Resources management The United States Developing nations 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aitken P, FitzGerald G (2017) Principles of disaster management. Academia. https://nursing.flinders.edu.au/documents/File/Peter%20Aitken,%20Gerry%20Fitzgerald.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2019
  2. Alfred D, Chilton J, Connor D, Deal B, Fountain R, Hensarling J, Klotz L (2015) Preparing for disasters: education and management strategies explored. Nurse Educ Pract 15(1):82–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Nammari F, Alzaghal M (2015) Towards local disaster risk reduction in developing countries: challenges from Jordan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arain F (2015) Knowledge-based approach for sustainable disaster management: empowering emergency response management team. Proc Eng 118:232–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asghar S, Alahakoon D, Churilov L (2006) A comprehensive conceptual model for disaster management. J Hum Assist 1360(0222):1–15Google Scholar
  6. Balkaya C, Casciati F, Casciati S, Faravelli L, Vece M (2015) Real-time identification of disaster areas by an open-access vision-based tool. Adv Eng Softw 88:83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2013) Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Bank for International Settlements, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackburn S (2014) The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica. Geoforum 52:101–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobrowsky PT (2013) Encyclopedia of natural hazards. Springer, NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boin A, Hart P (2003) Public leadership in times of crisis: mission impossible? Public Adm Rev 63(5):544–553.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuny FC (2001) Principles of disaster management lesson 14: Criteria for assessing a program. Prehosp Disaster Med 16(4):303–306.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00043466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elo S, Kyngas H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62(1):107–111.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emergency Management Australia (EMA) (2004) Emergency management in Australia: concepts and principles. EMA, Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2013) Fundamentals of emergency management. Emergency Management Institute, Emmitsburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferbar TL (2016) Comprehensive energy resource management for essential reduction of the total cost. J Mech Eng 62(11):685–694.  https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gall M, Nguyen KH, Cutter Susan L (2015) Integrated research on disaster risk: is it really integrated? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:255–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamdan F (2015) Intensive and extensive disaster risk drivers and interactions with recent trends in global political economy, with special emphasis on rentier states. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14(3):273–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hochrainer-Stigler S, Mechler R, Mochizuki J (2015) A risk management tool for tackling country-wide contingent disasters: a case study on Madagascar. Environ Model Softw 72:44–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IAEM (2019) Official website of IAEM. https://www.iaem.com/. Accessed 6 Aug 2019
  20. International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) (2007) Principles of emergency management. https://www.iaem.com/documents/EMPrinciples091107.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2019
  21. Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Seuring S (2014) Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: a robust model with real world application. Transp Res E 70:225–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanji R, Patel P (2015) Technology in times of disaster: an Indian step towards resource management. Proc Eng 107:73–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lam C, Lin MR, Tsai SH, Chiu WT (2010) A pilot study of citizens’ opinions on the Incident Command System in Taiwan. Disasters 34(2):447–469.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01137.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovreglio R, Ronchi E, Nilsson D (2015) A model of decision-making process during pre-evacuation. Fire Saf J 78:168–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacAskill K, Guthrie P (2014) Multiple interpretations of resilience in disaster risk management. Procedia Econ Finance 18:667–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00989-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Sozialforschung / Forum: Qual Social Res 1(2):Art. 20. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204. Accessed 22 August, 2019
  27. Mirzaee S, Fannon D, Ruth M (2019) A comparison of preference elicitation methods for multi-criteria design decisions about resilient and sustainable buildings. Environ Syst Decis.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09726-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myint, NW, Kaewkungwal, J, Singhasivanon, P, Chaisiri, K, Panjapiyakul, P, Siriwan, P, Mallik, AK, Nyein, SL, Mu, TT (2011) Are there any changes in burden and management of communicable diseases in areas affected by Cyclone Nargis? Conflict Health 5:Article no. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-5-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Fire Agency (NFA) (2019) Official website of NFA (in Korean). https://www.nfa.go.kr/nfa/. Accessed 1 September, 2019
  30. National Governors’ Association (1979) Comprehensive emergency management: a governor’s guide. National Governors’ Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  31. Noran O (2014) Collaborative disaster management: an interdisciplinary approach. Comput Ind 65(6):1032–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norling B (2013) Effective time management in post-disaster reconstruction. 2013 QLD Central Regional Conference, Bundaberg Australia, October 13. https://theyellowcompany.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Effective-Time-Management-in-Post-Disaster-Reconstruction1.pdf. Accessed 9 September, 2019
  33. Nowell B (2017) Redundancy as a strategy in disaster response systems: a pathway to resilience or a recipe for disaster? Contingencies Crisis Manage 25(3):123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) (2015) What is an incident command system? https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/ics/what_is_ics.html. Accessed 12 March, 2019
  35. Park M (2018) California fire explodes in size, is now largest in state history. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/06/us/california-fires/index.html. Accessed 22 May, 2019
  36. Pidgeon N, O’Leary M (2000) Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Saf Sci 34(1/3):15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prater C, Lindell M (2000) Politics of hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards Rev 1(2):73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(73) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prieur M (2012) Ethical principles on disaster risk reduction and people’s resilience. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  39. Queensland Government (2010) Disaster management strategic policy framework. Queensland Government, the State of Queensland.Google Scholar
  40. Rivera C, Tehler H, Wamsler C (2015) Fragmentation in disaster risk management systems: a barrier for integrated planning. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14(4):445–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scolobig A, Prior T, Schroter D, Jorin J, Patt A (2015) Towards people-centered approaches for effective disaster risk management: balancing rhetoric with reality. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:202–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seppanen H, Virrnataus K (2015) Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management. Saf Sci 77:112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheffi Y (2001) Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. Int J Logistics Manag 12(2):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Streeter CL (1991) Redundancy in social systems: implications for warning and evacuation planning. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9(2):167–182Google Scholar
  45. Su X, Zhang M, Bai Q (2015) Dynamic task allocation for heterogeneous agents in disaster environments under time, space, and communication constraints. Comput J 58(8):1776–1791.  https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxu157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sword-Daniels VL, Twigg L, Loughlin SC (2015) Time for change? Applying an inductive timeline tool for a retrospective study of disaster recovery in Montserrat, West Indies. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:125–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thayaparan M, Malalgoda C, Keraminiyage K, Amaratunga D (2014) Disaster management education through higher education—industry collaboration in the built environment. Proc Econ Finance 18:651–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00987-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Waring A (2015) Managerial and non-technical factors in the development of human-created disasters: a review and research agenda. Saf Sci 79:254–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wikoff K (2014) Communication lessons learned from the Indian Ocean tsunami and other natural disasters. Blog at WordPress.com. https://katherinewikoff.com/2014/12/26/communication-lessons-learned-from-the-indian-ocean-tsunami-and-other-natural-disasters/. Accessed 3 Sept 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Policy and ManagementPusan National UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations