Embrace it, accept it, or fight like hell: understanding diverse responses to extractive industrial development
- 16 Downloads
This article considers why some people welcome externally imposed resource extractive development projects while seemingly similar others vehemently reject them. Informed by an understanding of human cultural and political undertakings as components of complex and conjoined systems that are simultaneously social and ecological, I identify economic, political, environmental, and cultural experiences and values that guide individuals’ decisions to embrace, accept, or oppose extractive industry. Drawing on recent ethnographic research in northeastern British Columbia—where First Nations and Euro-Canadian citizens concurrently confront ongoing logging, extensive oil and gas extraction, construction of a third massive hydroelectric dam, and renewed metallurgical coal mining—I suggest that diverse responses are significantly influenced by whether or not individuals perceive extractive industry as having adverse economic effects, the level of trust they place in governmental decision making, and whether or not they connect extractive industry to injustice and violations of citizens’ rights. In an era of unprecedented human impact, I ultimately argue, local outcomes of global resource extraction debates have an important role to play in shaping the future of our societies and our world.
KeywordsBritish Columbia Environmental sustainability Extractive industry Reflexivity Socioecological systems
I am grateful to Treaty 8 Tribal Association, the British Columbia residents who took time out of busy schedules to contribute to my research, and the Ohio State University’s Human-Environment Learning Lab (https://anthropology.osu.edu/research/laboratories/human-environment-learning-lab). Transcription assistance was provided by Lisa Beiswenger and Jude Snowden.
This study was funded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research (Grant No. 9177: “Contested Developments and Cumulative Effects: Understanding Diverse Responses to Energy Resource Development in British Columbia’s Peace River Region”).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Alaska Highway News. (2018). B.C. Supreme Court dismisses Site C injunction. Alaska highway news, 24 October 2018. https://www.alaskahighwaynews.ca/site-c/b-c-supreme-court-dismisses-site-c-injunction-1.23475176. Accessed 13 August 2019.
- Amnesty International. (2016). The point of no return: The human rights of indigenous peoples in Canada threatened by the Site C dam. London: Amnesty International Ltd.Google Scholar
- Anderies, J., Janssen, M., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social–ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9(1). https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/inline.html. Accessed 2 March 2018.
- Biersack, A., & Greenberg, J. B. (Eds.). (2006). Reimagining political ecology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Brody, H. (1981). Maps and dreams: Indians and the British Columbia frontier. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Carlowicz, M. (2017). Global temperatures. NASA Earth Observatory. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WorldOfChange/decadaltemp.php. Accessed 17 October 2017.
- Cox, S. (2018). Breaching the peace: The site C dam and a valley’s stand against big hydro. Vancouver, BC: On Point Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, I., & Lawson, N. (2002). Material flows due to mining and urbanization. In R. U. Ayres & L. Ayres (Eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology (pp. 351–364). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. Navigating Social–Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change,9(1), 352–387.Google Scholar
- Harkin, M. E., & Lewis, D. R. (Eds.). (2007). Native Americans and the environment: Perspectives on the ecological Indian. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Jensen, D., & Draffan, G. (2003). Strangely like war: The global assault on forests. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L., & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why we don’t “walk the talk”: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review,16(2), 151–160.Google Scholar
- Lee, P. G., & Hanneman, M. (2012). Altas of land cover, industrial land uses and industrial-caused land change in the Peace River Region of British Columbia. Edmonton, AB: Global Forest Watch Canada.Google Scholar
- Matheson, S. S., & Pollon, E. K. (1989). This was our valley. Calgary, AB: Detselig Enterprises.Google Scholar
- Nadasdy, P. (2003). Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge, and aboriginal-state relations in the southwest Yukon. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
- Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2018). World, n. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/view/Entry/230262?redirectedFrom=worldview. Accessed 4 May 2018.
- Philander, S. G. (2012). Encyclopedia of global warming and climate change (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Price, R. T. (1991). Legacy: Indian treaty relationships. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
- Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ridington, R., & Ridington, J. (2013). Where happiness dwells: A history of the Dane-zaa First Nations. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
- Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/. Accessed 1 April 2018.