Environmentalist

, Volume 25, Issue 2–4, pp 67–74

“Biological Windows”: A Tribute to W. Ross Adey

Article

Summary

We often do not realize how fast the time is running. It is now more than a year since the sad news for the death of William Ross Adey came. With kind agreement of Prof. Kostarakis my presentation at the 3rd International Workshop “Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields” was dedicated to the memory of this remarkable scientist, dear colleague and friend. I would like that this paper will be a tribute to the life and scientific achievements of Dr. Ross Adey. It is astonishing that among all his contributions in the field of Bioelectromagnetics, Dr. Adey introduced the term “window”.

Keywords

biological windows electromagnetic fields myosin phosphorylation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adey, W.R.: 1090, “Frequency and Power Windowing in Tissue Interactions with Weak Electromagnetic Fields,” Proceedings of IEEE 68, 119–125.Google Scholar
  2. Bassett, C.A.L.: 1994, “Therapeutic Uses of Electric and Magnetic Fields in Orthopedics,” in D. Carpenter and S. Ayrapetyan (eds.), Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields, Academic Press, San Diego pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
  3. Bawin, S. and Ross Adey, W.: 1976, “Sensitivity of Calcium Binding in Cerebral Tissues to Weak Environmental Electric Fields Oscillating at Low Frequency,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 1999–2003.Google Scholar
  4. Bawin, S.M., Kaczmarek, L.K. and Ross Adey, W.: 1975, “Effects of Modulated VHF Fields on the Central Nervous System’, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 247, 74–91.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, J.P. and Blackman, C.F.: 1994, “Clarification and Application of an Ion Parametric Resonance Model for Magnetic Field Interactions with Biological Systems,” Bioelectromagnetics 15, 217–231.Google Scholar
  6. Blackman, C.F., Benane, S.G., House, D.E. and Joines, W.T.: 1985, “Effects of ELF (1–120 Hz) and Modulated (50 HZ) RF Fields on the Efflux of Calcium Ions from Brain Tissue in vitro,” Bioelectromagnetics 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
  7. Bull, A.W., Chreng, S., Jernow, K.A. and Liboff, A.R.: 1993, “Weak Magnetostatic Fields Alter Calmodulin-Dependent Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase Activity,” in M. Blank (ed.), Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, San Francisco Press Inc., pp. 319–322.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, P. and Klee, C.B.: 1988, Calmodulin, Elsevier Science Publishing Co, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Eichwald, C. and Walleczek, J.: 2000, “Model for Magnetic field Effects on Radical Pair Recombination in Enzyme Kinetics,” Science 287(5451), 273–278.Google Scholar
  10. Engstrom, S., Markov, M.S., McLean, M.J., Holcomb, R.R. and Markov, J.M.: 2002, “Effects of Non-Uniform Static Magnetic Fields on the Rate of Myosin Phosphorylation,” Bioelectromagnetics 23, 475–479.Google Scholar
  11. Fruen, B.R., Bardy, J.M., Byrem, T.M., Strasburg, G.M. and Louise C.F.: 2000, “Differential Ca2+ Sensitivity of Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Ryanodine Receptors in Presence of Calmodulin,” Am J. Physiol.: Cell Physiol. 279, C724–C733.Google Scholar
  12. Gromadzinska, E., Lachowitz, L., Walkowiak, B. and Zylinska, L.L.: 2001, “Calmodulin Effect on Purified Rat Cortical Plasma Membrane Ca2+—ATPase in Different Phosphorylated States,” BBA, 1549, 19–31.Google Scholar
  13. Inagaki, N., Nishizawa, M., Arimura, N., Yamamoto, H., Takeushi, Y., Miyamoto, E., Kaibuchi, K. and Inagaki M, M.: 2000, “Activation of Ca2+/Calmodulin Dependent Protein Kinase II Within Post-Synaptic Dendritic Spines of Cultured Hippocampal Neurons,” Journal Biological Chemistry 275, #35, 27165–27171.Google Scholar
  14. Lednev, V.V.: 1991, “Possible Mechanism for the Influence of Weak Magnetic Field Interactions with Biological Systems,” Bioelectromagnetics 12, 71–75.Google Scholar
  15. Liboff, A.R.: 1985, “Cyclotron Resonance in Membrane Transport” in A. Chiabrera, C. Nicolini and H.P. Schwan (eds.), Interactions Between Electromagnetic Fields and Cells, London, Plenum Press, pp. 281–290.Google Scholar
  16. Liboff, A.R., Cherng, S., Jenrow, K.A. and Bull, A.: 2003, “Calmodulin-Dependent Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase Activity is Altered by 20 μT Magnetostatic Fields,” Bioelectromagnetics 24, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Markov, M.S.: 1979, “Informational Character of Magnetic Field Action on Biological Systems,” in Yu. Vassileva and K. Jensen (eds.), Biophysical and Biochemical Information Transfer in Recognition, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 496–500.Google Scholar
  18. Markov, M.S.: 1984, “Influence of constant magnetic field on biological systems’, in M.J. Allen and P.N.R. Usherwood (eds.), Charge and Field Effects in Biological Systems, Abacus Press, Kent, England, pp. 319–329.Google Scholar
  19. Markov, M.S.: 1989, “Effect of Radiation on Biological Systems,” in M.J. Allen, S.F. Cleary and F. Howkridge (eds.), Charge and Field Effects in Biosystems, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 241–250.Google Scholar
  20. Markov, M.S.: 1991, “Electromagnetic Field Influence on Membranes,” in M. Bender (ed), Interfacial Phenomena in Biological System, Marcel Dekker, pp. 171–192.Google Scholar
  21. Markov, M.S., Todorov, S.I. and Ratcheva, M.R.: 1976, “Biomagnetic Effects of the Constant Magnetic field action on water and physiological activity“, in K. Jensen and Yu. Vassileva (eds.), Physical Bases of Biological Information Transfer, pp. 441–445.Google Scholar
  22. Markov, M.S.: 1987, “Electromagnetic Field Influence on Synthesis of Proteins in Yeasts,” Studia Biophysica 119, 105–108.Google Scholar
  23. Markov, M.S.: 1994, “Biological Effects of Extremely low Frequency Magnetic Fields,” in S. Ueno (ed.), Biomagnetic Stimulation, pp. 91–102.Google Scholar
  24. Markov, M.S. and Pilla, A.A.: 1997, “Weak Static Field Modulation of Myosin Phosphorylation in a Cell-Free Preparation: Calcium Dependence,” Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 43, 233–238.Google Scholar
  25. Markov, M.S. and Pilla, A.A.: 1994, “Static Magnetic Field Modulation of Myosin Phosphorylation: Calcium Dependence in Two Enzyme Preparations,” Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 35, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Markov, M.S., Wang, S. and Pilla, A.A.: 1993, “Effects of Weak Low Frequency Sinusoidal and dc Magnetic Fields on Myosin Phosphorylation in a Cell-Free Preparation,” Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 30, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markov, M.S. and Pilla, A.A.: 1994a, “Modulation of Cell-Free Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation with Weak Low Frequency and Static Magnetic Fields,” A.H. Frey (ed.), On the Nature of Electromagnetic Field Interactions with Biological Systems, R.G. Landers Co. Austin TX, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
  28. Markov, M.S.: 2002, “How to go to magnetic field therapy?” International Workshop of Biological effects of Electromagnetic fields, Rhodes, Greece, 7–11 October 2002, ISBN #960-86733-3-X. 5–15.Google Scholar
  29. Markov, M.S. and Todorov, N.G.: 1984, “Electromagnetic Field Stimulation of Some Physiological Properties,” Studia Biophysica 99, 151–156.Google Scholar
  30. Markov, M.S.: 2004, “Myosin Phosphorylation—A Plausible Tool for Studying Biological Windows,” Proceedings of 3rd International workshop “Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Kos, Greece, 4–8 October 2004, ISBN 960-233-151-8, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  31. Mariotti, M., De Benedictis, L., Avon, E. and Maier, J.A.M.: 2000, “Interaction Between Endothelial Differentiation-Related Factor-1 and Calmodulin in vitro and in vivo,” Journal Biological Chemistry 275#31, 24047–24051.Google Scholar
  32. Nindl, G., Johnson, M.T., Hughes, E.F. and Markov, M.S.: 2002, “Therapeutic Electromagnetic Field Effects on Normal and Activated Jurkat Cells,” International Workshop of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Rhodes, Greece, 7–11 October 2002, ISBN # 960-86733-3-X., pp. 167–173.Google Scholar
  33. Pilla, A.A. and Markov, M.S.: 1994, “Weak Electromagnetic Field Bioeffects’, Review of Environmental Health 10, 155–169.Google Scholar
  34. Ross Adey, W.: 1975, “Evidence for Cooperative Mechanisms in the Susceptibility of Cerebral Tissue to Environmental and Intrinsic Electric Field,” in F. Schmitt, D.M. Schneider, and D.M. Ctithers (eds.), Functional Linkage in Biomolecular Systems, Raven Press, New York, pp. 325–342.Google Scholar
  35. Ross Adey, W.: 1977, “Model of Cerebral Cells as Substrates for Informational Storage,” Biosystems 8, 163–176.Google Scholar
  36. Ross Adey, W.: 1986, “The Sequence and Energetics of Cell Membrane Coupling to Intracellular Enzyme Systems’, Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 15, 447–454.Google Scholar
  37. Ross Adey, W.: 1989, “The Extracellular Space and Energetic Hierarchies in Electrochemical Signaling between Cells” in M.J. Allen, S.F. Cleary, and F. Howkridge (eds.), Charge and Field Effects in Biosystems, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 263–290.Google Scholar
  38. Shuvalova, L.A., Ostrovskaya, M.V., Sosunov, E.A. and Lednev, V.V.: 1991, “Weak Magnetic Fields Tuned to the Parametric Resonance Condition Change the Rate of Calcium—Calmodulin Dependent Myosin Phosphorylation,” Dokladi of the Academy of Sciences, USSR 317, 227–231.Google Scholar
  39. Ukolova M.A., Kvakina E.B. and Garkavi L.H.: 1975, “Stages of Magnetic Field Action—Problems of Action Magnetic Fields on Biological Systems,” Moscow, Nauka 1, 57–71.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, C.D. and Markov, M.S.: 2001, “Therapeutic Electromagnetic Field Effects on Angiogenesis During Tumor Growth: A Pilot Study,” Electro- and magnetobiology 20(3), 323–329.Google Scholar
  41. Wu, Y. and Hamilton, S.L.: 1988, “Functional Interactions of Cytoplasmic Domains of the Skeletal Muscle Ca2+Release Channel,” Trends Cardiovascular Med. 8, 312–319.Google Scholar
  42. Zukov, B.N.: 1999, “Electromagnetic Fields: Biological Effects and Hygienic Standardization,” WHO, Geneva 305–324.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research InternationalBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations