Environmentalist

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 255–268

The changing face of public concern about pollution in the United States: A case study of New Jersey

Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

National surveys and a survey conducted by the authors in March and April 2004 revealed that the public’s concerns about air, water and land pollution have declined during the last four years in the United States and more specifically in the State of New Jersey. In New Jersey pollution remains a major concern of most residents, even during a period of a war, anxiety about terrorism and the economy. Those most anxious about pollution do not believe that government is doing enough to protect the environment, want to maintain current environmental laws, and are worried about the future. Disproportionately they are African and White Americans, middle income, and college graduates, in other words, part of the American mainstream.

Direct attempts to weaken environmental protection are likely to be resisted by this core of the population, which does not trust current federal, state and local governments to protect the environment. We expect concerns for the environment to continue and yet change as production processes in the United States continue a trend toward pollution prevention, and we wait for the public’s mental models to catch up with this evolving reality.

Keywords

Environmental protection policy Air, water and land pollution Public perspectives 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayres, R.: 1998, Turning Point, Earthscan Pub. London.Google Scholar
  2. Barcott, R.: 2004, ‘Changing the Rules’, The New York Times Magazine, April 4, 39–44(66), 73–77.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, R.: 1990, ‘Some Public Attitudes about Health and the Environment’, Environmental Health Perspectives 86, 261–269.Google Scholar
  4. Bord, R. and O’Connor, R.: 1997, ‘The Gender Gap in Environmental Attitudes: The Case of Perceived Vulnerability to Risk’, Social Science Quarterly 78(4), 830–840.Google Scholar
  5. Bryk, S.W. and Raudenbush, A.S.: 2001, Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, J.: 2002, ‘Public Slightly More Negative than Positive about Quality of the Environment’, Gallup Tuesday Briefing, http://gallup.com/pol1/releases/pro20419.asp. Accessed May 19, 2003.
  7. Chaiken, S.: 1980, ‘Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Clues in Persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conservation Foundation: 1984, State of the Environment: An Assessment at Mid-Decade, Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Crabtree, S.: 2003, ‘Surprising Stats on “Active Environmentalists”, Gallup Poll News Service, http://gallup.com/pol1/tb/religValue/20030408.asp. Accessed May 19, 2003.
  10. Davis, B. and Greer, B.: 1993, Pollution Prevention, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. Duerksen, C.: 1983, Environmental Regulation of Industrial Plant Siting: How to Make It Work Better, Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S.: 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Fallows, J.: 1972, The Water Lords, Bantam Pubs., New York.Google Scholar
  14. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., and Mertz, C.K.: 1994, ‘Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks’, Risk Analysis 14(6), 1101–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallup Organization: 2003, ‘Environment http://gallup.com/ pol1/topics/environmentasp’, Accessed 19, 2003.
  16. Gillespie, M.: 1999, ‘U.S. Public Worries about Toxic Waste, Air and Water Pollution as Key Environmental Threats’ http://gallup.come/pol1/releases/pr990325.asp. Accessed May 19, 2003.
  17. Gilpin, A.: 2000, Environmental Economics, A Critical Overview, Wiley, West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Greenberg, M.: 2004, ‘Is Public Support for Environmental Protection Decreasing’? Environmental Health Perspectives 112(2), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, M.: 2005, ‘Concern About Environmental Pollution: How Much Difference do Race and Ethnicity make?: A New Jersey case study’, Environmental Health Perspectives 113(4), 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, R. and Dunlap, R.: 1992, ‘The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?’ Rural Sociology 57(1), 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahlor, L.A., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R., Neuwirth, K., and Giese, J.: 2003, ‘Studying Heuristic Systematic Processing of Risk Communication’, Risk Analysis 23(2), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J., and Ratick, S.: 1988, ‘The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework’, Risk Analysis 8, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lake, L.: 1983, ‘The Environmental Mandate: Activists and the Electorate’, Political Science Quarterly 98, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landy, M, Roberts, M., and Thomas, S.: 1990, The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Question, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Lave, T. and Lave, L.: 1991, ‘Public Perception of the Risk of Floods: Implications for Communication’, Risk Analysis 11(2), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maddox, J.: 1972, The Doomsday Syndrome, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Marcus, A., Geffen, D., and Sexton, K.: 2002, Reinventing Environmental Regulation, Lessons for Project XL, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Mason, T., McKay, F., Hoover, R., Blot, J.W., Fraumeni, Jr., J.: 1975, Atlas of Cancer Mortality for U.S. Counties, 1950–1969, U.S. Department of HEW, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. McDonough, W. and Braungart, M.: 2002, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Mitchell, R.C.: 1978, ‘The Public Speaks Again: A New Environmental Survey’, Resources 60 September–November, 1–6.Google Scholar
  31. Nye, I., Zelikow, P., and King, D.: 1997, Why People Don’t Trust Government, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Parkes, M., Panelli, R., and Weinstein, P.: 2003, ‘Converging Paradigms for Environmental Health Theory and Practice’, Environmental Health Perspectives 111(5), 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pew Research Center: 1998, Deconstructing Distrust: Americans View Government, Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  34. Portney, P: 1990, Public Policy for Environmental Protection, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  35. Portney, P.: 2000, ‘Environmental Problems and Policy: 2000–2050’, Resources 138(Winter), 6to.Google Scholar
  36. Rogers, G.: 1997, ‘The Dynamics of Risk Perception: How Does Perceived Risk Respond to Events’? Risk Analysis 17(6), 745–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saad, L.: 2003, ‘Environmental Concerns are Down this Earth Day. Gallup Poll’, http://gallup.com/poll.releases/ prO30417.asp. Accessed on May 19, 2003.
  38. Saad, L.: 2004, ‘Environment Not a Pressing Concern’, http://gallup.com/poll. Accessed on April 19, 2004.
  39. Saad, L. and Dunlap, R.: 2000, ‘Americans are Environmentally Friendly, But Issue Not Seen as Urgent Problem’, http://gallup.com/poll/releases/pr000417.asp. Accessed May 19, 2003.
  40. Sexton, K., Marcus, A.A., Easter, K.W., and Burkhardt, T.D.: 1999, Better Environmental Decisions, Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  41. Shrader-Frechette, K.: 1991, Risk and Rationality, University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Slovic, P.: 1993, Perceived Risk, ‘Trust, and Democracy’, Risk Analysis 13, 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S.: 1986, ‘The Psychometric Study of Risk Perception’, in V.T. Covello, J. Menkes, and J. Mumpower (eds.), Risk Evaluation and Management, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Trumbo, C.W. and McComas, K.: 2003, ‘The Function of Credibility in Information Processing for Risk Perception’, Risk Analysis 23(2), 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Liere, K. and Dunlap, R: 1980, ‘The Social Basis of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Empirical Evidence’, Public Opinion Quarterly 44, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaughan, E. and Nordenstam, B.: 1991, ‘The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 22, 29–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public PolicyRutgers UniversityNew Brunswick
  2. 2.Urban Planning and Policy Development at Rutgers University

Personalised recommendations