Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 469–500 | Cite as

A panel data analysis of a spatial measurement of green infrastructure and its potential effectiveness on peak streamflow

  • Hye Kyung LeeEmail author
Article
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

Research on the possible benefits of green infrastructure as a hazard mitigation strategy has been limited by the lack of effective tools for the identification and measurement of the specific dimensions of green infrastructure particularly within highly developed urban environments. Consequently, there has been little empirical research conducted on the potential benefits of green infrastructure for reducing streamflow, an indicator of runoff and potential flooding mitigation. This study seeks to further research green infrastructure as a potential tool for hazard mitigation by examining its consequences for streamflow over a 2-year period in 2004 and 2010 for two key urban areas subject to flooding in Texas, USA (Austin and Houston Metropolitan areas) in panel models to assess the effectiveness of green infrastructure for reducing runoff as assessed by using streamflow gage data predicting annual peak flow. The statistical models suggested that green infrastructure contributes to reduce annual peak flow in urbanized watersheds. The effect in the fixed effects model suggests that with every percent increase in green infrastructure within the 100-year floodplain, peak annual flow decreased by 7.7% (R2 = 0.6985). The effects of green infrastructure outside the floodplain appeared to be significant, and its magnitude in the fixed effects model was − 7.1% (R2 = 0.6447). These differences suggest slightly greater consequences for preserving green infrastructure within floodplains when it comes to peak annual flows. Moreover, the analyses explained that green infrastructure in Austin appears to be more effective on peak annual flow when, compared to Houston, suggesting that green infrastructure has elevated consequences in areas with greater topographical diversity. The effectiveness of green infrastructure in critical places will help make a guideline for the balanced urban development with implementation of green infrastructure.

Keywords

Green infrastructure Streamflow Hazard mitigation Runoff 

References

  1. Ahern, J. (2007). Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. In V. Novotny & P. Brown (Eds.), Cities of the future: Towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management (pp. 267–283). London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, W. (2012). Environmental reviews and case studies: Advancing green infrastructure at all scales: From landscape to site. Environmental Practice,14(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
  3. Armson, D., Stringer, P., & Ennons, A. (2012). The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,11(3), 245–255.Google Scholar
  4. Armson, D., Stringer, P., & Ennos, A. (2013). The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,12(3), 282–286.Google Scholar
  5. Babbie, E. (2011). The basics of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  6. Baloch, M. A., Ames, D. P., & Tanik, A. (2015). Hydrologic impacts of climate and land-use change on Namnam Stream in Koycegiz Watershed, Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,12, 1481–1494.Google Scholar
  7. Baptiste, A. K., Foley, C., & Smardon, R. (2015). Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: A case study of Syracuse, NY. Landscape and Urban Planning,136, 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. Beatley, T. (2009). Planning for coastal resilience: Best practices for calamitous times. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bedient, P., Holder, A., & Vieux, B. (2002). A radar-based flood alert system (FAS) designed for Houston, Texas. In Proceedings from the ninth international conference on urban drainage, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  10. Benedict, M. A., & McMahon, E. T. (2002). Green infrastructure: Smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable Resources Journal,20(3), 12.Google Scholar
  11. Bengston, D., Fletcher, J., & Nelson, K. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning,69(2–3), 271–286.Google Scholar
  12. Brody, S., Blessing, R., Sebastian, A., & Bedient, P. (2014). Examining the impact of land use/land cover characteristics on flood losses. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,57(8), 1252–1265.Google Scholar
  13. Brody, S., Gunn, J., Peacock, W., & Highfield, W. (2011a). Examining the influence of development patterns on flood damages along the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Plannin Educaiton and Research,31(4), 438–448.Google Scholar
  14. Brody, S., & Highfield, W. (2013). Open space protection and flood mitigation: A national study. Land Use Policy,32, 89–95.Google Scholar
  15. Brody, S., Highfield, W., Blessing, R., Makino, T., & Shepard, C. (2017). Evaluating the effects of open space configurations in reducing flood damage along the Gulf of Mexico coast. Landscape and Urban Planning,167, 225–231.Google Scholar
  16. Brody, S., Highfield, W., & Kang, J. (2011b). Rising waters: The causes and consequences of flooding in the United States. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brody, S., Kim, H., & Gunn, J. (2013). Examining the impacts of development patterns on flooding on the Gulf of Mexico Coast. Urban Studies,50(4), 789–806.Google Scholar
  18. Brody, S. D., Peacock, W. G., & Gunn, J. (2012). Ecological indicators of flood risk along the Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Indicators,18, 493–500.Google Scholar
  19. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Highfield, W. E., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Identifying the impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas. Disasters,32(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, J., Theller, L., Gitau, M., Engel, B., & Harbor, J. (2017). Urbanization impact on surface runoff of the contiguous United States. Journal of Environmental Management,187, 470–481.Google Scholar
  21. Cheng, C. (2016). Spatial climate justice and green infrastructure assessment: A case for the Huron River watershed, Michigan, USA. GI Forum,1, 179–190.Google Scholar
  22. Cheng, C., Yang, Y. C., Ryan, R., Yu, Q., & Brabec, E. (2017). Assessing climate change-induced flooding mitigation for adaptation in Boston’s Charles River watershed, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning,167, 25–36.Google Scholar
  23. Connors, J. P., Galletti, C. S., & Chow, W. T. L. (2013). Landscape configuration and urban heat island effects: Assessing the relationship between landscape characteristics and land surface temperature in Phoenix, Arizona. Landscape Ecology,28(2), 271–283.Google Scholar
  24. Dietz, M. (2007). Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommentations for future directions. Water, Air, and Soil pollution,186, 351–363.Google Scholar
  25. Dietz, M., & Cluasen, J. (2008). Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. Journal of Environmental Management,87(4), 560–566.Google Scholar
  26. Gill, S., Handley, J., Ennos, A., & Pauleit, S. (2007). Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment,33(1), 115–133.Google Scholar
  27. Hartel, D. (2003). Tree canopy ordinances. Retrieved from http://www.urbanforestrysouth.org/resources/library/ttresources/tree-canopyordinances/fss_get/file. Accessed 11 March 2018.
  28. Hepcan, C. C. (2013). Quantifying landscape pattern and connectivity in a Mediterranean coastal settlement: The case of the Urla district, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,185(1), 143–155.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, E., Dorfman, J., & Gramer, E. (2010). Evaluating the impact of government land use policies on tree canopy coverage. Land Use Policy,27(2), 407–414.Google Scholar
  30. Jayasooriya, V., Ng, A., Muthukumaran, S., & Perera, B. (2017). Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,21, 34–47.Google Scholar
  31. Jennings, D. B., & Jarnagin, S. T. (2002). Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: A historical perspective in a mid-atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecology,17(5), 471–489.Google Scholar
  32. Kim, H. W., Kim, J., Li, W., Yang, P., & Cao, Y. (2017). Exploring the impact of green space health on runoff reduction using NDVI. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,28, 81–87.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, H. K. (2018). The potential implementation of green infrastructure assessment using high-resolution National Agriculture Imagery Program data for sustainable hazard mitigation. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,25(4), 371–381.Google Scholar
  34. Leitão, A. B., Miller, J., Ahern, J., & McGarigal, K. (2006). Measuring landscapes: A planner’s handbook. Washington: Island press.Google Scholar
  35. Leopold, L. B. (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning: A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 554. Retrieved from https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1968/0554/report.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2017.
  36. Looper, J., & Vieus, B. (2012). An assessment of distributed flash flood forecasting accuracy using radar and rain gauge input for a physics, based distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology,412, 114–132.Google Scholar
  37. McGarigal, K. & Marks, B. (1994). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Retrieved from https://www.umass.edu/landeco/pubs/mcgarigal.marks.1995.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2018.
  38. Meerow, S., & Newell, J. (2017). Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning,159, 62–75.Google Scholar
  39. Muñoz, L., Olivera, F., Giglio, M., & Berke, P. (2018). The impact of urbanization on the streamflows and the 100-year floodplain extent of the Sims Bayou in Houston, Texas. International Journal of River Basin Management,16(1), 61–69.Google Scholar
  40. Olivera, F., & DeFee, B. B. (2007). Urbanization and its effect on runoff in the Whiteoak Bayou Watershed, Texas. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association,43(1), 170–182.Google Scholar
  41. Park, S., Hepcan, C., Hepcan, S., & Cook, E. (2014). Influence of urban form on landscape pattern and connectivity in metropolitan regions: A comparative case study of Phoenix, AZ, USA, and Izmir, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Aseessment,186(10), 6301–6318.Google Scholar
  42. Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gailard, J., Tucker, C., & Stenseth, N. (2005). Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,20(9), 503–510.Google Scholar
  43. Prasad, S. (2016). Assessing the need for evacuation assistance in the 100 year floodplain of South Florida. Applied Geography,67, 67–76.Google Scholar
  44. Ritters, K., Wickham, J., & Wade, T. (2009). An indicator of forest dynamics using a shifting landscape mosaic. Ecological Indicators,9(1), 107–117.Google Scholar
  45. Saleh, I., Kavian, A., Habibnezhad Roushan, M., & Jafarian, Z. (2017). The efficiency of vegetative buffer strips in runoff quality and quantity control. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1411-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Veenhuis, J., & Gannett, D. (1986). The effects of urbanization on floods in the Austin metropolitan area. Texas: US Department of the Interior, Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  47. Yang, B., & Li, S. (2013). Green infrastructure design for stormwater runoff and water quality: Empirical evidence from large watershed-scale community developments. Water,5, 2038–2057.Google Scholar
  48. Young, R. F. (2011). Planting the living city: Best practices in planning green infrastructure—Results from major US cities. Journal of the American Planning Association,77(4), 368–381.Google Scholar
  49. Zahran, S., Brody, S., Peacock, W., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: A model of flood casualities in Texas. Disaster,32(4), 537–560.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringDankook UniversityJukjeon-dong, Suji-gu, Yongin-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations