Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 2857–2889 | Cite as

Evaluating waste collection management: the case of macro-areas and municipalities in Italy

  • Gaetano MusellaEmail author
  • Massimiliano Agovino
  • Mariaconcetta Casaccia
  • Alessandro Crociata
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to analyse the gap among Italian macro-areas performances in terms of separate waste collection rate and density of separate waste collection. The aim is twofold: (1) to investigate if clear and effective infrastructure policies, in Southern Italy, have been realized that are able to reduce the gap in the separate waste collection process with the rest of Italy and (2) to evaluate if Southern Italian municipalities have improved their operational capacity in the separate waste collection process. In particular, we exploit data collected in 2012 by several Italian sources (ISPRA and ISTAT). We implement a recentered influence function regression technique that allows us to put two macro-areas in comparison (North vs. South and Centre vs. South). This technique, once measured the territorial gaps, allows to disentangle the gap in the two spatial units of analysis (at municipalities level and at macro-areas level). The estimates suggest that while in the North the issue of waste is managed effectively and responsibly with respect to the Southern area, the latter has exhibited an advantage with respect to the Central Italy; furthermore, Southern municipalities appear to be unable to pursue a virtuous waste management system generating the persistence of a marked territorial gap in terms of both SCR and DSC. The main policy implications are discussed.

Keywords

Waste management Government policy Recycling Selective collection rate RIF regression 

JEL Classification

C21 Q5 Q53 R11 R5 R52 

References

  1. Agovino, M., Casaccia, M., & Crociata, A. (2016a). The impact of European Regional Development Fund on separate waste collection: evidence from Italian regions. Environmental Science & Policy,61, 97–107.Google Scholar
  2. Agovino, M., Casaccia, M., & Crociata, A. (2017a). Effectiveness and efficiency of European Regional Development Fund on separate waste collection: evidence from Italian regions by a stochastic frontier approach. Economia Politica (Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics),34(1), 105–137.Google Scholar
  3. Agovino, M., Ferrara, M., & Garofalo, A. (2016b). An exploratory analysis on waste management in Italy: A Focus on waste disposal in landfill. Land Use Policy,57, 669–681.Google Scholar
  4. Agovino, M., Garofalo, A., & Mariani, A. (2016c). Effects of environmental regulation on separate waste collection dynamics: Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production,124(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
  5. Agovino, M., Garofalo, A., & Mariani, A. (2017b). Separate waste collection in Italy: The role of socio-cultural factors and targets set by law. Environment, Development and Sustainability,19(2), 589–605.Google Scholar
  6. APAT, Agenzia per la protezione dell’ambiente e per i servizi tecnici. (2007). IV Rapporto APAT Qualità dell’ambiente urbano. http://www.reteambiente.it/repository/normativa/4706_apat_urb.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.
  7. Armiero, M., & D’Alisa, G. (2012). Rights of resistance: The garbage struggles for environmental justice in Campania, Italy. Capitalism Nature Socialism,23(4), 52–68.Google Scholar
  8. Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. J. (2001). A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household-waste management. Environment and Planning A,33(11), 2025–2048.Google Scholar
  9. Bello, H., & Szymanski, S. (1996). Compulsory competitive tendering for public services in the UK: The case of refuse collection. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,23(5–6), 881–903.Google Scholar
  10. Berglund, C., & Söderholm, P. (2003). An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Environmental & Resource Economics,26, 429.Google Scholar
  11. BiPRO. (2012). Screening of waste management performance of EU Member States. Report submitted under the EC project “Support to Member States in improving waste management based on assessment of Member States’ performance”. Report prepared for the European Commission, DG ENV. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/Screening_report.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.
  12. Bruvoll, A., & Nyborg, K. (2004). The cold shiver of not giving enough: On the social cost of recycling campaigns. Land Economics,80(4), 539–549.Google Scholar
  13. Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (1997). The impact of state and local policies on the recycling effort. Eastern Economic Journal,23(4), 411–423.Google Scholar
  14. Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2006). Analyzing demand for disposal and recycling services: A systems approach. Eastern Economic Journal,32(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
  15. Castellano, R., Musella, G., & Punzo, G. (2017). Structure of the labour market and wage inequality: Evidence from European countries. Quality & Quantity,51(5), 2191–2218.Google Scholar
  16. Castellano, R., Musella, G., & Punzo, G. (2018). Exploring changes in the employment structure and wage inequality in Western Europe using the unconditional quantile regression. Empirica, 1–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-017-9397-z.Google Scholar
  17. Cecere, G., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2014). Waste prevention and social preferences: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Ecological Economics,107, 163–176.Google Scholar
  18. Coggins, P. C. (1994). Who is the recycler? Journal of Waste Management and Resource Recovery,1(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
  19. Corraliza, J. A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach. Environment and behavior,32(6), 832–848.Google Scholar
  20. Crociata, A., Agovino, M., & Sacco, P. L. (2015). Recycling waste: Does culture matter? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics,55, 40–47.Google Scholar
  21. Crociata, A., Agovino, M., & Sacco, P. L. (2016). Neighborhood effects and pro-environmental behavior: The case of Italian separate waste collection. Journal of Cleaner Production,135, 80–89.Google Scholar
  22. Cruz, N. F., Ferreira, S., Cabral, M., Simões, P., & Marques, R. C. (2014). Packaging waste recycling in Europe: Is the industry paying for it? Waste Management,34(2), 298–308.Google Scholar
  23. D’Alisa, G., Burgalassi, D., Healy, H., & Walter, M. (2010). Conflict in Campania: Waste emergency on crisis of democracy. Ecological Economics,70, 239–249.Google Scholar
  24. D’Alisa, G., Di Nola, M. F., & Giampietro, M. (2012). A multi-scale analysis of urban waste metabolism: Density of waste disposed in Campania. Journal of Cleaner Production,35, 59–70.Google Scholar
  25. D’Alisa, G., & Kallis, G. (2016). A political ecology of maladaptation: Insights from a Gramscian theory of the State. Global Environmental Change,38, 230–242.Google Scholar
  26. D’Amato, A., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2015). Waste and organized crime in regional enviroments. How waste tariffs and mafia affect waste management and disposal. Resource and Energy Economics,41, 185–201.Google Scholar
  27. Di Vita, G. (1997). Macroeconomic effects of the recycling of waste derived from imported nonrenewable raw materials. Resources Policy,23(4), 179–186.Google Scholar
  28. Distaso, A. (2012). For an integrated and sustainable management of solid urban waste: An approach based on theory of social costs. International Journal of Sustainable Development,15(3), 220–248.Google Scholar
  29. Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S. A., & Thompson, D. J. (1986). Competitive tendering and efficiency: The case of refuse collection. Fiscal studies,7(4), 69–87.Google Scholar
  30. EC, European Commission. (2010). Ex Post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes 20002006 financed by the ERDF in Objective 1 and 2 Regions—Synthesis report, European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/synthesis_eval2000_2006.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.
  31. ECA. (2012). Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives?. Special Report No 20/2012.  https://doi.org/10.2865/4077. ECA Publishing.
  32. EEA. (2013). Managing municipal solid wasteA review of achievements in 32 European Countries. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen (EEA Report No2/2013).Google Scholar
  33. Expósito, A., & Velasco, F. (2018). Municipal solid-waste recycling market and the European 2020 Horizon Strategy: A regional efficiency analysis in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production,172, 938–948.Google Scholar
  34. Fiorillo, D. (2013). Household waste recycling: National survey evidence from Italy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,56(8), 1125–1151.Google Scholar
  35. Firpo, S., Fortin, N., & Lemieux, T. (2007). Decomposing wage distributions using recentered influence function regressions. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (June).Google Scholar
  36. Firpo, S., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica,77(3), 953–973.Google Scholar
  37. Fortin, N., Lemieux, T., & Firpo, S. (2011). Decomposition methods in economics. Handbook of Labor Economics,4, 1–102.Google Scholar
  38. Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivational crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys,15, 589–611.Google Scholar
  39. Garofalo, A., Castellano, R., Punzo, G., & Musella, G. (2017). Skills and labour incomes: How unequal is Italy as part of the Southern European countries? Quality & Quantity, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0531-6.Google Scholar
  40. Greco, G., Allegrini, M., Del Lungo, C., Savellini, P. G., & Gabellini, L. (2015). Drivers of solid waste collection costs. Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production,106, 364–371.Google Scholar
  41. Guerrini, A., Carvalho, P., Romano, G., Marques, R. C., & Leardini, C. (2017). Assessing efficiency drivers in municipal solid waste collection services through a non-parametric method. Journal of Cleaner Production,147, 431–441.Google Scholar
  42. Guimarães, B., Simões, P., & Marques, R. C. (2010). Does performance evaluation help public managers? A balanced scorecard approach in urban waste services. Journal of Environmental Management,91(12), 2632–2638.Google Scholar
  43. Hage, O., & Söderholm, P. (2008). An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: The case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Management,28(10), 1720–1731.Google Scholar
  44. Hampel, F. R. (1974). The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association,69, 383–393.Google Scholar
  45. Heckley, G., Gerdtham, U. G., & Kjellsson, G. (2016). A general method for decomposing the causes of socioeconomic inequality in health. Journal of Health Economics,48, 89–106.Google Scholar
  46. Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., & Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results. The Journal of Socio-Economics,24(1), 105–127.Google Scholar
  47. Hung, S. Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H. M., & Lin, W. M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,69, 415–427.Google Scholar
  48. Infante, D., & Smirnova, J. (2009). Rent-seeking under a weak institutional environment. Economics Letters,104(3), 118–121.Google Scholar
  49. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper Series (5430). The World Bank.Google Scholar
  50. Kinnaman, T. C. (2006). Policy watch: Examining the justification for residential recycling. Journal of Economic Perspectives,20, 219–232.Google Scholar
  51. Lemos, M. S., & Verissimo, L. (2014). The relationship between intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and achievement, along elementary school. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences,112, 930–938.Google Scholar
  52. Martin, M., Williams, I. D., & Clark, M. (2006). Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,48, 357–395.Google Scholar
  53. Mazzanti, M., & Montini, A. (2014). Waste management beyond the Italian north–south divide: Spatial analyses of geographical, economic and institutional dimensions. In T. C. Kinnaman & K. Takeuchi (Eds.), Handbook on Waste Management (pp. 256–283).Google Scholar
  54. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Nicolli, F. (2009). The dynamics of landfill diversion: economic drivers, policy factors and spatial issue: Evidence From Italy using provincial panel data. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,54, 53–61.Google Scholar
  55. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Nicolli, F. (2011). Embedding landfill diversion in economic, geographical and policy settings. Applied Economics,43(24), 3299–3311.Google Scholar
  56. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Municipal waste generation and socio economic drivers. Evidence from comparing Northern and Southern Italy. The Journal of Environment & Development,17, 51–69.Google Scholar
  57. Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness: Evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,52, 1221–1234.Google Scholar
  58. Miafodzyeva, S., & Brandt, N. (2013). Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization,4(2), 221–235.Google Scholar
  59. Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2014). Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The Case of Italy. Regional Studies,48(10), 1628–1649.Google Scholar
  60. Omran, A., Mahmood, A., Abdul Aziz, H., & Robinson, G. M. (2009). Investigating households attitude toward recycling of solid waste in Malaysia: A case study. International Journal of Environmental Research,3(2), 275–288.Google Scholar
  61. Perrin, D., & Barton, J. (2001). Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: A review of two kerbside recycling schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,33(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
  62. Rogge, N., & De Jaeger, S. (2012). Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing municipal solid waste: A shared input DEA-model. Waste Management,32(10), 1968–1978.Google Scholar
  63. Sarra, A., Mazzocchitti, M., & Rapposelli, A. (2017). Evaluating joint environmental and cost performance in municipal waste management systems through data envelopment analysis: Scale effects and policy implications. Ecological Indicators,73, 756–771.Google Scholar
  64. Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of environmental psychology,15(2), 105–121.Google Scholar
  65. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Simões, P., Carvalho, P., & Marques, R. C. (2012). Performance assessment of refuse collection services using robust efficiency measures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,67, 56–66.Google Scholar
  67. Simões, P., De Witte, K., & Marques, R. C. (2010). Regulatory structures and operational environment in the Portuguese waste sector. Waste Management,30(6), 1130–1137.Google Scholar
  68. Simões, P., & Marques, R. (2012). On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review. Journal of Environmental Management,106(15), 40–47.Google Scholar
  69. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2008). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology,29, 309–317.Google Scholar
  70. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and behavior,27(6), 723–743.Google Scholar
  71. Stevens, G. W. W. (1978). Reduction of waste resulting from mask defects. Solid State Technology,21(8), 68–72.Google Scholar
  72. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Bates, M. P. (2004). Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behavior: Waste minimization compared to recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,42, 27–48.Google Scholar
  73. Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2008). Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors. Ecological Economics,66(4), 559–574.Google Scholar
  74. Zhang, D., Huang, G., Yin, X., & Gong, Q. (2015). Residents’ waste separation behaviors at the source: Using SEM with the theory of planned behavior in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,12(8), 9475–9491.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaetano Musella
    • 1
    Email author
  • Massimiliano Agovino
    • 2
  • Mariaconcetta Casaccia
    • 3
  • Alessandro Crociata
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management and Quantitative StudiesUniversity of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economic and Legal StudiesUniversity of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative SciencesUniversity “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations