Advertisement

Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 379–397 | Cite as

Improving communication resilience for effective disaster relief operations

  • Ekundayo Shittu
  • Geoffrey Parker
  • Nancy Mock
Article
  • 192 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify strategies to improve the resilience of interagency communication between relief organizations and the community when dealing with an emergency. This research draws from frameworks including information theory, organization design, and how the private sector has learned and evolved from the challenges of information flow to provide guidance to disaster relief agencies. During times of emergency, private organizations as well as public authorities must coordinate in real time to create an effective response. When coordination is absent, failure results, as was seen after Hurricane Katrina and the Haiti Earthquake. Using data that the authors collected immediately after these disasters, two case studies of systemic failure are presented to extract lessons that might be used to improve communication resilience through coordination between parties in humanitarian relief operations. Recent emergency response trends are identified, and the paper argues that the persistence of response failures is not surprising, in part because response organizations normally operate independently, and their operations evolve at different rates. As a result, the organizational interfaces that enable rapid integration during a disaster naturally degrade and may be weak or absent. Integrating the literature on information processing theory and organization design with the data from the two case studies, the paper proposes that increasing the resilience of disaster response systems can be achieved by (1) improving the interoperability and information flow across organizational boundaries; (2) increasing the synergies between organizations on adapting new technology such as social media for the coordination of structured and unstructured data for use in decision-making, and (3) increasing the flexibility of relief organizations to use external resources from areas not affected by disasters on an opportunistic basis. The paper concludes by discussing resilience enhancing solutions including boundary spanning investments and argues that effective emergency response does not result from sporadic or intermittent efforts but rather requires sustained investment, continuous monitoring, and data collection.

Keywords

Information theory Organization design Social media Boundary spanning Coordination Emergency response Resilience Communication 

References

  1. Aldrich H, Herker D (1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad Manag Rev 2:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altay N, Labonate M (2014) Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: evidence from Haiti. Disasters  https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altay N, Pal R (2014) Information diffusion among agents: implications for humanitarian operations. Prod Oper Manag 23(6):1015–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antunes D, Palma-Oliveira JM, Linkov I (2017) Enhancing organizational resilience through risk communication: basic guidelines for managers. In: Linkov I, Palma-Oliveira J (eds) Resilience and risk: NATO science for peace and security series C: environmental security. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Balcik B, Beamon B, Krejci C, Muramatsu K, Ramirez M (2010) Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities. Int J Prod Econ 126(1):22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banipal K (2006) Strategic approach to disaster management: lessons learned from hurricane Katrina. Disaster Prev Manag 15(3):484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bechky BA (2006) Gafers, gofers, and grips: role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ Sci 17(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg B, Lune H (2004) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bharosa N, Janssen M (2009) Reconsidering information management roles and capabilities in disaster response decision-making units. In: Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM conference, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharjee A, Lossio R (2011) Evaluation of OCHA response to the Haiti earthquake. Technical report, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsGoogle Scholar
  11. Boin A, McConnell A (2007) Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: the limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. J Conting Crisis Manag 15(1):50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolton MJ, Stolcis GB (2008) Overcoming failure of imagination in crisis management: the complex adaptive system. Innov J 13(3):1–12Google Scholar
  13. Broniatowski DA (2018) Building the tower without climbing it: progress in engineering systems. Syst Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carley KM, Harrald JR (1997) Organizational learning under re: theory and practice. Am Behav Sci 40(3):310–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen J, Chen THY, Vertinsky I, Yumagulova L, Park C (2013) Public–private partnerships for the development of disaster resilient communities. J Conting Crisis Manag 21(3):130–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Comfort LK (1999) Shared risk: complex systems in seismic response. Emerald, BingleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Comfort LK, Siciliano MD, Okada A (2011) Resilience, entropy, and efficiency in crisis management: the January 12, 2010, Haiti earthquake. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 2(3):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Comfort LK, Ko K, Zagorecki A (2004a) Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems the role of information. Am Behav Sci 48(3):295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Comfort LK, Dunn M, Johnson D, Skertich R, Zagorecki A (2004b) Coordination in complex systems: increasing efficiency in disaster mitigation and response. Int J Emerg Manag 2(1/2):62–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crowston K (1997) A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ Sci 8:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Curtis CA (2015) Understanding communication and coordination among government and service organisations after a disaster. Disasters 39(4):611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Curtis CA (2016) Organizational networks in times of crisis: lessons from Katrina. J Conting Crisis Manag 26:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cutter SL, Gall M (2007) Hurricane katrina: a failure of planning or a planned failure. In: Felgentreff C, Glade T (eds) Naturrisken und Sozialkatastrophen. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Day JM (2014) Fostering emergent resilience: the complex adaptive supply network of disaster relief. Int J Prod Res 52(7):1970–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Day JM, Melnyk SA, Larson PD, Davis EW, Whybark DC (2012) Humanitarian and disaster relief supply chains: a matter of life and death. J Supply Chain Manag 48(2):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deluque I, Shittu E, Deason J (2018) Evaluating the reliability of efficient energy technology portfolios. EURO J Decis Process.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-018-0077-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dixon RG (2006) Systems thinking for integrated operations: Introducing a systemic approach to operational art for disaster relief. Technical report, DTIC documentGoogle Scholar
  29. Ediger D, Jiang K, Riedy J, Bader DA, Corley C, Farber R, Reynolds WN (2010) Massive social network analysis: mining twitter for social good. In: 39th international conference on parallel processing (ICPP), IEEE, pp 583–593Google Scholar
  30. FEMA (2005a) FEMA helping families into long-term housing. Technical report, FEMA news release HQ-05-373. https://reliefweb.int/report/united-states-america/usa-fema-helping-families-long-term-housing
  31. FEMA (2005b) Katrina survivors: save receipts for disaster-related expenses. Technical report, FEMA news release 1604–182. https://www.fema.gov/news-release/2005/12/19/katrina-survivors-save-receipts-disaster-related-expenses
  32. Ferris E, Ferro-Ribeiro S (2012) Protecting people in cities: the disturbing case of Haiti. Disasters 36(S1):S43–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fine CH (1999) Clockspeed: winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Fine CH (2000) Clockspeed-base strategies for supply chain design. Prod Oper Manag 9(3):213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Francis R, Bekera B (2014) A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 12:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Galbraith JR (1973) Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  37. Gao H, Barbier G, Goolsby R (2011) Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intell Syst 26(3):10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gaydos J, Luz G (1994) Military participation in emergency humanitarian assistance. Disasters 18(1):48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, HawthorneGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldsteen R, Schorr J (1991) Demanding democracy after three mile island. University Press of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hristidis V, Chen SC, Li T, Luis S, Deng Y (2010) Survey of data management and analysis in disaster situations. J Syst Softw 83(10):1701–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huber G (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Iannella R, Henricksen K (2007) Managing information in the disaster coordination center: lessons and opportunities. In: Van de Walle B, Burghardt P, Nieuwenhuis C (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international ISCRAM conferenceGoogle Scholar
  44. IOB (2011) Assisting earthquake victims: evaluation of Dutch cooperating aid agencies (SHO) support to Haiti in 2010. Technical report, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/countries/haiti/49050164.pdf
  45. James T, Cubano M (2012) DOD and NGOs in Haiti: a successful partnership. World Med Health Policy 4(2):1–6Google Scholar
  46. Lachner J, Hellwagner H (2008) Information and communication systems for mobile emergency response. In: Proceedings of United Information Systems Conference (UNISCON’08). Springer, New York, pp 213–224Google Scholar
  47. Larkin S, Fox-Lent C, Eisenberg DA, Trump BD, Wallace S, Chadderton C, Linkov I (2015) Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environ Sys Decis 35(2):185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Managing differentiation and integration. Organ Environ 2(2):267–274Google Scholar
  49. Linkov I, Palma-Oliveira JM (2017) Resilience and risk: methods and application in environment, cyber and social domains. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Linkov I, Trump BD, Fox-Lent K (2016) Resilience: Approaches to risk analysis and governance, in IRGC, Resource Guide on Resilience, EPFL International Risk Governance Center, Lausanne, v29-07-2016. https://www.irgc.org/riskgovernance/resilience/. Accessed Dec 26 2017
  51. Litman T (2006) Lessons from Katrina and Rita: what major disasters can teach transportation planners. J Transp Eng 132(1):11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu BF, Kim S (2011) How organizations framed the 2009 H1N1 pandemic via social and traditional media: implications for U.S. health communicators. Public Relat Rev 37(3):233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lundin RA, Sderholm A (1995) A theory of the temporary organization. Scand J Manag 11(4):437–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martin K (2006) Independent panel reviewing the impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications networks. Report and Recommendations to the Federal Communications CommissionGoogle Scholar
  55. Mattox KL (2006) Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: role of individuals and collaborative networks in mobilizing/coordinating societal and professional resources for major disasters. Crit Care 10(1):205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McLuhan E (2008) Marshall McLuhan’s theory of communication: the Yegg 1. Glob Media J 1(Inaugural Issue):25Google Scholar
  57. McLuhan E, McLuhan M (2011) Theories of communication. Peter LangGoogle Scholar
  58. Meier P (2012) Crisis mapping in action: how open source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, one map at a time. J Map Geogr Libr 8(2):89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Meier P, Brodock K (2008) Crisis Mapping Kenya’s Election Violence, iRevolution blog. http://irevolution.net/2008/10/23/mappingkenyas-election-violence. Accessed 23 Oct 2008
  60. Miles M, Huberman A (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Mock N, Garfield R (2007) Health tracking for improved humanitarian performance. J Prehospital Dis Med 22(5):377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nolte IM, Boenigk S (2011) Public–nonprofit partnership performance in a disaster context: the case of Haiti. Public Adm 89(4):1385–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Sullivan TL, Kuziemsky CE, Toal-Sullivan D, Corneil W (2013) Unraveling the complexities of disaster management: a framework for critical social infrastructure to promote population health and resilience. Soc Sci Med 93, 238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Olejarski AM, Garnett JL (2010) Coping with Katrina: assessing crisis management behaviours in the big one. J Conting Crisis Manag 18(1):26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parker GG, Anderson EG (2002) From buyer to integrator: the transformation of the supply-chain manager in the vertically disintegrating firm. Prod Oper Manag 11(1):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parker CF, Stern EK, Paglia E, Brown C (2009) Preventable Catastrophe? the hurricane Katrina disaster revisited. J Conting Crisis Manag 17(4):206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. PCCIP (1997) President’s commission on critical infrastructure protection, critical foundations: protecting America’s infrastructures. Technical Report, Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection. https://fas.org/sgp/library/pccip.pdf
  68. Pine JC (2010) The contributions of management theory and practice to emergency management. https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/emt/contributions%20of%20manage.doc
  69. Pyles L, Svistova J, Ahn S, Birkland T (2017) Citizen participation in disaster recovery projects and programmes in rural communities: a comparison of the Haiti earthquake and hurricane Katrina. Disasters.  https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rangan S, Samii R, Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Constructive partnerships: when alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Acad Manag Rev 31(3):738–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rivera JD, Nickels AE (2014) Social capital, community resilience, and faith-based organizations in disaster recovery: a case study of mary queen of Vietnam Catholic Church. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 5(2):178–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Santos JR, Yu KD, Pagsuyoin SA, Tan RR (2014) Time-varying disaster recovery model for interdependent economic systems using hybrid input-output and event tree analysis. Econ Syst Res 26(1):60–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schein EH (1972) Professional education: some new directions. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Schneider B, Bowen DE (2010) Winning the service game. In: Maglio PPP, Kieliszewski CAA, Spohrer JCC (eds) Handbook of service science, service science: research and innovations in the services economy. Springer, New York, pp 31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scholtens A (2008) Controlled collaboration in disaster and crisis management in the Netherlands, history and practice of an overestimated and underestimated concept. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16(4):195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scholtens A, Jorritsma J, Helsloot I (2014) On the need for a paradigm shift in the Dutch command and information system for the acute phase of disasters. J Conting Crisis Manag 22(1):39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scott WR (2008) Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  78. Sellnow T, Seeger M, Ulmer R (2002) Chaos theory, informational needs, and natural disasters. J Appl Commun Res 30(4):269–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. SEPA (2018) Build back better: reimagining and strengthening the power grid of Puerto Rico. Technical Report by Smart Electric Power Alliance (SEPA)Google Scholar
  80. Shittu E (2014) Energy technological change and capacity under uncertainty in learning. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 61(3):406–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shittu E, Baker E (2009) A control model of policy uncertainty and energy R&D investments. Int J Glob Energy Issues 32(4):307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shittu E, Parker G, Jiang X (2015) Energy technology investments in competitive and regulatory environments. Environ Syst Decis 35(4):453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith J (2010) Tufts map steered action amid chaos. The Boston Globe, BostonGoogle Scholar
  84. Starbird K, Palen L (2011) “Voluntweeters”: Self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In: Conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2011). VancouverGoogle Scholar
  85. Sutton J, Palen L, Shklovski I (2008) Backchannels on the front lines: emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. In: Fiedrich F, van de Walle B (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  86. Szajnfarber Z, Gralla E (2017) Qualitative methods for engineering systems: why we need them and how to use them. Syst Eng 20(6):497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. The Economist (2012) Japan after the 3/11 disaster. The death of trust. https://www.economist.com/node/21549917
  88. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. Tomasini RM, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) Humanitarian logistics. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Townsend FF (2006) The federal response to hurricane Katrina. Lessons learned. http://library.stmarytx.edu/acadlib/edocs/katrinawh.pdf
  91. Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am Sociol Rev 61(4):674–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42(1):35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J Oper Res Soc 57(5):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Van Wassenhove LN, Pedraza Martinez AJ (2012) Using OR to adapt supply chain management best practices to humanitarian logistics. Int Trans Oper Res 19(1–2):307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. VanRooyen M (2013) Effective aid: ensuring accountability in humanitarian assistance. Harvard Int Rev 35(2):12Google Scholar
  96. Verma S, Vieweg S, Corvey WJ, Palen L, Martin JH, Palmer M, Schram A, Anderson KM (2011) Natural language processing to the rescue? Extracting “Situational awareness” tweets during mass emergency. Association for the Advancement of Artificial IntelligenceGoogle Scholar
  97. Wachtendorf T (2004) Improvising 9/11: organizational improvisation following the World Trade Center disaster. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of DelawareGoogle Scholar
  98. Waibel A, Steusloff H, Stiefelhagen R, Watson K (2009) Computers in the human interaction loop. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weeks M (2007) Organizing for disaster: lessons from the military. Bus Horiz 50(6):479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Whybark DC, Melnyk SA, Day JM, Davis E (2010) Disaster relief supply chain management: new realities, management challenges, emerging opportunities. Decis Line 41(3):4–7Google Scholar
  101. Womack J, Jones D, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world: based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. Simon & Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. Yates D, Paquette S (2011) Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: a case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int J Inf Manag 31(1):6–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yuan W, Wang J, Qiu F, Chen C, Kang C, Zeng B (2016) Robust optimization-based resilient distribution network planning against natural disasters. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(6):2817–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Management & Systems EngineeringThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  3. 3.Disaster Resilience Leadership AcademyTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations