Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 373–377 | Cite as

Does adding more lettuce make a hamburger truly green? A metaphor behind the green movement paradigm in designing cities

  • Abhijit Paul
  • Paul F. Downton
  • Enoch Okoli
  • Jit K. Gupta
  • Mark Tirpak
Perspectives

Abstract

In designing cities, the label of the green movement these days is being applied to almost everything—starting from works of environmental non-governmental organizations and international as well as local conservation organizations to grass-roots resistance activism including radical environmentalism. This paper seeks to understand the motivation—the paradigm—behind the green movement initiatives and how the paradigm appears to shift from the ground reality. Conclusions suggest that, on one hand, environmental problems are far from being a matter of common sense and, on the other, the matter of intellectual and technological developments—the outcomes of rigorous academic research reflected in endless literature predominantly comprising the fields of environmental sociology, environmental anthropology, and conservation psychology—are in reality often found to be dealt with by shallow planning and policy practices without even realizing the big-picture that the paradigm is merely being used as an advertizing tool for making business profit. It is expected that, unless a shift from such negative practices towards a conscious and genuine commitment to proactive environmental stewardship is made, the situation will continue to be exacerbated.

Keywords

Eco-urbanism Urban revitalization Biodiversity Environmental politics Urban fractals 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Ghosh & Downton are reported to have used the lettuce-with-burger comment, which has appeared in Polo (1999, p. 15). The quote goes: “Pseudo-environmental approaches are like adding twice the lettuce to a Big Mac and calling it an eco-burger.”Also, the views reported in this paper are part of a broader and ongoing research effort on greening initiatives in today’s world, that has come up in many urban conferences and professional networks including LinkedIn. Thanks to all, who have supported this discussion, in particular Santosh Ghosh, Center for Built-environment, Calcutta and Pedro Ortiz, Sr. World Bank Consultant, Washington DC for their motivational feedback. Also, the authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers of Environment, Systems and Decisions for their comments in developing this paper. 

References

  1. Alexander D, Tomalty R, Hendler S, Flick K, Tomalty R (1994) Urban policy for sustainable development: taking a wide-angle view. Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnpeg, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee T, Todd W, Bressi P, Enquist J (2002) Is urban design on the right track? In Forum (pp. 81–84), National American Planning Association conference, Urban Design and Preservation Division, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatley T (2000) Green urbanism and the lessons of European cities. In: Green urbanism: learning from European cities. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  4. Beder S (1997) Global spin: the corporate assault on environmentalism. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Birch E, Wachter S (eds) (2008) Urban greening and the green city ideal. In: Growing greener cities: urban sustainability in the twenty-first century. University of Pennsylvania Press, PA, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  6. Calthorpe P (1993) The guiding principles. In: The next American metropolis: ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press, NY, pp 62–71Google Scholar
  7. Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62(3):296–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devuyst D, Hens L, De Lannoy W (eds) (2001) How green is the city? Sustainability assessment and the management of urban environments. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewey J (2012) In: Rogers ML (ed) The public and its problems: an essay in political inquiry. Penn State University Press, PAGoogle Scholar
  10. Downton P (2009) People, places and philosophies. Ecopolis: Architecture and cities for a changing climate, Springer Science and Business Media B V. The Netherlands, Drodrecht, pp 13–39Google Scholar
  11. Fitzgerald J (2010) Sustainability as economic development. Emerald cities: urban sustainability and economic development. Oxford University Press, NY, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  12. Hamilton M, Thekdi S, Jenicek E, Harmon R, Goodsite M, Case M, Karvetski C, Lambert J (2013) Case studies of scenario analysis for adaptive management of natural resource and infrastructure systems. Environ Sys Decis 33(1):89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardi P, Zdan T (eds) (1997) In: Assessing sustainable development: principles and practice. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, ManitobaGoogle Scholar
  14. Heffernan G (2012) A life according to nature: from ancient theoretical ideal to future sustainable practice. Environmentalist 32(3):278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huettmann F (2012) From Europe to North America into the world and atmosphere: a short review of global footprints and their impacts and predictions. Environmentalist 32(3):289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kornberger M, Clegg S (2011) Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030. Strateg Organ 9(2):136–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merad M, Dechy N, Marcel F, Linkov I (2013) Multiple-criteria decision-aiding framework to analyze and assess the governance of sustainability. Environ Sys Decis 33(2):305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) The problem of automobile dependence at the end of the Twentieth Century. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington, pp 27–67Google Scholar
  19. Newman P, Kenworthy J, Vintila P (1995) Can we overcome automobile dependence? Physical planning in an age of urban cynicism. Cities 12(1):53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul A (2011a) Aquaculture in artificially developed wetlands in urban areas: an application of the bivariate relationship between soil and surface water in landscape ecology. J Environ Sci Eng 53(1):135–136Google Scholar
  21. Paul A (2011b) The need of the flexible-planning approach to sustainable urban development: a research frontier. Urban India 31(2):23–31Google Scholar
  22. Paul A (2012) Creating awareness of an evidence-based approach to urban design. J Environ Sci Eng 54(1):175–180Google Scholar
  23. Polo M (1999) Report—environmentally challenged. Can Architect 44(1):14–15Google Scholar
  24. Reboredo F (2013) Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging. Environ Sys Decis 33(2):295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roy R, Chan N (2012) An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis. Environmentalist 32(1):99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rubin C (1998) The green crusade: rethinking the roots of environmentalism. R & L Publishers, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubin V (2008) The root of urban greening movement. In: Birch E, Wachter S (eds) Growing greener cities: urban sustainability in the twenty-first century. University of Pennsylvania Press, PA, pp 187–206Google Scholar
  28. Saltmarsh J (1996) Education for critical citizenship: John Dewey’s contribution to the pedagogy of community service learning. Mich J Community Serv Learn 3(1):13–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhijit Paul
    • 1
  • Paul F. Downton
    • 2
  • Enoch Okoli
    • 3
  • Jit K. Gupta
    • 4
  • Mark Tirpak
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureJadavpur UniversityCalcuttaIndia
  2. 2.Urban Ecology Australia Inc.AdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Avalon Alliance Inc.KelownaCanada
  4. 4.Sahara Prime City Ltd. Chandigarh, India & College of Architecture, IET BhaddalPunjabIndia
  5. 5.Transforming Cultures Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney (UTS)SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations