Advertisement

The Environmentalist

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 111–122 | Cite as

Gender, age and subject matter: impact on teachers’ ecological values

Article

Abstract

By means of environmental education, teachers are supposed to intervene in pupils’ awareness and concern of environmental issues. Teachers’ environmental attitudes, however, have rarely been studied. We analysed 367 German pre- and in-service teachers’ environmental attitudes for their structure and socio-economic correlates within the frame of a European project. Thus, we retrieved for adults the two-dimensional model of ecological values (2-MEV) presented for adolescents by Bogner and Wiseman (Sci Educ Int 15(1):27–48, 2004). For the two domains, Preservation and Utilisation, the psychometric structure was confirmed and discriminative correlations with age, gender and teaching subject were unveiled. Further research is needed to deduce the implications for teaching practice.

Keywords

Environmental attitudes E. values  Environmental perception Teachers Student teachers Gender Age 2-MEV model 

References

  1. Blaikie NWH (1992) The nature and origins of ecological world views: an Australian study. Soc Sci Quart 73(1):144–165Google Scholar
  2. Blocker TJ, Eckberg DL (1989) Environmental issues as women’s issues: general concerns and local hazards. Soc Sci Quart 70(3):586–593Google Scholar
  3. Bogner FX (1998) Environmental perception of Irish and Bavarian adolescents. A comparative empirical study. Environmentalist 18:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogner FX (2000) Adolescent environmental perception of Italian and five European non-Mediterranean pupil populations. Fresen Environ Bull 9:570–581Google Scholar
  5. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1997a) Environmental perception of rural and urban pupils. Development of an attitude and behaviour scale. J Environ Psychol 17:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1997b) Environmental perspectives of Danish and Bavarian pupils: towards a methodological framework. Scand J Educ Res 41(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1998) Environmental perception of Swiss and Bavarian pupils: an empirical evaluation. Schweizer Zeitschrift für Soziologie/Swiss J Sociol 24(3):547–566Google Scholar
  8. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1999) Toward measuring adolescent environmental perception. Eur Psychol 4:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (2002) Environmental perception of French and some Western European secondary school students. Eur J Psychol Educ 17:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (2004) Outdoor ecology education and pupils’ environmental perception in preservation and utilisation. Sci Educ Int 15(1):27–48Google Scholar
  11. Bogner FX, Wiseman M (2006) Adolescents’ attitudes towards nature and environment: quantifying the 2-MEV model. Environmentalist 26:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brämer R (2006) Natur obskur—Wie Jugendliche heute Natur erfahren [Nature obscure—how today’s adolescents experience nature]. oekom verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1978) The “New Environmental Paradigm”: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 9:10–19Google Scholar
  14. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) Measuring endorsement of the New Ecolgical Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56(3):425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The nature of attitudes. In: The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  16. Ewert A, Baker D (2001) Standing for where you sit. An exploratory analysis of the relationship between academic major and environment beliefs. Environ Behav 33(5):687–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fransson N, Gärling T (1999) Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J Environ Psychol 19:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gagnon Thompson SC, Barton MA (1994) Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J Environ Psychol 14(2):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell SE, Laska SB (1992) The changing face of the environmental coalition. A research note. Environ Behav 24(1):134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuckartz U, Rheingans-Heintze A, Rädiker S (2007) Klimawandel aus der Sicht der deutschen Bevölkerung [Climate change from the view of the German population] [Electronic Version]. Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland, 2007. Available online at: http://www.umweltbewusstsein.de/deutsch/2006/download/ub2006_klimawandel.pdf
  21. Martin WS, Fruchter B, Mathis WJ (1974) An investigation of the effect of the number of scale intervals on principal components factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 34(3):537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milfont TL, Duckitt J (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: a first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J Environ Psychol 24:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olofsson A, Öhman S (2006) General beliefs and environmental concern. Transatlantic comparisons. Environ Behav 38(6):768–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pettus AM, Frary RB, Teates TG (1978) The attitudes of science and social studies teachers toward environmental issues. J Res Sci Teach 15(5):367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schultz PW, Shriver C, Tabanico JJ, Khazian AM (2004) Implicit connections with nature. J Environ Psychol 24(1):31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schumacher E (1999) Widersprüche—Selbsttäuschungen—Flexibilität? [Inconsistencies—self-deceptions—flexibility?]. Pädagogik 9:36–40Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 50:19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Statistisches Bundesamt (2006) Fast zwei Drittel der Lehrkräfte sind Frauen Pressemitteilung (Vol. 416). © Statistisches Bundesamt, Pressestelle, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  29. Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L (1993) Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ Behav 25(3):322–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stern PC, Dietz T, Guagnano GA (1995a) The New Ecological Paradigm in social-psychological context. Environ Behav 27(6):723–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L, Guagnano GA (1995b) Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J Appl Soc Psychol 25(18):1611–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Liere KD, Dunlap RE (1981) Environmental concern. Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environ Behav 13(6):651–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiseman M, Bogner FX (2003) A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Pers Indiv Differ 34:783–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Didactics of Biology (NWI)University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Education SciencesUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations