Advertisement

The Environmentalist

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 101–110 | Cite as

Role of traditional conservation practice: highlighting the importance of Shivbari sacred grove in biodiversity conservation

  • Vikrant Jaryan
  • Sanjay Kr. UniyalEmail author
  • Gopichand
  • R. D. Singh
  • Brij Lal
  • Amit Kumar
  • Varun Sharma
Article

Abstract

Recognizing the importance of sacred groves in biodiversity conservation and management, and the recent threats to them, the present study was conducted in Shivbari sacred grove of Himachal Pradesh. The study aimed at documenting the floral wealth of Shivbari and promoting plantation of indigenous species in participation with local people. For this, systematic field surveys in different seasons were conducted in Shivbari from April 2005 to November 2009, and liaison was maintained with the local community and temple management authority for gaining insight into the history and problems of Shivbari and initiating plantation activities. A total of 69 flowering plant species were identified inside the grove, which include 14 trees, 9 shrubs, 3 lianas and 43 herbs. This represents almost 2% of the total flowering plant species occurring in the state of Himachal Pradesh. Mallotus philippensis followed by Putranjiva roxburghii was the most dominant tree species. Adhatoda zeylanica was the most common shrub species, while Achyranthes aspera was the most common herb species. The grove harbours 23 plants species that are in high demand in the market, and at the same time also influences the microclimate of the area. The temperature inside the grove was significantly lower than the temperature outside the grove. The recent changes in socio-economic status of the local people and a shift towards market-oriented economy have threatened the survival of Shivbari. However, the deeply held beliefs of the pilgrims, local people and priest offer a ray of hope. During the course of the study, 3,000 plants were planted inside the grove out of which 60% have survived.

Keywords

Biodiversity Conservation Himachal Pradesh Sacred grove Shivbari 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the Director, Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, for facilities and encouragement. Special thanks are due to Mr. Om Parkash for his help in the field. Help and support of the staff of IHBT herbarium is duly acknowledged. The authors also thank Ministry of Environment and Forests for financial support through the IER Programme at GBPIHED, Almora.

References

  1. Annapurna C, Singh JS (2003) Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasiveness: case study of congress grass. Curr Sci 85(2):197–201Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2004) Mawphlang grove: where indigenous faith and old wisdom mingle. The sentinel, GuwahatiGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhagwat SA, Rutte C (2006) Sacred grove; potential for biodiversity management. Front Ecol Environ 4(10):519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhagwat SA, Kushalappa CG, Williams PH, Brown ND (2005a) The role of informal protected areas in maintaining biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India. Ecol Soc 10:8Google Scholar
  5. Bhagwat SA, Kushalappa CG, Williams PH, Brown ND (2005b) A landscape approach to biodiversity conservation of sacred groves in the Western Ghats of India. Conserv Biol 19:1853–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhandary MJ, Chandrashekar KR (2003) Sacred groves of Dakshina Kannada and Udipi districts of Karnataka. Curr Sci 85(120):1655–1656Google Scholar
  7. Chauhan NS (1999) Medicinal & aromatic plants of H. P. Indus Publishing Company, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. Chowdhery HJ (1999) Himachal Pradesh. In: Mudgal V, Hajra PK (eds) Floristic diversity and conservation strategies in India, vol II. Dehradun, pp 845–887Google Scholar
  9. Chowdhery HJ, Wadhwa BM (1984) Flora of Himachal Pradesh, vol 1–3. B.S.I., CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  10. Dabral BG, Subba Rao BK (1969) Interception studies in Sal ((Shorea robusta) and Khair (Acacia catechu) plantations, new forest. Ind For 95:313–323Google Scholar
  11. Das I, Chandana SK (1997) Philautus sanctisilvaticus (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a new frog from the sacred groves of Amarkantak, central India. Hamdryad 22:21–27Google Scholar
  12. Dash SS (2005) Kabi sacred grove of north Sikkim. Curr Sci 89(30):427–428Google Scholar
  13. Down To Earth (2003) Extra- a down to earth supplement on sacred GroveGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell EP, Fuhrer E, Ryan D, Andersson F, Huttl R, Piussi P (2000) European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. For Ecol Manage 132:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta PK (1999) Soil, plant, water and fertilizer analysis. Agrobios (India) pp 14–18Google Scholar
  16. Hach (1988) DR/2000 Spectrophotometer handbook procedure manual. Hac Company, pp 353–356Google Scholar
  17. http://www.monkeyforestubud.com, information downloaded on 03/11/2009
  18. Hughes JD, Chandran MDS (1998) Sacred groves around the earth: an overview. In: Ramakrishnan PS et al (eds) Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. Oxford and IBH publishing Co, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  19. IUCN (2007) World commission on protected areas task force on protected area categories, One of a series of papers for the IUCN Categories Summit, Andalusia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaur H, Sharma M (2004) Flora of Sirmour (Himachal Pradesh). Bishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra DunGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaushik P, Dhiman KA (1999) Medicinal plants and raw drugs of India. Bhishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra DunGoogle Scholar
  22. Lebbie AR, Guries RP (1995) Ethnobotanical value and conservation of sacred grove of the kpaa Mande in Sierra Leone. Econ Bot 49:297–308Google Scholar
  23. Malhotra KC, Gokhale Y, Chatterjee S, Shrivastava S (1999) Sacred grove in India: an overview. National Museum of Mankind, BhopalGoogle Scholar
  24. Malhotra KC, Gokhale Y, Chatterjee S (2001) Cultural and ecological dimensions of sacred groves in India. India National Science Academy and the Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya, New Delhi and Bhopal, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  25. McNeely JA (1990) How conservation strategies contribute to sustainable development. Environ Conserv 17:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich no 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich no 2. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1409–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murari K (2007) Dron Shiv mandir. Shivbari, AmbotaGoogle Scholar
  28. Pandey A, Rao VP (2002) Impact of globalization on culture of sacred: a revival of common, but decay of the traditional institution. Ninth Biennial conference of IASCP, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  29. Purohit A, Vyas KB, Senacha KR (2006) Population dynamics of bats in and around Jodhpur of Great Indian desert. Tigerpaper 33:15–22Google Scholar
  30. Pushpangadan P, Rajendraprasad M, Krishnan RN (1998) Sacred groves of Kerala: a synthesis on the state of art of knowledge. In: Ramakrishnan PS et al (eds) Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. Oxford and IBH publishing Co, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramakrishnan PS (1998) Conserving the sacred for biodiversity: the conceptual framework. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrashekara UM (eds) Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  32. Rastogi RP, Mehrotra BN (1993) Compendium of Indian medicinal plants, Vol. II & III CDRI, Lucknow. Publications & Informations Directorate, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarin YS (2008) Principal crude herbal drugs of India: an illustrated guide to important, largely used and traded medicinal raw materials. Bhishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharda VN (2002) Natural resource management through integrated watershed management. In: Mishra AS, Sharda VN (eds) Short course on agroforestry in relation to NTFT. CSWCRTI, Dehradun, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  35. Sharma BR (2000) Sacred groves and their role in social life in Himachal Himalayas, Abstract, National workshops on community strategies on the management of natural resources, BhopalGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma R (2003) Medicinal plants of India an encyclopedia. Daya Publication House, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh H, Sharma M (2006) Flora of Chamba district (Himachal Pradesh). Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra DunGoogle Scholar
  38. SPSS (1996) SPSS for windows ver 7.5.1Google Scholar
  39. Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for assessment of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:256–259Google Scholar
  40. Tewari DN (1994) A monograph on deodar (Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) G.Don), International Book Distributors, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  41. Wei G, Qui YX, Chen C, Ye Q, Fu CX (2008) Glacial refugia of Ginkgo biloba L. and human impact on its genetic diversity: evidence from chloroplast DNA. J Integr Plant Biol 50(3):368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vikrant Jaryan
    • 1
  • Sanjay Kr. Uniyal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gopichand
    • 1
  • R. D. Singh
    • 1
  • Brij Lal
    • 1
  • Amit Kumar
    • 1
  • Varun Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.Biodiversity DivisionInstitute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, CSIRPalampurIndia

Personalised recommendations