Advertisement

Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 219–228 | Cite as

Risk management is not enough: a conceptual model for resilience and adaptation-based vulnerability assessments

  • Nicole R. Sikula
  • James W. Mancillas
  • Igor LinkovEmail author
  • John A. McDonagh
Article

Abstract

The US government has focused considerable attention on enhancing our society’s ability to protect critical systems and services from disruptive events. Over the past decade, federal agencies have bolstered their efforts to identify and minimize threats using traditional risk-based approaches such as continuity of operations and disaster risk reduction processes. However, these valuable risk identification and management tools are limited because they rely upon foreseeable factor analyses of steady-state systems with predictable hazard frequencies and severities. In assessing the capability of complex adaptive systems to cope with disruptions, an overemphasis upon engineering resilience through risk management and planning for what is predictable may cloud or detract from our efforts to better understand a system’s emergent capabilities to withstand disruptions that are unforeseeable. This article contends that augmenting traditional risk approaches through the incorporation of methodologies grounded in socio-ecological system (SES) resilience principles offers a potential avenue for improving our agencies’ abilities to assess and manage both known and unknown risks. We offer a notional rationale for broadening our examination of system vulnerabilities and present a conceptual model that combines engineering and SES resilience paradigms to facilitate the identification, assessment, and management of system vulnerabilities. The Military Installation Resilience Assessment model described herein applies risk and resilience principles to evaluate whole systems, focusing on interconnections and their functionality in facilitating response and adaptation.

Keywords

Resilience Engineering Ecology Risk Socio-ecological system Disaster response and recovery Disruption Continuity of operations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the official policies or positions of the US Army Environmental Command, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or any other department or agency of the US government. Permission was granted by the US Army Corps of Engineers to publish this material. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance provided by Mr. James Costin of the US Army Environmental Command and the US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center in the preparation and editing of this article.

References

  1. Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5797):1036–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and… Building, p 393. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=Joh0_7X5DHMC&pgis=1
  3. Bhamra R, Dani S, Burnard K (2011) Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions. Int J Prod Res 49(18):5375–5393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand F, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning (s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol and Soc 12(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/ES-2007-2029.pdf
  5. Burnard K, Bhamra R (2011) Organisational resilience: a conceptual framework for organizational response. Int J Prod Res 49(18):5581–5599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson L, Bassett B, Buehring W, Collins M, Folga S, Haffenden B, Petit F, Phillips J, Verner D, Whitfield R (2012) Resilience: theory and applications. In: Argonne National Laboratory Report, pp 1–64. doi: 10.2172/1044521
  7. Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conklin J (2006) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nystrom M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Executive Order 13636 (2013) Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. 78 FR 11737Google Scholar
  11. Executive Order 13653 (2013) Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change. 78 FR 66817Google Scholar
  12. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16(3):253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Walker B, Bengtsson J, Reid W (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO J Hum Environ 31(5):437–440. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437 Google Scholar
  14. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4): 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/
  15. Garmestani AS, Benson MH (2013) A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. doi: 10.5751/ES-05180-180109 Google Scholar
  16. Grimm V, Wissel G (1997) Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia 109:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Groffman PM, Baron JS, Blett T, Gold AJ, Goodman I, Gunderson LH, Levinson BM, Palmer MA, Paerl HW, Peterson GD, Poff NL, Rejeski DW, Reynolds JF, Turner MG, Weathers KC, Wiens J (2006) Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience-theory to practice. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 31–44Google Scholar
  20. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holling CS, Gunderson LH (2002) Resilience and adaptive cycles. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 25–62Google Scholar
  22. Kerner D, Thomas S (2012) Efficiency and conservation not enough to achieve energy security. In: National Defense Magazine. http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2012/June/Pages/EfficiencyandConservationNotEnoughtoAchieveEnergySecurity.aspx
  23. Kline P (1986) A handbook of test construction: introduction to psychometric design. Methuen, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Linkov I, Eisenberg DA, Plourde K, Seager TP, Allen J, Kott A (2013) Resilience metrics for cyber systems. Environ Syst Decis 33(4):471–476. doi: 10.1007/s10669-013-9485-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Linkov I, Bridges T, Creutzig F, Decker J, Fox-lent C, Kröger W, Thiel-Clemen T (2014) Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Publishing Group 4(6):407–409. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2227 Google Scholar
  26. Malhotra Y (1999) Toward a knowledge ecology for organizational white-waters. Knowl Manag (UK) March 18–21Google Scholar
  27. Martin-Breen P, Anderies JM (2011) Resilience: a literature review. The Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from https://ids.ac.uk
  28. McManus S, Seville E, Brunsdon D, Vargo J (2007) Resilience management: a framework for assessing and improving the resilience of organisations. Resilient Organisations Research Report 2007/01, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  29. Moser SC (2008) Resilience in the Face of Global Climate Change. CARRIGoogle Scholar
  30. National Academy of Sciences (2012) Disaster resilience: a national imperative. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13457
  31. Nunnally JC (1967) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Park J, Seager TP, Rao PSC, Convertino M, Linkov I (2013) Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Anal Off Publ Soc Risk Anal 33(3):356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. PPD 21, Presidential Policy Directive 21 (2013) Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil
  35. PPD 8, Presidential Policy Directive 8 (2011) National Preparedness. http://www.dhs.gov/presidential-policy-directive-8-national-preparedness
  36. Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Resilience Alliance (2010) Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners. Version 2.0. http://www.resalliance.org/3871.php
  38. Roege PE, Collier ZA, Mancillas J, McDonagh JA, Linkov I (2014) Metrics for energy resilience. Energy Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.012i Google Scholar
  39. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Tyler S, Moench M (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim Dev 4(4):311–326. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. UNISDR—United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (2014) Disaster Resilience Scorecard for Cities. Version 1.5Google Scholar
  43. Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker B, Holling C, Carpenter S, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2). ftp://131.252.97.79/Transfer/WetlandsES/Articles/walker_04_socio-ecology_resilience.pdf
  45. Walker B, Gunderson L, Kinzig A, Folke C, Carpenter S, Schultz L (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11//iss1/art13/
  46. Zolli A, Healy AM (2012) Resilience: why things bounce back. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole R. Sikula
    • 1
  • James W. Mancillas
    • 1
  • Igor Linkov
    • 2
    Email author
  • John A. McDonagh
    • 1
  1. 1.US Army Environmental Command, JBSA Fort Sam HoustonSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development CenterConcordUSA

Personalised recommendations