Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does risk perception limit the climate change mitigation behaviors?

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to explore the potential mediating effect of risk perception between environmental consciousness, social trust and environmental knowledge to climate change mitigation behaviors and community green activity participation. The data were gathered from various categories of age strata in Klang Valley, Malaysia, from which 210 respondents participated in this study. Factor analysis, partial least squares and structural equation modeling tools were used to achieve these aims. The findings indicate that environmental consciousness and social trust are key predictors of risk perception. However, environment knowledge is not significantly related to risk perception. The proposed mediating influence of risk perceptions on mitigation behaviors and green activity participation are not supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anilan, B. (2014). A study of the environmental risk perceptions and environmental awareness levels of high school students. In Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and teaching (Vol. 15, pp. 1–23). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.

  • Bamber, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. P., Islam, Md. M., & Toma, L. (2013). Heterogeneity in climate change risk perception amongst dairy farmers: A latent class clustering analyses. Applied Geography, 41, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchett, J. H. (2015). Environmental literacy and its implications for effective public policy formation. Baker Scholar Projects. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_bakerschol/2.

  • Carlton, S. J., & Jacobson, S. K. (2013). Climate change and coastal environmental risk perceptions in Florida. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrete, L., Castaño, R., Felix, R., Centeno, E., & González, E. (2012). Green consumer behavior in an emerging economy: Confusion, credibility, and compatibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7), 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and application (pp. 645–689). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, K. T. (2013). The public perception of climate change in Taiwan and its paradigm shift. Energy Policy, 61, 1252–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S., Luebke, J., Saunders, C., Matiasek, J., & Grajal, A. (2014). Connecting to nature at the zoo: Implications for responding to climate change. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.816267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, K. (2015). Exploring the relative influence of knowledge, values and risk perception on engagement in climate change mitigation behaviors (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).

  • Coşkun, A., Vocino, A., & Polonsky, M. (2017). Mediating effect of environmental orientation on pro-environmental purchase intentions in a low-involvement product situation. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 81, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. E., & Lo, C. W. (2003). The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1990). Can we trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4: Article 7.

  • Geneletti, D., & Zardo, L. (2016). Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: An analysis of European urban climate adaptation plans. Land Use Policy, 50, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholami, R., Sulaiman, A., Ramayah, T., & Molla, A. (2013). Managers’ perception on Green Information Systems (IS) adoption and business value: Results from a field survey. Information & Management, 50, 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology and sustainable development: Expansion, maturation, and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26, 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, H., & Kim, Y. (2010). An investigation of green hotel consumers’ decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., et al. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (pp. 277–320). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. C., Lin, T. H., Lai, M. C., & Lin, T. L. (2014). Environmental consciousness and green customer behavior: An examination of motivation crowding effect. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K. H., Stein, L., Heo, C. Y., & Lee, S. (2012). Consumers’ willingness to pay for green initiatives of the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 564–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., et al. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, S. V. D. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. Y. (2013). The role of social norms in climate adaptation: Mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1249–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. E., Martin, I. M., & Kent, B. (2009). The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: The case of wildfire in high risk communities. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, M. P. (2001). Moral economics—Essay on the relation of some economic theories to various moral perspectives, poverty and development: An inter-faith perspective. Oxford: World Faiths Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. (2017). Environmental knowledge and expertise. The International Encyclopedia of Geography. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A. L., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning institutions. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 51, 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005) SmartPLS 2.0.M3. Hamburg: SmartPLS. http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Ross, V. L., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: Testing a social-psychological model. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. (2005). All for one, equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, S., Nejad, Z. P., Mahmoudi, H., & Knierim, A. (2015). Gender, responsible citizenship and global climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum, 50, 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Garrido, J. C., García Lafuente, J., Criado Aldeanueva, F., Baquerizo, A., & Sannino, G. (2008). Time-spatial variability observed in velocity of propagation of the internal bore in the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jc004624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, M. J., & Lafuente, R. (2010). Defining and measuring environmental consciousness. Revista Internacional De Sociologia, 68, 731–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., & Earle, T. C. (2005). Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (2012). Risk perception and societal response. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory (pp. 661–675). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 55, 495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—Or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundblad, E. L., Biel, A., & Garling, T. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgements related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1658–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: UNISDR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. (2000). Psychology of promoting environmentalism: Promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to take this opportunity to thank the data collection assistants and the anonymous respondents that responded to the questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Jalan Multimedia, 63100, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia

    Shay-Wei Choon, Hway-Boon Ong & Siow-Hooi Tan

Authors
  1. Shay-Wei Choon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hway-Boon Ong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siow-Hooi Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shay-Wei Choon.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choon, SW., Ong, HB. & Tan, SH. Does risk perception limit the climate change mitigation behaviors?. Environ Dev Sustain 21, 1891–1917 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0108-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0108-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation