Advertisement

Environmentalist

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Livestock excreta management through vermicomposting using an epigeic earthworm Eisenia foetida

  • V. K. GargEmail author
  • Y. K. Yadav
  • Aleenjeet Sheoran
  • Subhash Chand
  • Priya Kaushik
Article

Abstract

In India, millions of tones of livestock excreta are produced. Our study explores the potential of an epigeic earthworm Eisenia foetida to compost different livestock excreta (cow, buffalo, horse, donkey, sheep, goat and camel) into value added product (vermicompost) at the laboratory scale. Vermicomposting resulted in lowering of pH, electrical conductivity, potassium and C:N ratio and increase in nitrogen and phosphorus contents. Total K was lower in the final cast than in the initial feed. C:N ratios of the vermicomposts ranged from 16.2 ± 2.17 to 75.4 ± 6.84. Microbial activity measured as dehydrogenase activity in buffalo, donkey and camel wastes increased with time up to day 90. But in sheep and goat wastes, maximum dehydrogenase activity was recorded on day 60 and decreased thereafter. The cocoons and hatchlings production by Eisenia foetida in different excreta were also investigated. The greatest number and biomass of hatchlings was recorded in horse excreta followed by cow, goat and sheep excreta. Thus, cow, horse, sheep and goat excreta show potential as good substrates in vermicomposting using Eisenia foetida, although further research is required to explore the feasibility of use of buffalo, donkey and camel excreta in combination with cow/sheep/goat excreta.

Keywords

Eisenia foetida Livestock excreta Vermicomposting Cocoon C:N ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atiyeh, R.M., Dominguez, J., Subler, S., and Edwards, C.A.: 2000, ‘Changes in Biochemical Properties of Cow Manure During Processing by Earthworms (Eisenia andrei Bouche) and the Effects on Seedling Growth,’ Pedobiologia, 44, 709–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bansal, S. and Kapoor, K.K.: 2000, ‘Vermicomposting of Crop Residues and Cattle Dung with Eisenia foetida,’ Biores. Technol. 73, 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benitez, E., Nogales, R., Elvira, C., Masciandaro, G., and Ceccanti, B.: 1999, ‘Enzyme Activities as Indicators of the Stabilization of Sewage Sludge Composting with Eisenia foetida,’ Biores. Technol. 67, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, R.G.: 1982, ‘Nitrogen Total,’ in: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney, (eds.), Method of Soil Analysis, American Society of agronomy, Madison, pp. 575–624.Google Scholar
  5. Casida Jr., L.E., Klevin, D.A., and Santoro, T.: 1964, ‘Soil Dehydrogenase Activity,’ Soil Sci. 93, 371–376.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, L.P.S. and Griffiths, D.A.: 1988, ‘The Vermicomposting of Pre-Treated Pig Manure,’ Biol. Wastes 24, 57– 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, J.H.: 1983, ‘Review of Composting,’ Process Biochem. 18, 14–15.Google Scholar
  8. Delgado, M., Bigeriego, M., Walter, I., and Calbo, R.: 1995, ‘Use of California Red Worm in Sewage Sludge Transformation,’ Turrialba 45, 33–41.Google Scholar
  9. Datar, M.T., Rao, M.N., and Reddy, S.: 1997, ‘Vermicomposting- a Technological Option for Solid Waste Management’, J. Solid Waste Technol. Mgt. 24(2), 89–93.Google Scholar
  10. Diaz-Burgos, M.A., Ceccanti, B., and Polo, A.: 1992, ‘Monitoring Biochemical Activity during Sewage Sludge Composting,’ Biol. Fertil. Soil 16, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, C.A.: 1988, ‘Breakdown of Animal, Vegetable and Industrial Organic Wastes by Earthworms’, in: C.A. Edwards and E.F. Neuhauser (eds.), Earthworms in Waste and Environmental Management, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, C.A., Dominguez, J., and Neuhauser, E.F.: 1998, ‘Growth and Reproduction of Parionyx excavatus (Perr.) (Megascolecidae) as Factors in Organic Waste Management’, Biol. Fertil. Soils 27, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, C.A. and Lofty, J.R.: 1972, Biology of Earthworms, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  14. Elvira, C., Sampedro, L., Benitez, E., and Nogales, R.: 1998, ‘Vermicomposting of Sludges from Paper Mill and Dairy Industries with Eisenia andrei: A Pilot Scale Study,’ Biores. Technol. 63, 205-211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia, C. Hernandez, T., and Costa, F.: 1997, ‘Potential use of Dehydrogenase Activity as an Index of Microbial Activity in Degraded Soils,’ Commun. Soil Sci. Plant An. 28, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghosh, M., Chattopadhyay, G.N., and Baral, K.: 1999, ‘Transformation of Phosphorus During Vermicomposting,’ Biores. Technol. 69, 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunadi, B. and Edwards, C.A.: 2003, ‘The Effect of Multiple Applications of Different Organic Wastes on the Growth, Fecundity and Survival of Eisenia foetida (Savigny) (Lumbricidae),’ Pedobiologia 47(4), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartenstein, R.: 1981, ‘Production of Earthworms as a Potentially Economic Source of Protein,’ Biotechnol. Bioengg. 23, 1797–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartenstein, R. and Hartenstein, F.: 1981, ‘Physico-Chemical Changes Affected in Activated Sludge by the Earthworm Eisenia foetida,’ J. Environ. Quality 10, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartenstein, R., Neuhauser, E.F., and Kaplan, D.L.: 1979, ‘Reproductive Potential of the Earthworm Eisenia foetida’, Oecologia 43, 329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kale, R.D., Bano, K., and Krishnamoorthy, R.V.: 1982, ‘Potential of Perionyx excavatus for Utilization of Organic Wastes,’ Pedobiologia 23, 419–425.Google Scholar
  22. Kale, R.D.: 2000, ‘An Evaluation of the Vermitechnology Process for the Treatment of Agro, Sugar and Food Processing Wastes,’ Technology Appreciation Programme on Evaluation of Biotechnological Approaches to Waste Management held on 26th October, 2000. Industrial Association-Ship of IIT, Madras, 15–17.Google Scholar
  23. Kaviraj and Sharma, S.: 2003, ‘Municipal Solid Waste Management Through Vermicomposting Employing Exotic and Local Species of Earthworms,’ Biores. Technol 90, 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemppainnen, E.: 1989, ‘Nutrient Content and Fertilizer Value of Live Stick Manure with Special Reference to Cow Manure,’ Ann. Agric. Fenn. 28, 163–284.Google Scholar
  25. Levi-Minzi, R., Riffaldi, R., and Saviozzi, A.: 1986, ‘Organic Matter and Nutrients in Fresh and Mature Farmyard Manure,’ Agricul. Wastes 16, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loh, T.C., Lee, Y.C., Liang, J.B., and Tan, D.: 2004, ‘Vermicomposting of Cattle and Goat Manures by Eisenia foetida and their Growth and Reproduction Performance,’ Biores. Technol. 96, 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell, A.: 1997, ‘Production of Eisenia foetida and Vermicompost from Feedlot Cattle Manure,’ Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 763–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ndegwa, P.M. and Thompson, S.A.: 2001, ‘Integrating Composting and Vermicomposting the Treatment and Bioconversion of Biosolids,’ Biores. Technol. 76, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ndegwa, P.M., Thompson, S.A., and Das, K.C.: 2000, ‘Effects of Stocking Sensity and Feeding Rate on Vermicomposting of Biosolids,’ Biores. Technol. 71, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E.: 1982, ‘Total Carbon and Organic Carbon and Organic Matter,’ in: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (eds.), Method of Soil Analysis, American Society of agronomy, Madison, pp. 539–579.Google Scholar
  31. Orozco, F.H., Cegarra, J., Trujillo, L.M., and Roig, A.: 1996, ‘Vermicomposting of Coffee Pulp using the Earthworm Eisenia foetida: Effects on C and N Contents and the Availability of Nutrients,’ Biol. Fertil. Soil 22, 162–166.Google Scholar
  32. Reinecke, A.J., Viljoen, S.A., and Saayman, R.J.: 1992, ‘The Suitability of Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus and Eisenia foetida (Oligochaeta) for Vermicomposting in Southern Africa in Terms of their Temperature Requirements,’ Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 1295–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabine, J.R.: 1978, ‘The Nutritive Value of Earthworm Meals,’ in: R. Hartenstein (ed.), Utilization of soil organisms in sludge management, Syracuse, State University of New York, pp. 122–130.Google Scholar
  34. Senapati, B.K., Dash, M.C., Rane, A.K., and Panda, B.K.: 1980, ‘Observation on the Effect of Earthworms in the Decomposition Process in Soil Under Laboratory Conditions,’ Comp. Physiol. Ecol. 5, 140–142.Google Scholar
  35. Satchell, J.E. and Martin, K.: 1984, ‘Phosphate Activity in Earthworm Faeces,’ Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senesi, N.: 1989, ‘Composted Materials as Organic Fertilizers,’ The Sci. Total Environ. 81/82, 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tomati, U., Grappelli, A., and Gallii, E.: 1987, ‘The Presence of Growth Regulators in Earthworm-Worked Wastes,’ in: Proceedings of International Symposium on Earthworms, A.M. Bonvicini Paglioi and P. Omodeo (eds.), Unione Zoologica Italiana, 2, Mucchi, Modena, pp. 423–435.Google Scholar
  38. Trevors, J.T.: 1984, ‘Dehydrogenase Activity in Soil,’ A Comparison Between the INT and TTC assay,’ Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 673–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tripathi, G. and Bhardwaj, P.: 2004, ‘Comparative Studies on Biomass Production, Life Cycles and Composting Efficiency of Eisenia foetida (Savigny) and Lampito mauritii (Kinberg),’ Biores Technol. 92, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Viel, M., Sayag, D., and Andre, L.: 1987, ‘Optimization of Agricultural, Industrial Waste Management through In-vessel Composting,’ in: M. de Bertoldi, (ed.), Compost: Production, Quality and Use. Elseiver Appl. Sci. Essex, pp. 230–237.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. K. Garg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Y. K. Yadav
    • 2
  • Aleenjeet Sheoran
    • 1
  • Subhash Chand
    • 1
  • Priya Kaushik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringGuru Jambheshwar UniversityHisarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Processing and EnergyCCS Haryana Agricultural UniversityHisarIndia

Personalised recommendations