Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of spatial (in)equality of urban facilities in Tehran: an integration of spatial accessibility

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The urban expansion and growth of Tehran have caused many challenges and issues for the city, which has been shown in the form of spatial–social balances with informal expressions, weakness of local governments, biological pollution, etc. The lack of balance in urban service facilities has led to a significant gap in different parts of the city. In this research, main providers of urban facilities concerning spatial inequality were used. The results of this study, using spatial statistics methods and fuzzy logic, showed that the propellants of the city of Tehran are distributed in three ways: cluster, random, and disperse. Hospitals, police stations, subway lines, local governments, and gas stations are clustered. Fire stations, Red Crescent, food and wholesale centers, medical services, housing prices, bus terminals, and hotels are random. Ambulance services and sports clubs are dispersed. These ways of distribution have resulted in a significant difference in the use of services provided by residents of different regions and have contributed to unequal opportunities for citizens in the use of facilities. Deprived districts represent the fact that the urban population is growing faster than the necessary infrastructure which can be built by urban management. The least developed and underdeveloped areas are mostly in the south and southeast of Tehran city, the medium and relatively developed areas are located in the center and west of the city, and the developed areas are located in the north of the city. Findings in this paper are trying to provide main criteria and the results to have a rational assessment of the current situation in the city to solve problems to urban managers and planners, as well as policy and planning strategy for urban development programs to achieve urban sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. US dollar equals 30,220 IRR of government (official) currency in 2016 (CBI, 2016).

References

  • Adewoyin, Y. (2017). Health, spatial justice and regional planning in Nigeria health, spatial justice and regional planning in Nigeria. In G.C. Emenike & T.C. Nzeadibe (Eds.), Readings in human geography edition. Project: Urban HealthShuk, University of Port Harcourt Press.

  • Ali, S., Xu, H., Ahmed, W., Ahmad, N., & Solangi, Y. A. (2019a). Metro design and heritage sustainability: Conflict analysis using attitude based on options in the graph model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 3839–3860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., Xu, H., Xu, P., & Ahmed, W. (2019b). Evolutional attitude based on option prioritization for conflict analysis of urban transport planning in Pakistan. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 28(3), 356–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, G. A., Benassi, F., Mantuano, M., & Prisco, M. R. (2019). In search of spatial justice. Towards a conceptual and operative framework for the analysis of inter-and intra-urban inequalities using a geo-demographic approach. The case of Italy. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (2005). Why social justice matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C. (2002). Urban science education studies: A commitment to equity, social justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, R. D., & Mier, R. (1993). Theories of local economic development: Perspectives from across the disciplines. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacksell, M. (1990). Social justice and access to legal services: A geographical perspective. Geoforum, 21(4), 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostancı, B., & Erdem, N. (2020). Investigating the satisfaction of citizens in municipality services using fuzzy modelling. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, 100754.

  • Brinegar, S., & Leonard, J. (2008). Poverty and affluence: A comparative analysis of economic segregation in metropolitan Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus, Ohio, 1970–2000. Urban Geography, 29(6), 581–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. M. (2019). The advantages of comparative LISA techniques in spatial inequality research: Evidence from poverty change in the United States. Spatial Demography, 7(2–3), 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. M., Flemsæter, F., & Rønningen, K. (2019). More-than-human geographies of property: Moving towards spatial justice with response-ability. Geoforum, 99, 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulti, D. T., Bedada, T. B., & Diriba, L. G. (2019). Analyzing spatial distribution and accessibility of primary schools in Bishoftu Town, Ethiopia. Spatial Information Research, 27(2), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiers, T., & Kesteloot, C. (2012). Socio-spatial inequalities and social cohesion in European cities. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1909–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBI. (2016). Foreign exchange rates. Certral Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Retrieved 14, March 2016 from https://www.cbi.ir/exrates/rates_en.aspx

  • Chang, Z., Chen, J., Li, W., & Li, X. (2019). Public transportation and the spatial inequality of urban park accessibility: New evidence from Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 76, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadashpoor, H., Rostami, F., & Alizadeh, B. (2016). Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for identifying spatial inequity in an Iranian city. Cities, 52, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, K. J. (1993). Elements of urban management. The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikeç, M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and Planning A, 33(10), 1785–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufaux, F., Gervais-Lambony, P., Lehman-Frisch, S., & Moreau, S. (2009). Birth announcement. Justice Spatial/Spatial Justice, 1, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. T., Kawachi, I., Kum, S., Aldstadt, J., Piras, G., Matthews, S. A., Arbia, G., Castro, M. C., White, K., & Williams, D. R. (2014). A spatially explicit approach to the study of socio-demographic inequality in the spatial distribution of trees across Boston neighborhoods. Spatial Demography, 2(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, T. (2019). Transit justice as spatial justice: Learning from activists. Mobilities, 14(5), 665–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2005). Cities and diversity: Should we want it? Can we plan for it? Urban Affairs Review, 41(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2009). Planning and the just city Searching for the just city (pp. 39–59). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2014). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the" postsocialist" condition. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G., & Cutsinger, J. (2007). Racial settlement and metropolitan land-use patterns: Does sprawl abet black-white segregation? Urban Geography, 28(6), 516–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaedrahmati, S., Khademalhoosini, A., & Tahmasebi, F. (2018). Spatial analysis of social justice in city of Isfahan, Iran. Annals of GIS, 24(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, R. C. L. (2019). Urban justice. In The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of urban and regional studies. A.M. Orum (Ed.). (pp. 1–6). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0373.

  • Greer, J. R. (2002). Equity in the spatial distribution of municipal services: How to operationalize the concepts and institutionalize a program, Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.

  • Griffin, T. (2015). Defining the just city beyond black and white. The Just City Essays, 1, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1987). Flexible accumulation through urbanization: Reflections on ‘post-modernism’in the American city. Antipode, 19(3), 260–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1992). Social justice, postmodernism and the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. The City Reader, 6(1), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2010). Social justice and the city (Vol. 1). University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., Merry, A. H., Royle, L., Campbell, M. P., & Rudd, P. M. (1996). Justice, nature & the geography of difference. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbling, J., Kälin, W., & Nobirabo, P. (2015). Access to justice, impunity and legal pluralism in Kenya. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(2), 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewko, J., Smoyer-Tomic, K. E., & Hodgson, M. J. (2002). Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: does aggregation error matter?. Environment and Planning A, 34(7), 1185–1206.

  • Hosseini, A., Pourahmad, A., & Pajoohan, M. (2015). Assessment of institutions in sustainable urban-management effects on sustainable development of Tehran: Learning from a developing country. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(2), 05015009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, A., Pourahmad, A., Ayashi, A., Tzeng, G. H., Banaitis, A., & Pourahmad, A. (2021). Improving the urban heritage based on a tourism risk assessment using a hybrid fuzzy MADM method: The case study of Tehran's central district. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 1–21. In press

  • Iveson, K. (2011). Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city. City, 15(2), 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (2017). Constructing justice for existing practice: Rawls and the status quo John Rawls (pp. 69–104). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1122–1165). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaphle, I. (2006). Evaluating people’s accessibility to public parks using Geographic Information Systems: A case study in Ames, Thesis in Community and Regional Planning. Iowa, Iowa State University, USA.

  • Krumholz, N. (2011). Making equity planning work: Leadership in the public sector. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz, N., & Clavel, P. (1994). Reinventing cities: Equity planners tell their stories. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H., & Nolla, M. (1972). La revolución urbana. Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (2013). Sense of place and place-based activism in the neoliberal city: The case of ‘weird’resistance. City, 17(1), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (1998). Tehran: The making of a metropolis. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (1999). City profile: Tehran. Cities, 16(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, B., Parnell, A. M., & Joyner, A. M. (2010). Institutionalization of racial inequality in local political geographies. Urban Geography, 31(5), 691–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, J. (2009). The use of GIS and indicators to monitor intra-urban inequalities. A case study in Rosario, Argentina. Habitat International, 33(4), 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, H. (2002). Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, D., Noble, M., & Wright, G. (2016). Developing a spatial measure of exposure to socio-economic inequality in South Africa. South African Geographical Journal, 98(2), 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, M. L., & Otero, G. (2018). Neighbourhood conflicts, socio-spatial inequalities, and residential stigmatisation in Santiago, Chile. Cities, 74, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Q. (2018). Fracking equity: A spatial justice analysis prototype. Land Use Policy, 70, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrett, C. D. (2004). Social justice: What is it? Why teach it? Journal of Geography, 103(3), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and Tehran Municipality. (2006). The report of the strategic-structural development plan of Tehran. Tehran Municipality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B., & Mössner, S. (2020). Urban sustainability and counter-sustainability: Spatial contradictions and conflicts in policy and governance in the Freiburg and Calgary metropolitan regions. Urban Studies, 57(11), 2241–2262.

  • Morais, P., & Camanho, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of performance of European cities with the aim to promote quality of life improvements. Omega, 39(4), 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullick, M. R. A., Tanim, A. H., & Islam, S. S. (2019). Coastal vulnerability analysis of Bangladesh coast using fuzzy logic based geospatial techniques. Ocean & Coastal Management, 174, 154–169.

  • Niranjan, R. (2020). Spatial inequality in human development in India—A case study of Karnataka. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, A. (2018). Inequality and interconnectivity: Urban spaces of justice in Mexico. Geoforum, 89, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Moya, F. (2018). Green growth strategies in a shrinking city: Tackling urban revitalization through environmental justice in Kitakyushu City, Japan. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perucca, G., Piacenza, M., & Turati, G. (2019). Spatial inequality in access to healthcare: Evidence from an Italian Alpine region. Regional Studies, 53(4), 478–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2014a). Spatial justice: Body, lawscape, atmosphere. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2014). The movement of spatial justice. Mondi Migranti. https://doi.org/10.3280/MM2014-001001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piroozfar, R. (2012). Fuzzy Logic: A Rule-Based Approach, in Search of a Justified Decision-Making Process in Urban Planning. Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin.

  • Pogge, T. W. M., & Pogge, T. W. (2007). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiei-Dastjerdi, H., Matthews, S. A., & Ardalan, A. (2018). Measuring spatial accessibility to urban facilities and services in Tehran. Spatial Demography, 6(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, K., Berland, A., & Herrmann, D. L. (2018). Green, but not just? Rethinking environmental justice indicators in shrinking cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 816–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran (2016). Statistical yearbook 2016. Markaz-e Amar Iran, Tehran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Q., & Dorling, D. (2020). Growing socio-spatial inequality in neo-liberal times? Comparing Beijing and London. Applied Geography, 115, 102139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M. (1977). Human geography: A welfare approach. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M. (1995). Geography, social justice and the new South Africa. South African Geographical Journal, 77(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, S. W. (2016). Urban green space accessibility and environmental justice: A gis-based analysis in the city of Phoenix, Arizona, A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the USC Graduate School, University of Southern California, USA.

  • Soja, E. W. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2013). Seeking spatial justice (Vol. 16). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J., Norman, P., Thomas, C., & Surridge, P. (2010). Spatial and social disparities Spatial and Social Disparities (pp. 1–15). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulemana, I., Nketiah-Amponsah, E., Codjoe, E. A., & Andoh, J. A. N. (2019). Urbanization and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 101544.

  • Sun, C., Cheng, J., Lin, A., & Peng, M. (2018). Gated university campus and its implications for socio-spatial inequality: Evidence from students’ accessibility to local public transport. Habitat International, 80, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G. J., & Nancarrow, B. E. (2001). Social justice and environmental management: An introduction. Social Justice Research, 14(4), 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E., & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4), 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. M. (2006). Teaching planning history as a path to social justice. Journal of Planning History, 5(4), 314–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F. and Joerin, F. (2005), Modelling accessibility to urban services using fuzzy logic: A comparative analysis of two methods, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23(1), 22–54.

  • Tsou, K.-W., Hung, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United-Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision (ST/ESA/SER. A/366). United Nations Population Division.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Bueren, E., Daamen, T., Chen, Y., Franzen, A., Heurkens, E., Hobma, F., & Verheul, W. J. (2016). Urban development management: past, present and future. In M. Arkesteijn, T. Van der Voordt, H. Remoy, & Y. Chen (Eds.), Dear is durable: Liber Amicorum for Hans de Jonge (pp. 281–289). TU Delft Open.

  • Van Pelt, M. (2008). Fuzzy logic applied to daily life. Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, G. (2001). Social justice, integrated development planning and post-apartheid urban reconstruction. Urban Studies, 38(10), 1673–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Lan, Z. (2019). Park green spaces, public health and social inequalities: Understanding the interrelationships for policy implications. Land Use Policy, 83, 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Yip, T.L., Xie, L., & Wang, Y. (2018). A fuzzy-MADM based approach for site selection of offshore wind farm in busy waterways in China. Ocean Engineering, 168 , 121–132.

  • Xie, Y., Gong, H., Lan, H., & Zeng, S. (2018). Examining shrinking city of Detroit in the context of socio-spatial inequalities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 350–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, C., He, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, W., & Gao, Y. (2018). Inequality of public health and its role in spatial accessibility to medical facilities in China. Applied Geography, 92, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, S., Ma, Z., Song, W., & Liu, C. (2019). Spatial justice of a Chinese Metropolis: A perspective on housing price-to-income ratios in Nanjing, China. Sustainability, 11(6), 1808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi, S., & Farahani, I. (2019). Spatial inequality in Tehran, a structural explanation. Urban Research & Practice, 1–22.

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1988). Fuzzy logic. Computer, 21(4), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, P., Li, S., & Liu, D. (2020). Unequable spatial accessibility to hospitals in developing megacities: New evidence from Beijing. Health & Place, 65, 102406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Kristin Anderson of the University of Oklahoma, the USA for the English language editing of the paper. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which have been very helpful in improving the paper. This work was supported by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Hosseini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, A., Farhadi , E., Hussaini, F. et al. Analysis of spatial (in)equality of urban facilities in Tehran: an integration of spatial accessibility. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 6527–6555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01715-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01715-3

Keywords

Navigation