Advertisement

Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 323–325 | Cite as

Perspective on multi-scale assets for clean energy technologies in buildings

  • Scott SklarEmail author
Perspectives

Abstract

Optimizing high-value energy efficiency and renewable energy in multi-scale systems that include buildings provides energy savings, energy reliability, indoor health and power quality, among other benefits. These benefits are not easily accounted for in traditional energy budget analysis, and their monetization is not included in typical cost-benefit calculations. Popular belief is that higher use of energy efficiency reduces return on investment (ROI) and that inclusion of renewable energy further reduces ROI. In fact, optimization of higher degrees of energy efficiency with on-site renewable has significantly greater positive economics. This is due to several factors including the aging electric grid—statistically having more and longer electric outages—and extremely poor electric power quality (electric surges, sags and transients) that wreaks havoc on digital equipment. Additionally, weather patterns are becoming more intense, stressing the wired electric system and fuel pipelines. As costs for energy efficiency and renewable energy are reduced and as these systems become more standardized and modular, it is more practical to begin utilizing these advances to increase operational resilience and make energy costs more predictable over longer periods.

Keywords

Zero energy buildings Distributed generation Renewable energy Energy efficiency Sustainable buildings Multi-scale systems 

References

  1. Clark C (2013) Falls Church News-Press. Our man in Arlington. http://fcnp.com/2013/01/09/our-man-in-arlington-9/
  2. Commonwealth of Massachusetts/Energy and Environmental Affairs (2013) Zero net energy buildings (ZNEB). http://www.mass.gov/eea/energy-utilities-clean-tech/energy-efficiency/zero-net-energy-bldgs/
  3. Environmental Leader (2012) Net-zero commercial buildings more affordable than you think. http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/03/08/net-zero-commercial-buildings-more-affordable-than-you-think-reportsays/
  4. Gerdes J (2012) Forbes. Net-zero energy buildings are coming—what about the buildings already standing? http://www.forbes.com/sites/justingerdes/2012/02/28/net-zero-energy-buildings-are-coming-what-about-the-buildingsalready-standing/
  5. PikeResearch (2013) Zero energy buildings. http://www.pikeresearch.com/research/zero-energy-buildings
  6. Pless S, Torcellini P (2010) National renewable energy laboratory. Net-zero energy buildings: a classification system based on renewable energy supply. (Technical Report NREL/TP-550-44586). http://www.nrel.gov/sustainable_nrel/pdfs/44586.pdf
  7. Swallow E (2012) Marshable. 8 Amazing green buildings that break even on energy consumption. http://mashable.com/2012/02/08/zero-energy-home/
  8. Tuscon/Pima County, Arizona (2011) Economic analysis of the Tucson/Pima County Net-Zero Energy Building. Standardhttp://www.pimaxpress.com/documents/green/Net-zero-code-Economic-Benefits-Report.pdf
  9. Zero Energy Commercial Buildings Consortium (2011) Final Report. Next generation technologies barriers & Industry recommendations for commercial buildings. www.greenbuildingfc.com/Home/ViewResearchDoc.aspx?id=40

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Stella Group, Ltd.WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.The George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations