The Environmentalist

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 519–523 | Cite as

EEG bioeffects on cochlear deaf from cellular phones

  • J. L. BardasanoEmail author
  • J. Álvarez-Ude
  • I. Gutiérrez
  • M. Raposo
  • R. Goya



This paper aims to provide evidence of an inductive electromagnetic bioeffect on the human brain, which is independent from sound waves and produced by mobile phones, in proximal field, through correlating the EEG data obtained from electrodes placed on both normal and cochlear deaf individuals.


Two groups of subjects are placed under controlled electromagnetic conditions inside a Faraday chamber, 12 healthy and another 12 suffering from cochlear deafness). Each is sitting on a chair, fitted with additional support, and holding a cellular phone 2 cm away form the right auricular, in order to avoid a thermal effect as much as possible. All of them, relaxed and with their eyes closed, are EEG recorded in a basal state with their mobile phones off. Then, each of them is again recorded under the same conditions but with the mobile on and listening to the same conversation. In order to assess the observed EEG changes, a statistical analysis by means of the FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) was carried out.


For both, healthy and cochlear deaf, assimilation or integration of the mobile phone signal by some electrodes is to be found. This is due to the increase of amplitudes for alpha and theta waves, whereas the signal is not integrated in other electrodes. By correlating the spectra of frequencies of corresponding EEG records for the same brain areas, we have not observed significative differences for both groups.


A possible electromagnetic direct inductive, non-thermal, bioeffect on the human brain is observed. This effect is produced by the use of mobile phones and it bears no relation to the sound waves.


Electromagnetic field Bioeffects Electroencephalogram Mobile phone Cochlear deaf 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This project was carried out thanks to the collaboration of Bioelectromagnetism European Foundation (BEF), BIOECODEFENSA 7, L.S. and sponsored by SIEMENS, AG.


  1. Bardasano, J. L., & Elorrieta, J. L. (2000). Bioelectromagnetism, science and health. Madrid: McGraw-Hill, edit. (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  2. Bardasano, J. L., Álvarez-Ude, J., Gutiérrez, I., & Goya, R. (2005). New device against non-thermal effects from mobile telephones. The Environmentalist, 25, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardasano, J. L., Álvarez-Ude, J., Gutiérrez, I., Raposo, M., & Goya, R. (2006). EEG bioeffects on cochlear deaf from cellular phones, (Fisrt Tests), Proceed. Biological Effects of EMFs. 4th International Workshop (pp. 794–800). Crete 16-20 October.Google Scholar
  4. Balmori, A. (2004). Posibles Efectos de las Ondas Electromagnéticas utilizadas en la Telefonía Inalámbrica sobre los Seres vivos. Ardeola, 51(2), 477–490.Google Scholar
  5. Balmori, A. (2005). Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of white storks. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 24, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beasond, R. C., & Semm, P. (2002). Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulus. Neuroscience Letters, 33, 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, C. M., Thomas, A. W., & Prato, F. S. (2004). Resting EEG is affected by exposure to a pulsed ELF magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics, 25, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Croft, R., Chandler, J. L., Burgess, A. P., Barry, R. J., et al. (2002). Acute mobile phone operation affects neural function in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1623–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., Moroni, F., D'Inzeo, G., Bertini, M., & De Gennaro, L. (2005). Is the brain influenced by a phone call? An EEG study of resting wakefulness. Neuroscience Research, 53(3), 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritze, K., Wiessner, C., Custer, N., Sommer, C., et al (1997). Effect of Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) microwave exposure in blood brain barrier permeability in rat. Acta Neuropathologica (Berl), 94, 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galloni, P, Lovisolo, G. A., Mancini, S., Parazzini, M., et al. (2005). Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields exposure on cochlear cells' functionality in rats: Evaluation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Bioelectromagnetics, 26(7), 536–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goya, R. (2007). Electroencephalographic changes in humans due to the use of mobile telephones. Doctoral Thesis. University of Alcalá de Henares, Madrid. (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  13. Hamblin, D. L., Wood, A. W., Croft, R. J., & Stough, C. (2004). Examining the effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM Phones on human event-related potentials and performance during an auditory task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinrikus, H., Bachmann, M., Lass, J., Tomson, R., & Tuulik,V. (2006). Changes caused by Microwave in Human EEG of Individuals. In Action COST-281, Potential Health Effects of Mobile Communication Systems. Graz, 20–21 April.Google Scholar
  15. Hossmann, K. A., & Hermann, D. M. (2003). Effects of electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones on the central nervous system. Bioelectromagnetics, 24, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huber, R., Treyer, V., Borbely, A. A., Schuderer, J., Gottselig, J. M., et al. (2002). Electromagnetic fields, such as those from mobile phones, alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG. Journal of Sleep Research, 11, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutter, H. P., Moshammer, H., Wallner, P., & Kundi, M. (2006). Subjetive symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63, 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kramarenko, A. V., & Tan, U. (2003). Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: A brain mapping study. International Journal of Neuroscience, 113, 1007–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krause, C. M., Haarala, C., Sillanmaki, L., Koivisto, M., et al. (2004). Effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on the EEG during an auditory memory task: A double blind replication study. Bioelectromagnetics, 25, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin, J. C. (2004). Human Electroencephalograms (EEG) and Mobile-phone radiation. Radio Science Bulletein, 308, 52–54.Google Scholar
  21. Loughran, S. P., Wood, A. W., Barton, J. M., Croft, R. J., et al. (2005). The effect of electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones. Neuroreport, 16, 1973–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maby, E., Jaenés, R. L., Faucon, G., Liegeois-Chauvel, C., & De Seze, R. (2005). Effects of GSM signals on auditory evoked responses. Bioelectromagnetics, 26(5), 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mausset-Bonnefont, A. L., Hirbec, H., Bonnefont, X., Privat, A., et al. (2004). Acute exposure to GSM-900 MHz electromagnetic fields induces glial reactivity and biochemical modifications in the rat brain. Neurobiology of Disease, 17, 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nanou, E., Tsiafakis, V., Kapareliotis, E., Papageorgiou, C., Rabavilas, A., & Capsalis, C. (2005). Influence of the interaction of a 900 MHz signal with gender on EEG Energy: Experimental study on the influence of 900 MHz radiation on EEG. The Environmentalist, 26, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Navarro, E. A., Segura, J., Portolés, M., & Gómez-Perretta, C. (2003). The microwave syndrome: A preliminary study in Spain. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 22, 181–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Papageorgiou, C. C., Nanou, E. D., Tsiafakis, V. G., Capsalis, C. N., & Rabavilas, A. D. (2004). Gender related differences on the EEG during a simulated mobile phone signal. Neuroreport, 15(16), 2557–2560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Papageorgiou, C. C., Nanou, E. D., Tsiafakis, V. G., Kapareliotis, E., et al. (2006). Acute mobile phone effects on pre-attentive operation. Neuroscience Letters, 397(1–2), 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramos, V., & Monteagudo, J. L. (2006). Assessment of EM Environment for Home Telemedicine. In International Conference and COST 281 Workshop on Emerging EMF Technologies, Potential Sensitive Groups and Health. Graz, April 20/21.Google Scholar
  29. Rosch, P. J., & Markov, M. S. (2004). Bioelectromagnetic medicine. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc., edit.Google Scholar
  30. Salford, L. G., Brun, A. E., Eberhardt, J. L., Malmgren, L., & Person, B. R. (2003). Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwave from GSM Mobile Phones. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 881–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santini, R., Santini, P., Danze, J. M., LeRuz, P., & Seigne, M. (2003). Survey study of people living in the vecinity of cellular phone base stations. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 22(1), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Szyjkowska, A., Bortkiewicz, A., Szymczak, W., & Makowiec-Dabrowska, T. (2005). Subjective symptoms related to mobile phone use. Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski, 19(112), 529–532. Google Scholar
  33. Westerman, R., & Hocking, B. (2004). Diseases of modern living; Neurological changes associated with mobile phones and radiofrequency radiation in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 361, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Bardasano
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Álvarez-Ude
    • 2
  • I. Gutiérrez
    • 1
  • M. Raposo
    • 2
  • R. Goya
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical SpecialitiesUniversity of AlcaláMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of AlcaláMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations