Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 561–576 | Cite as

Cyber international relations as an integrated system

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize the hitherto separate domains of Cyberspace and International Relations into an integrated socio-technical system that we jointly call the cyber International Relations (Cyber-IR) system and to identify and analyze its emergent properties utilizing the methods common to science and engineering systems adapted here for the social sciences. Our work is an exploration in both theory and methodology. This paper (a) identifies the actors and functions in the core systems, Cyberspace, and IR, (b) disambiguates system boundary, (c) creates a design structure matrix (DSM), a matrix of the interdependencies among functions of actors, (d) analyzes DSM qualitatively to show multiple interdependent and heterogeneous Cyber-IR properties, and (e) analyzes quantitatively the differential importance of core functions as well as the impact of actor attributes on influence in Cyber-IR. This work forms a baseline for further understanding of the nature of the heterogeneous influences of the various actors and the various outcomes that could result from it.

Keywords

Internet Cyberspace International Relations Design structure matrix DSM 

References

  1. Abbate J (1999) Inventing the Internet. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Choucri N (2012) Cyberpolitics in international relations. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Choucri N, Clark DD (2011) Cyberspace and international relations: toward an integrated system (working paper no. 8-25 for ECIR Internal Review). Retrieved from: http://ecir.mit.edu/images/stories/Salience%20of%20Cyberspace%208-25.pdf
  4. Eppinger SD, Browning TR (2012) Design structure matrix methods and applications. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Eriksson J, Giacomello G (2006) The information revolution, security, and international relations: (IR)relevant theory? International Political Science Review 27(3):221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. North RC (1990) War, peace, survival: global politics and conceptual synthesis. Westview Press, Boulder c1990Google Scholar
  7. Pragmatism in International Relations (2002) Millennium Special Issue 31(3). Retrieved from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalRelations/Journals/millenn/abstracts/31-1.aspx
  8. Reardon R, Choucri N (2012) The role of cyberspace in international relations: a view of the literature. Paper prepared for the 2012 ISA Annual Convention, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from: http://ecir.mit.edu/images/stories/Reardon%20and%20Choucri_ISA_2012.pdf
  9. Steward DV (1981) Systems analysis and management: structure, strategy, and design. PBI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2012) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Vaishnav CH (2010) The end of core: should disruptive innovation in telecom invoke discontinuous regulation (PhD Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Waltz K (1959) Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations