Advertisement

The Environmentalist

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 447–451 | Cite as

Could the relief of myofascial and/or low back pain by magnetic fields be explained by their action on trigger points

  • Carlton F. HazlewoodEmail author
  • Marko S. Markov
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

It is well recognized that a trigger point is a functional, rather than an anatomical, entity. It is known that a significant fraction of both acute and chronic pain experience is myofascial in nature. This paper is aimed to discuss the potential of using permanent magnets placed over the trigger points, which are associated with that referred pain, to be a tool for pain relief. This approach is even more important in patients with various disabilities and experiencing chronic sacro-iliac and/or low back pain. It appears that the trigger points represent a plausible physiological/tissue “window” and/or pathways, which allow the magnetic fields to penetrate through physiological barriers, and thus returning injured tissues to the homeostatic state. These “tissue windows” represent physiological “entrance points” for eventual exogenous stimulations, mainly physical by nature, to enter the body. There is evidence that the application of magnetic fields (via permanent magnets) on trigger points is more effective for pain relief as compared to application to other body surface area. The systemic effects at which the results are manifested at sites distant from application area is also considered when discussing effects of magnetic fields applied on trigger points. Ion transport is considered as central to the integrity and proper functioning of nerve excitability and muscle contraction. Any disruption of their normal function would directly and markedly affect human neurosensory and neuromotor performance. Biophysical phenomena associated with modification of ion transport are in the range of weak stimuli. Therefore, electrophysiological changes in the functions of the so-called ion channels, are among the more (perhaps the most) sensitive indicators to detect and quantify physiological effects of electromagnetic fields.

Keywords

Magnetic field therapy Trigger points Pain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abram, S. E., & Yaksh, T. L. (1994). Systemic lidocaine blocks nerve injury-induced hyperalgesia and nociceptor-driven spinal sensitization in the rat. Anesthesiology, 80, 383–391Google Scholar
  2. Barker, D. (1974). The morphology of muscle receptors. In D. Barker, C. C. Hunt, & A. K. McIntyre (Eds.), Muscle receptors. Springer-Verlag Berlin. 310 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, F., & Greenebaum, B. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bassett, C. A. L. (1989). Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 17, 451–529.Google Scholar
  5. Bassett, A. (1994). Therapeutic uses of electric and magnetic fields in orthopedics. In D. O. Carpenter & S. Ayrapetyan (Eds.), Biological effects of electric and magnetic fields—beneficial and harmful effects (Vol. 2, pp. 13–48). Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, R. O. (1990). Cross currents. The perils of electromedicine, the promise of electromedicine. New York, NY: The Putnam Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, R. O., & Selden, G. (1985). The body electric: Electromagnetism and the foundation of life. New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc., p. 364.Google Scholar
  8. Blank, M., & Goodman, R. (2004). A biological guide for electromagnetic safety: The stress response. Bioelectromagnetics, 25, 642–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, D. O., & Ayrapetyan, S. (Eds.). (1994). Biological effects of electric and magnetic fields. Sources and mechanisms (Vol. 1) and Beneficial and harmful effects (Vol. 2). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Devor, M., Govrin-Lippmann, R., & Angelides, K. (1993). Na+channel immunolocalization in peripheral mammalian axons and changes following nerve injury and neuroma formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1976–1992Google Scholar
  11. Dugandzija-Novakovic, S., Koszowski, A. G., Levinson, S. R., & Shrager, P. (1995). Clustering of Na+channels and node of Ranvier formation in remyelinating axons. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 492–503Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, W. V. (1993). Pain control using high-intensity pulsed magnetic stimulation. Bioelectromagnetics, 14, 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. England, J. D., Gamboni, F., Ferguson, M. A., & Levinson, S. R. (1994). Sodium channels accumulate at the tips of injured axons. Muscle Nerve, 17, 593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fawcett, D. W. (1994). Bloom and Fawcett: A textbook of histology. 12th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 964 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Foley-Nolan, D., Barry, C., Coughlan, R. J., O’Connor, P., & Roden, D. (1990). Pulsed high frequency (27 MHz) electromagnetic therapy for persistent neck pain. A double blind, placebo-controlled study of 20 patients. Orthopedics, 13, 445–451.Google Scholar
  16. Foley-Nolan, D., Moore, K., Codd, M., Barry, C., O’Connor, P., & Coughlan, R. J. (1992). Low energy high frequency pulsed electromagnetic therapy for acute whiplash injuries. A double blind randomized controlled study. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 24, 51–59.Google Scholar
  17. Glassman, L. S., McGrath, M. H., & Bassett, C. A. L. (1986). Effect of external pulsing electromagnetic fields on the healing of soft tissue. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 16, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harden, N. R., Remble, T. A., Houle, T. T., Long, J. E., Markov, M.␣S., & Gallizzi, M. A. (2007). Prospective, randomized, single-blind, sham treatment controlled study of the safety and efficacy of an electromagnetic field device for the treatment of chronic low back pain: A pilot study – Pain Practice doi: PRP-2007-0027Google Scholar
  19. Hazlewood, C. F. (2003). Treatment of post-polio pain with a static magnetic field and some notions on mechanism. In M. J. McLean, S. Engstrőm & R. R. Holcomb (Eds.), Magnetotherapy: Potential therapeutic benefits and adverse effects (pp. 191–207). Floating Gallery Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hille, B. (1992). Ionic channels of excitable membranes. Sunderland, MA: SinauerGoogle Scholar
  21. Itoh, M., Montemayor, J. S., Matsumoto, E., Eason, A., Lee, M. H., & Folk, F. S. (1991). Accelerated wound healing of pressure ulcers by pulsed high peak power electromagnetic energy (Diapulse). Decubitus, 4, 29–34.Google Scholar
  22. Markov, M. S. (1995). Electric current and electromagnetic field effects on soft tissue: Implications for wound healing. Wounds, 7, 94–110.Google Scholar
  23. Markov, M. S., Hazlewood, C. F., & Ericsson, A. D. (2004). Systemic effect—a plausible explanation of the benefit of magnetic field therapy: A hypothesis. In 3rd International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF, Kos, Greece, October 4–8, 2004, (pp. 673–682). ISBN 960-233-151-8.Google Scholar
  24. Markov, M. S., & Pilla, A. A. (1995). Electromagnetic field stimulation of soft tissues: Pulsed radio frequency treatment of post-operative pain and edema. Wounds, 7, 143–151.Google Scholar
  25. Mayer, T. G., & Gatchel, R. J. (1988). Introduction and overview of the problem. In T. G. Mayer & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach (pp. 3–15). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  26. McCray, R. E., & Patton, N. J. (1984). Pain relief at trigger points: A comparison of moist heat and shortwave diathermy. JOSPT, 5, 175–178.Google Scholar
  27. McLean M. J., Engstrom S., & Holcomb R. R. (Eds.) (2003). Magnetotherapy: Potential therapeutic benefits and adverse effects. New York: TFG PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Miner, W. K., & Markoll R. (1993). A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 20, 456–460.Google Scholar
  29. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). Possible health effects of exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields. Executive summary (pp. 1–7). Committee on the possible effects of electromagnetic fields on biological systems, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Commission on Life Sciences, and National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nindl, G., Johnson, M. T., Hughes, E. F., & Markov, M. S. (2002). Therapeutic electromagnetic field effects on normal and activated Jurkat cells—International Workshop of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Rhodes, Greece, 7–11 October 2002, (pp. 167–173). ISBN # 960–86733–3-X.Google Scholar
  31. Pfingsten, M., Hildebrandt, J., Leibing, E., Franz, C., & Saur, P. (1997) Effectiveness of a multimodal treatment program for chronic low-back pain. Pain, 73, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pilla, A. A., & Markov, M. S. (1994). Bioeffects of weak electromagnetic fields. Reviews on Environmental Health, 10, 155–169.Google Scholar
  33. Rosch P. J., & Markov, M. S. (Eds.). (2004). Bioelectromagnetic medicine NY: Marcel Dekker, 850 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Sartucci, F., Bonfiglio, L., Del Seppia, c., Luschi, P., Ghione, S., Murri, L., & Papi, F. (1997). Changes in pain perception and pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials in humans produced by exposure to oscillating magnetic fields. Brain Research, 769, 362–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherman, R. A., Robson, L., & Marden, L. A. (1998). Initial exploration of pulsing electromagnetic fields for treatment of migraine. Headache, 38, 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shupak, N. (2003). Therapeutic uses of pulsed magnetic-field exposure: A review. Radio Science Bulletin # 307, 9–32.Google Scholar
  37. Slater, C. R., Lyons, P. R., Walls, T. J., Fawcett, P. R., & Young C. (1992). Structure and function of neuromuscular junctions in the vastus laterails of man. A motor point biopsy study of two groups of patients. Brain, 115, 451–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tanelian, D. L., & Brose, W. G. (1991). Neuropathic pain can be relieved by drugs that are use-dependent sodium channel blockers: lidocaine, carbamazine, and mexiletine. Anesthesiology, 74, 949–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Travell, J. G., & Simons, D. G. (1983). Myofascial pain and dysfunction the trigger point manual: The upper extremities (Vol. 1), published in 1983 and the lower Extremities (Vol. 2), published in 1992. Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  40. Vallbona, C., Hazlewood, C. F., & Jurida, G. (1997). Response of pain to static magnetic fields in postpolio patients: A double-blind pilot study. Archieves of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78, 1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Varcaccio-Garofalo, G., Carriero, C., Loizzo, M. R., Amoruso, S, & Loizzi, P. (1995) Analgesic properties of electromagnetic field therapy in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 22, 350–354.Google Scholar
  42. Worden, M. K., Rahamimoff, R., & Kravitz, E. A. (1994). A voltage-sensitive cation channel present in clusters in lobster skeletal muscle membrane. Journal of Membrane Biology, 141, 167–175Google Scholar
  43. World Health Organization (WHO). (1987a). Magnetic fields. United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, and The International Radiation Protection Association. Environmental Health Criteria 69, pp 25–33, 119–127.Google Scholar
  44. World Health Organization (WHO). (1987b). Magnetic fields health and safety guide. United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, and The International Radiation Protection Association. Health and Safety Guide No. 27. pp 7–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Consultants InternationalHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Research InternationalBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations