Advertisement

Developing a coupled environmental impact assessment (C-EIA) method with sustainable development approach for environmental analysis in coal industries

  • Sajjad Mohebali
  • Soroush Maghsoudy
  • Faramarz Doulati ArdejaniEmail author
  • Foojan Shafaei
Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Mining and the mineral industry have always been one of the main environmental challenges of human societies. In the current research, a coupled method for environmental assessment of coal industries was presented. At first, an inventory of the plant activities and the environmental impacts were prepared. Then, four EIA methods, including Leopold matrix, modified Folchi, AHP method, and RIAM matrix, were used to assess the environmental impacts of the plant. After that, the coupled environmental impact assessment (C-EIA) method was used to integrate the outcomes of different EIA techniques. The result of different methods compared with each other, and then, they are combined using both the Borda and Copland methods and a novel method called direct ranking strategy. Finally, the obtained results from these three methods are integrated as well, to provide a unique address for the environmental impact assessment of the plant. Developed C-EIA method was used for assessing the Alborz Sharghi coal washing plant of northeastern Iran and its impacts on the surrounding environment. The most effective impacting factor of the plant on the critical components was evaluated as the “material existed in the tailings” that should be considered in any factory development plans. By using the Phillips method and the sustainable development index (SDI), the quantitative dependence value of the plant to the sustainable development components was estimated, and the plant sustainability number (S) was obtained (− 0.0395). This SD number means that some modifications should be taken on the project. C-EIA method and SDI are the powerful methods for quantitative environmental analysis of the industrial factories especially in coal mining sector with high-risk potential.

Keywords

Coupled EIA Alborz Sharghi coal washing plant Sustainable development index (SDI) Philips method Direct Ranking Strategy (SDR) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the experts who provided their knowledge on weighting the criteria by completing the questionnaires. Professor Mohammad Ataei and Dr. Behshad Jodeiri Shokri are appreciated for their invaluable comments. The Alborz Sharghi Coal Washing Plant is thanked for financial and technical support.

Supplementary material

10668_2019_513_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 39 kb)

References

  1. Aliyu, A. S., Ramli, A. T., & Saleh, M. A. (2014). Environmental impact assessment of a new nuclear power plant (NPP) based on atmospheric dispersion modeling. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,28, 1897–1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aryafar, A., Yousefi, S., & Ardejani, F. D. (2013). The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Environmental Earth Sciences,68, 2313–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashofteh, P.-S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2017). Multi-criteria environmental impact assessment of alternative irrigation networks with an adopted matrix-based method. Water Resource Management,31, 903–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borda, J. C., (1784). Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin, Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences pour 1781. Paris (English Transl by Grazia, A 1953 Isis 44).Google Scholar
  5. Copeland, A. H. (1951). A reasonable social welfare function. Applications of Mathematics to Social Sciences Seminar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. Da Silva Dias, A. M., Fonseca, A., & Paglia, A. P. (2019). Technical quality of fauna monitoring programs in the environmental impact assessments of large mining projects in southeastern Brazil. Science of the Total Environment,650, 216–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications,41, 635–643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ettler, V. (2016). Soil contamination near non-ferrous metal smelters: a review. Appl Geochemistry,64, 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fattahi Mejlej, A., Jodeiri Shokri, B., & Zare Naghadehi, M. (2015). The flotation system optimization in Alborz-Sharghi coal washing plant; A laboratory study. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering,49, 19–32.Google Scholar
  10. Folchi R (2003) Environmental impact statement for mining with explosives: a quantitative method. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. ISEE; 1999 (pp 285–296).Google Scholar
  11. Ghaedrahmati, R., & Doulati Ardejani, F. (2012). Environmental impact assessment of coal washing plant (Alborz-Sharghi–Iran). Journal of Mining and Environment,3, 69–77.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbuena, R., Jr., Kawamura, A., Medina, R., et al. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of structural flood mitigation measures by a rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) technique: A case study in Metro Manila, Philippines. Science of the Total Environment,456, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jodeiri Shokri, B., Doulati Ardejani, F., & Moradzadeh, A. (2016a). Mapping the flow pathways and contaminants transportation around a coal washing plant using the VLF-EM, Geo-electrical and IP techniques—A case study, NE Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences,75, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jodeiri Shokri, B., Doulati Ardejani, F., & Ramazi, H. (2016b). Environmental geochemistry and acid mine drainage evaluation of an abandoned coal waste pile at the Alborz-Sharghi coal washing plant, NE Iran. Natural Resources Research,25, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., et al. (2014). Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Journal of Cleaner Production,73, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klamler, C. (2005). On the closeness aspect of three voting rules: Borda–Copeland–Maximin. Group Decision and Negotiation,14, 233–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-0958-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamboray, C. (2007). A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda’s, Copeland’s, Slater’s and Kemeny’s rules. Mathematical Social Sciences,54, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lele, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development,19, 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leopold, L. B., Clarke, F. E., Hanshaw, B. B. (1971). A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. US Dept. of the Interior.Google Scholar
  20. Manfredi, M., & Vignali, G. (2014). Life cycle assessment of a packaged tomato puree: a comparison of environmental impacts produced by different life cycle phases. Journal of Cleaner Production,73, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirmohammadi, M., Gholamnejad, J., Fattahpour, V., et al. (2009). Designing of an environmental assessment algorithm for surface mining projects. Journal of Environmental Management,90, 2422–2435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monjezi, M., Shahriar, K., Dehghani, H., & Namin, F. S. (2009). Environmental impact assessment of open pit mining in Iran. Environmental Geology,58, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muir, B. R., & Booth, A. L. (2012). An environmental justice analysis of caribou recovery planning, protection of an Indigenous culture, and coal mining development in northeast British Columbia, Canada. Environment, Development and Sustainability,14, 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Namin, F. S., Ghafari, H., & Dianati, A. (2014). New model for environmental impact assessment of tunneling projects. Journal of Environmental Protection (Irvine, California),05, 530–550.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.56056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pastakia, C. M. R. (1998). The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM)—a new tool for environmental impact assessment. In K. Jensen (Ed.), Environmental impact assessment using the rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM). Fredensborg: Olsen & Olsen.Google Scholar
  26. Pastakia, C. M. R., & Jensen, A. (1998). The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,18, 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Phillips, J. (2010a). The advancement of a mathematical model of sustainable development. Sustainability Science,5, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips, J. (2010b). Evaluating the level and nature of sustainable development for a geothermal power plant. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,14, 2414–2425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips, J. (2016). The geocybernetic assessment matrix (GAM)—a new assessment tool for evaluating the level and nature of sustainability or unsustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,56, 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robu, B., Jitar, O., Teodosiu, C., et al. (2015). Environmental impact and risk assessment of the main pollution sources from the Romanian Black sea coast. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14(2), 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resour Alloc RWS Publ USA.Google Scholar
  32. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research,48, 9–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saffari, A., Ataei, M., Sereshki, F., & Naderi, M. (2017). Environmental impact assessment (EIA) by using the Fuzzy Delphi Folchi (FDF) method (case study: Shahrood cement plant, Iran). Environment, Development and Sustainability,21, 817–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0063-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shahhosseini, M., Ardejani, F. D., & Baafi, E. (2017). Geochemistry of rare earth elements in a neutral mine drainage environment, Anjir Tangeh, northern Iran. International Journal of Coal Geology,183, 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharma, Y. C., Aggarwal, P., & Singh, T. N. (2009). Economic liabilities of environmental pollution by coal mining: Indian scenario. Environment, Development and Sustainability,11, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shen, L., Muduli, K., & Barve, A. (2015). Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach. Resources Policy,46, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suthar, S., & Sajwan, A. (2014). Rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) analysis as decision tool to select new site for municipal solid waste disposal: A case study of Dehradun city, India. Sustainable Cities and Society,13, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas, T. T., Sony, C. D., & Kuruvila, E. C. (2017). Rapid environmental impact assessment of eco-tourism in Pookote Lake, Wayanad. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 3149–3154.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, J., Wang, R., Zhu, Y., & Li, J. (2018). Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China. Energy Policy,115, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, N., & Wei, D. (2018). A modified D numbers methodology for environmental impact assessment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,24, 653–669.  https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1216018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2006). Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research,174, 1885–1913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu, W. W. (2011). Beyond travel & tourism competitiveness ranking using DEA, GST, ANN and Borda count. Expert Systems with Applications,38, 12974–12982.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xue, Y., & Huang, L. (2018). Factors influencing the livelihoods of ecological migrants in coal mined-out areas in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability,21, 1–15.Google Scholar
  44. Yu, Y., Chen, S.-E., Deng, K.-Z., et al. (2018). Subsidence mechanism and stability assessment methods for partial extraction mines for sustainable development of mining cities—A review. Sustainability,10, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang, L., Wang, J., & Feng, Y. (2018). Life cycle assessment of opencast coal mine production: A case study in Yimin mining area in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,25, 8475–8486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajjad Mohebali
    • 1
    • 3
  • Soroush Maghsoudy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Faramarz Doulati Ardejani
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Foojan Shafaei
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mining, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Mine Environment and Hydrogeology Research Laboratory (MEHR Lab)University of TehranTehranIran
  3. 3.School of Progress EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations