The Environmentalist

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 403–409 | Cite as

Mutual interactions in bioelectromagnetics

  • Tomasz Dlugosz
  • Hubert Trzaska


This paper discusses mutual interactions phenomena especially in the case of Transverse ElectroMagnetic (TEM) cell applications as an exposure system in technical and biomedical studies. In many publications is described problem of influence of an object upon the electromagnetic field (EMF) distribution inside a exposure system while inverse effect—influence of exposure system on tested object is overlooked. The problem plays primary role if a correlation between investigations carried out in an enclosure (e.g. TEM cell) and that in the free space is looked for.


Bioelectromagnetics TEM cell EMF dosimetry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ansoft. Maxwell 2D SV. Simulation software for high performance electronic design. Available from
  2. Chen, K.-M., Guru, B. S., & Nyquist, D. P. (1975). Quantification and measurement of induced fields inside finite biological bodies. Biological effects of electromagnetic waves, USN/URSI annual meeting, Boulder, Colorado, October 20–23, 1975, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
  3. Crawford, M. L. (1974). Generation of standard EM fields using TEM transmission cells. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC-16(4), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dlugosz, T., & Trzaska, H. (2006). Mutual interactions in EMF dosimetry. International conference and COST 281 workshop on emerging EMF-technologies, Potential Sensitive Groups and Health, Graz, Austria, 20–21 April, 2006, (CD proceedings).Google Scholar
  5. Federal Communications Commision. Tissue dielectric properties. Available from
  6. Gajšek, P., Hurt, W. D., Ziriax, J. M., & Mason, P. A. (2001, October). Parametric dependence of SAR on permittivity values in a man model. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 48(10), 1169–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gandhi, O. P., & Okoniewski, M. (2002) Computation of electromagnetic fields in the human body, XXVIIth URSI GA, Maastricht, Netherlands, 17–24 August, 2002 (CD proceedings).Google Scholar
  8. Gandhi, O. P., Sedigh, K., & Beck, G. S. (1975). Distribution of electromagnetic energy deposition in models of a man with frequencies near resonance. Biological effects of electromagnetic waves, USN/URSI annual meeting, Boulder, Colorado, October 20–23, 1975, pp. 44–67.Google Scholar
  9. Grudzinski, E., & Trzaska, H. (2001, October). EMF probes calibration in a waveguide. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 50(5), 1244–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guy, A. W., Johnson, C. C., Lin, J. C., Emery, A. F., & Kraining, K. K. (1973, December) Electromagnetic power deposition in man exposed to HF fields and the associated thermal and physiologic consequences. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, Report SAM-TR-73–13, December 1973.Google Scholar
  11. Leicher-Preka, A., & Ho, H. A. (1975). Dependence of total and distributed absorbed microwave energy upon size and orientation of rat phantoms in waveguide. Biological effects of electromagnetic waves, USN/URSI annual meeting, Boulder, Colorado, October 20–23, 1975, pp. 158–168.Google Scholar
  12. Luebbers, R., & Kunz, K. FDTD99. Available from
  13. Zeland Software. Fidelity. Available from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EM Environment Protection Lab.Technical University of WroclawWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations