Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 33–46 | Cite as

HPI appraisal of concentrations of heavy metals in dynamic and static flow of Ganga River System

  • Gagan MattaEmail author
  • Avinash Kumar
  • A. K. Tiwari
  • Pradeep K. Naik
  • R. Berndtsson
Article

Abstract

Ganga River system is a life support system to sustain the people of northeast region, India, by providing freshwater resource. In this study, the seasonal heavy metal concentrations of Ganga River system at Haridwar region (India) have been characterised for metal pollution. The collection of water samples was done from 10 different locations and analysed for various metal parameters (Zn, Pb, Mn, Fe, Cu, Si, Al, Ni, Cd, Mg and Co) using a standard laboratory procedures. The pollution level was assessed from the observed concentrations by using Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) for nine heavy metals. The observed values of HPI were found lower than the Critical Pollution Index value of 100 (average value 78.62 and 81.18) during the study period. The concentration of Fe and Mg is exceeding the desirable limits of the World Health Organization, Bureau of Indian Standards and US Environmental Protection Agency in all water samples throughout the study period. The levels of all the metals were higher in the monsoon season and lower in the winter season. The Karl Pearson’s correlation matrix was developed by using the mean values of all parameters and showed the light intensity positively correlated with biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and sulphate which indicate good microbial activity. Dissolved oxygen and BOD is found negatively correlated. From this study, it is easy to understand the various harmful effects of metal pollution to irrigation water and health of local people.

Keywords

Water quality Heavy Metal Pollution Index River Ganga System Dynamic and static flow 

References

  1. APHA. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  2. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (2012). Specification for drinking water IS 10500: 2012, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  3. Edet, A. E., & Offiong, O. E. (2002). Evaluation of water quality pollution indices for heavy metal contamination monitoring. A study case from Akpabuyo-Odukpani area, Lower Cross River Basin (southeastern Nigeria). GeoJournal,57, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). A report on water: Monitoring and assessment. https://archive.epa.gov/water/archive/web/html/index-19.html.
  5. Gupta, N., Yadav, K. K., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. (2013). Assessment of physico-chemical properties of Yamuna river in Agra city. International Journal of ChemTech Research,5, 528–531.Google Scholar
  6. Joshi, D. M., Bhandari, N. S., Kumar, A., & Agarwal, N. (2009). Statistical analysis of physico-chemical parameters of water of River Ganga in Haridwar district. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry,2(3), 579–587.Google Scholar
  7. Kashyap, R., Verma, K. S., Bhardwaj, S. K., Mahajan, P. K., Sharma, J. K., & Sharma, R. (2016). Water chemistry of Yamuna river along Ponta Sahib industrial hub of Himachal Pradesh, India. Research in Environment and Life Sciences,9, 277–281.Google Scholar
  8. Khanna, D. R., Bhutiani, R., & Matta, G. (2011). Water analysis at a glance. Published by action for sustainable, efficacious development and awareness.Google Scholar
  9. Mahato, M. K., Singh, P. K., & Tiwari, A. K. (2014). Evaluation of metals in mine water and assessment of heavy metal pollution index of East Bokaro Coalfield area, Jharkhand, India. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering,7(04), 1611–1618.Google Scholar
  10. Matta, G. (2010). Freshwater: Resources and pollution. Environment Conservation Journal,11(3), 161–169.Google Scholar
  11. Matta, G., & Gjyli, L. (2016). Mercury, lead and arsenic: Impact on the environment and human health India. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences,9(2), 718–725.Google Scholar
  12. Matta, G., Gjyli, L., Kumar, A., & Machel, J. (2018a). Hydrochemical characteristics and planktonic composition assessment of River Henwal in Himalayan Region of Uttarakhand using CPI, Simpson’s and Shannon-Weaver Index. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences,11(1), 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matta, G., & Kumar, A. (2015). Monitoring and evaluation of River Ganga System in Himalayan Region with reference to limnological aspects. World Applied Sciences Journal,33(2), 203–212.Google Scholar
  14. Matta, G., Kumar, A., Dhingra, G. K., Singh, P., Gjyli, L., & Kumar, A. (2018b). Limnological assessment of anthropogenic activities of River Henwal. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences,11(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matta, G., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., & Gjyli, L. (2015a). Heavy metal analysis of industrial effluent allied with groundwater. ESSENCE—International Journal of Environmental Rehabilitation and Conservation,4(1), 33–40.Google Scholar
  16. Matta, G., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., & Kumar, A. (2014). Effect of industrial effluent on groundwater quality with special reference to DO, BOD and COD. Journal of Sustainable Environmental Research,3(2), 183–186.Google Scholar
  17. Matta, G., Kumar, A., Srivastava, S., Singh, V., & Dhingra, G. K. (2015b). Impact assessment of water quality of Ganga Canal System in Himalayan Region. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research,6(5), 1524–1531.Google Scholar
  18. Matta, G., Pandey, R. R., & Saini, K. K. (2015c). Assessment of pollution on water quality and phytoplankton diversity in canal system of River Ganga. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research,4(11), 889–908.Google Scholar
  19. Matta, G., & Uniyal, D. P. (2017). Assessment of species diversity and impact of pollution on limnological conditions of River Ganga. International Journal of Water,11(2), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohan, S. V., Nithila, P., & Reddy, S. J. (1996). Estimation of heavy metal in drinking water and development of heavy metal pollution index. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A,31(2), 283–289.Google Scholar
  21. Mudgal, K. D., Kumari, M., & Sharma, D. K. (2009). Hydrochemical analysis of drinking water quality of Alwar district, Rajasthan. Nature Science,7(2), 30–39.Google Scholar
  22. Parsad, B., & Bose, J. M. (2001). Evaluation of heavy metal pollution index for surface and spring water near a limestone mining area of the lower Himalyas. Environmental Geology,41, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pulforda, D., & Riddell-Blackb, C. (2002). Stewarta. International Journal of Phytoremediation,4(1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pushpa, R., Tiwari, A., Navin, R., & Sood, S. (2014). Studies in determination of some parameters of ‘Ganga river water, Kanwar Mela 2013, Haridwar. Journal of Innovative Biology,1(2), 122–125.Google Scholar
  25. Ravindra, K., Ameena, M., Monika, R., & Kaushik, A. (2003). Seasonal variations in physicochemical characteristics of river Yamuna in Haryana and its ecological best designated use. Journal of Environmental Monitoring,5, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Renberg, I., Persson, M. W., & Emteryd, O. (1994). Pre-industrial atmospheric lead contamination detected in Swedish lake sediments. Nature,368, 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seth, R., Mohan, M., Singh, P., Rakesh, S., Dobhal, R., Singh, K. P., et al. (2016). Water quality evaluation of Himalayan Rivers of Kumaun region, Uttarakhand, India. Applied Water Science,6, 137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0213-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma, R. K., Agrawal, M., & Marshall, F. (2007). Heavy metal contamination of soil and vegetables in suburban areas of Varanasi, India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,66(2), 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharma, R. C., Singh, N., & Chauhan, A. (2015). The influence of physico-chemical parameters on phytoplankton distribution in a head water stream of Garhwal Himalayas: A case study. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research,42, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharma, M., Tobschall, H., & Singh, I. (2003). Environmental impact assessment in the Moradabad industrial area (rivers Ramganga-Ganga interfluve), Ganga Plain, India. Environmental Geology,43, 957–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheykhi, V., & Moore, F. (2016). Environmental risk assessment of heavy metals pollution in the aquatic ecosystem-a case study: Sediment of Kor river, Iran. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,22, 899–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh, P. K., Tiwari, A. K., & Mahato, M. K. (2013). Qualitative assessment of surface water of West Bokaro Coalfield, Jharkhand by using water quality index method. International Journal of ChemTech Research,5(5), 2351–2356.Google Scholar
  33. Sirajudeen, J., & Arul Manikandan, S. (2012). Seasonal variation of heavy metal contamination of ground water in and around Uyyakondan channel Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu. Pelagia Research Library,3(5), 1113–1119.Google Scholar
  34. Tare, V., Yadav, A. V., Singh, A. V., & Bose, P. (2003). Analysis of photosynthetic activity in the most polluted stretch of river Ganga. Water Research,37(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiwari, A. K., De Maio, M., Singh, P. K., & Mahato, M. K. (2015). Evaluation of surface water quality by using GIS and a Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) model in a coal mining area, India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,95, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiwari, A. K., & Singh, A. K. (2014). Hydrogeochemical investigation and groundwater quality assessment of Pratapgarh district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Geological Society of India,83(3), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tiwari, A. K., Singh, P. K., Singh, A. K., & De Maio, M. (2016). Estimation of heavy metal contamination in groundwater and development of a Heavy Metal Pollution Index by using GIS technique. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1750-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tyagi, S., Sharma, B., Singh, P., & Dobhal, R. (2013). Water quality assessment regarding water quality index. American Journal of Water Resources,1(3), 34–38.  https://doi.org/10.12691/ajwr-1-3-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. USEPA. (2009). National primary drinking water regulations. Federal register, EPA816-F-09-004. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, G., & Fowler, B. A. (2008). Roles of biomarkers in evaluating interactions among mixtures of lead, cadmium and arsenic. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology,233(1), 92–99. (PubMed: 18325558).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. WHO. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, L. P., Ye, X., & Feng, H. (2007). Heavy metal contamination in western xiamen bay sediments and its vicinity, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin,54, 974–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou, F., Liu, Y., & Guo, H. (2007). Application of multivariate statistical methods to water quality assessment of the watercourses in Northwestern New Territories, Hong Kong. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,132(1–3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Environmental ScienceGurukula Kangri UniversityHaridwarIndia
  2. 2.DIATI-Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  3. 3.Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt. of IndiaCentral Ground Water BoardChandigarhIndia
  4. 4.Centre for Middle Eastern StudiesLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations