A conceptual framework to assess ecological quality of urban green space: a case study in Mashhad city, Iran

  • Hadi SoltanifardEmail author
  • Elham Jafari


This study evaluates the green space ecological quality with regard to its spatial properties. It investigates how the spatial properties of green space patches affect ecological aspects of municipal green spaces of Mashhad in Iran. The importance and necessity of this investigation is to develop a concept to evaluate the quality of urban green patches based on the perspective and method of landscape ecology. In accordance with our objectives, the quality concept is defined by quantitative (size, area, density) and qualitative (shape, complexity, connectivity) factors as referred to spatial configuration and composition of landscape structure. However, to have a better understanding of the quality concept, we explored the relationship between landscape variables and ecological quality by spatial analysis and correlation tests. We (1) drew the urban green space map by images processing, (2) quantified landscape metrics for the green space patches, (3) analyzed and represented the metric value spatially, (4) calculated ecological quality and drew the grade map, (5) measured the Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression between ecological quality and each landscape metric. Results of this study provided the evidence to study ecological quality by integrating metrics map and analyzing spatial heterogeneity in Mashhad city. Results showed that the extent and continuity of the green spaces were too low to effectively support some key ecological services. Additionally, the Pearson’s correlation coefficients and linear regression revealed strong relationships between ecological quality and most landscape metrics except LSI. Although it was expected that the qualitative variables of green space had higher influence on the ecological quality, quantitative variables had the highest effect due to the origin and nature of the green patches.


Ecological quality Quantitative variable Qualitative variables Landscape metrics Mashhad 


  1. Acar, C., Kurdoglu, B. C., Kurdoglu, O., & Acar, H. (2006). Public preferences for visual quality and management in the Kackar Mountains National Park (Turkey). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 13(6), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 168–192. Scholar
  4. Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience, 53(12), 1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aylor, D. (1972). Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(1B), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baschak, L. A., & Brown, R. D. (1995). An ecological framework for the planning, design and management of urban river greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borrelli, P., Rondón, L. A. S., & Schütt, B. (2013). The use of Landsat imagery to assess large-scale forest cover changes in space and time, minimizing false-positive changes. Applied Geography, 41, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulut, Z., & Yilmaz, H. (2008). Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: A case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141(1–3), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T. A., & Grove, J. M. (2006). Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity, 3, 1–12. Scholar
  10. Chen, B., Adimo, O. A., & Bao, Z. (2009). Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users’ perspective: The case of Hangzhou Flower Garden, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(1), 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., Yu, J., & Khan, S. (2010). Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(12), 1582–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, X.-L., Zhao, H.-M., Li, P.-X., & Yin, Z.-Y. (2006). Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza, R., Arge, R., Groot, R. De, Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’ s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(May), 253–260. Scholar
  15. Costanza, R., & Daly, H. (2003). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46. Scholar
  16. De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. Scholar
  17. De Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. del Castillo, E. M., García-Martin, A., Aladrén, L. A. L., & de Luis, M. (2015). Evaluation of forest cover change using remote sensing techniques and landscape metrics in Moncayo Natural Park (Spain). Applied Geography, 62, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duany, A. (2011). Garden cities: Theory & practice of agrarian urbanism. London: The Prince’s Foundation for the Built Environment.Google Scholar
  20. Dunning, J. B., Stewart, D. J., Danielson, B. J., Noon, B. R., Root, T. L., & Stevens, E. E. (1995). Spatially explicit population models: Current forms and future uses. Ecological Applications, 5(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engen, S., Lande, R., & Bernt-Erik, S. (2002). Migration and spatiotemporal variation in population dynamics in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology, 83(2), 570–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Escobedo, F. J., & Nowak, D. J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90(3), 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fan, C., & Myint, S. (2014). A comparison of spatial autocorrelation indices and landscape metrics in measuring urban landscape fragmentation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 117–128. Scholar
  24. Fang, C.-F., & Ling, D.-L. (2003). Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(4), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Gómez, F., Gil, L., & Jabaloyes, J. (2004). Experimental investigation on the thermal comfort in the city: Relationship with the green areas, interaction with the urban microclimate. Building and Environment, 39(9), 1077–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245. Scholar
  29. Grove, J. M., Troy, A. R., O’Neil-Dunne, J. P. M., Burch, W. R., Jr., Cadenasso, M. L., & Pickett, S. T. A. (2006). Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems, 9(4), 578–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gustafson, E. J. (1998). Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the State of the Art. Ecosystems, 1(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gustafson, E. J., & Parker, G. R. (1992). Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology, 7(2), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haq, S. M. A. (2011). Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2(5), 601–608. Scholar
  33. Hestmark, G. (2000). Temptations of the tree. Nature, 408(6815), 911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W. F., Redman, C. L., Grimm, N. B., et al. (2003). Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 8788–8792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jim, C. Y. (2001). Managing urban trees and their soil envelopes in a contiguously developed city environment. Environmental Management, 28(6), 819–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jim, C. Y. (2013). Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city. Landscape and Urban Planning. Scholar
  37. Johst, K., Drechsler, M., Mewes, M., Sturm, A., & Wätzold, F. (2015). A novel modeling approach to evaluate the ecological effects of timing and location of grassland conservation measures. Biological Conservation, 182, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kong, F., Yin, H., & Nakagoshi, N. (2007). Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., & Zong, Y. (2010). Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1–2), 16–27. Scholar
  40. Kordi, M., & Brandt, S. A. (2012). Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, S.-H., Lee, K.-S., Jin, W.-C., & Song, H.-K. (2009). Effect of an urban park on air temperature differences in a central business district area. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 5(2), 183–191. Scholar
  42. Leitao, Â. B., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, H., Chen, W., & He, W. (2015). Planning of green space ecological network in urban areas: An example of Nanchang, China. Journal of Environ Research and Public Health, 12(10), 12889–12904. Scholar
  44. Li, X., He, H., Bu, R., Wen, Q., Chang, Y., Hu, Y., et al. (2005). The adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns. Pattern Recognition, 38(12), 2626–2638. Scholar
  45. Li, J., Song, C., Cao, L., Zhu, F., Meng, X., & Wu, J. (2011). Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: A case study of Shanghai, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(12), 3249–3263. Scholar
  46. Li, H., & Wu, J. (2004). Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology, 19, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, H., & Shen, Y. (2014). The impact of green space changes on air pollution and microclimates: A case study of the Taipei metropolitan area. Sustainability, 6, 8827–8855. Scholar
  48. Liu, H., & Weng, Q. (2008). Seasonal variations in the relationship between landscape pattern and land surface temperature in Indianapolis, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 144(1–3), 199–219. Scholar
  49. Liu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Urban heat island analysis using the Landsat TM data and ASTER data: A case study in Hong Kong. Remote Sensing, 3(7), 1535–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., De Vries, S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7), 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maimaitiyiming, M., Ghulam, A., Tiyip, T., Pla, F., Latorre-carmona, P., Halik, Ü., et al. (2014). Effects of green space spatial pattern on land surface temperature: Implications for sustainable urban planning and climate change adaptation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 89, 59–66. Scholar
  52. Martin, C. A., Warren, P. S., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004). Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDonald, A. G., Bealey, W. J., Fowler, D., Dragosits, U., Skiba, U., Smith, R. I., et al. (2007). Quantifying the effect of urban tree planting on concentrations and depositions of PM 10 in two UK conurbations. Atmospheric Environment, 41(38), 8455–8467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGarigal, K. (2002). Landscape pattern metrics. In A. H. El-Shaarawi & W. W. Piegorsch (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmentrics (Vol. 2, pp. 1135–1142). New York: Wiley. Scholar
  55. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E. (2002). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Comp. software prog. Univ. Mass., Amherst. Accessed 14 Mar 2015.
  56. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, W., Collins, M. G., Steiner, F. R., & Cook, E. (1998). An approach for greenway suitability analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1655–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morancho, A. B. (2003). A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Computers, environment and urban systems comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54–65. Scholar
  61. Municipality of Mashhad. (2014). Master plan of Mashahd development. Iran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (in Persian).Google Scholar
  62. Nilsson, K., Nielsen, T. S., Aalbers, C., Bell, S., Boitier, B., Chery, J. P., et al. (2014). Strategies for sustainable urban development and urban-rural linkages. European Journal of Spatial Development, 4, 25.Google Scholar
  63. Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Stevens, J. C. (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4(3), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Onishi, A., Cao, X., Ito, T., Shi, F., & Imura, H. (2010). Evaluating the potential for urban heat-island mitigation by greening parking lots. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(4), 323–332. Scholar
  65. Peng, Y., Mi, K., Qing, F., & Xue, D. (2016). Identification of the main factors determining landscape metrics in semi-arid agro-pastoral ecotone. Journal of Arid Environments, 124, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pickett, S. T. A., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2006). Advancing urban ecological studies: Frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral Ecology, 31, 114–125. Scholar
  67. Pickett, S. T. A., & Rogers, K. H. (1997). Patch dynamics: The transformation of landscape structure and function. In J. A. Bissonette (Ed.), Wildlife and landscape ecology effects of pattern and scale (pp. 101–127). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pinfield, G. (1992). Strategic environmental assessment and land-use planning. Project Appraisal, 7(3), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rafiee, R., Salman, A., Khorasani, N., & Asghar, A. (2009a). Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM). Cities, 26(1), 19–26. Scholar
  70. Rafiee, R., Salman Mahiny, A., & Khorasani, N. (2009b). Assessment of changes in urban green spaces of Mashad city using satellite data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 11(6), 431–438. Scholar
  71. Riitters, K. H., O’Neill, R. V., Hunsaker, C. T., Wickham, J. D., Yankee, D. H., Timmins, S. P., et al. (1995). A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, 10(1), 23–39. Scholar
  72. Riitters, K., Vogt, P., Soille, P., & Estreguil, C. (2009). Landscape patterns from mathematical morphology on maps with contagion. Landscape Ecology, 24(5), 699–709. Scholar
  73. Rijsberman, M. A., & Van De Ven, F. H. M. (2000). Different approaches to assessment of design and management of sustainable urban water systems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rostami, R., Lamit, H., Khoshnava, S. M., Rostami, R., Solehin, M., & Rosley, F. (2015). Sustainable cities and the contribution of historical urban green spaces: A case study of historical Persian Gardens. Sustainability, 7, 13290–13316. Scholar
  75. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Juornal of Operational Resaerch, 48, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 175). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Saura, S. (2004). Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices. Landscape Ecology, 19(2), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. SDSN Thematic Group. (2015). Promoting sustainable urban development in Europe-Achievements and Opportunities.,, and Accessed 12 Jan 2016.
  80. Shepard, D. (1968). A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM national conference (pp. 517–524).Google Scholar
  81. Takano, T., Nakamura, K., & Watanabe, M. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: The importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(12), 913–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tian, G. (2002). Urban functional structure characteristics and transformation in China. Cities, 19(4), 243–248. Scholar
  83. Tian, Z., Cao, G., Shi, J., McCallum, I., Cui, L., Fan, D., et al. (2012). Urban transformation of a metropolis and its environmental impacts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 19(5), 1364–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tian, Y., Jim, C. Y., Tao, Y., & Shi, T. (2011). Landscape ecological assessment of green space fragmentation in Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), 79–86. Scholar
  85. Tian, Y., Jim, C. Y., & Wang, H. (2014). Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 97–108. Scholar
  86. Troy, A. R., Grove, J. M., O’Neil-Dunne, J. P. M., Pickett, S. T. A., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2007). Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environmental Management, 40(3), 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner, M. G. (1990). Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology, 4(I), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Turner, M. G., & Romme, W. H. (1994). Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems. Landscape Ecology, 9(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tyrväinen, L., & Miettinen, A. (2000). Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(2), 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. New York.Google Scholar
  91. United Nations Human Settlements. (2009). Global Report on Human Settlements 2009: Planning Sustainable Cities. London, Sterling, VA: UN-Habitat. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
  92. Uuemaa, E., Mander, Ü., & Marja, R. (2013). Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators, 28, 100–106. Scholar
  93. Uuemaa, E., Roosaare, J., Oja, T., & Mander, Ü. (2011). Analysing the spatial structure of the Estonian landscapes: which landscape metrics are the most suitable for comparing different landscapes? Estonian Journal of Ecology, 60(1), 70. Scholar
  94. Uy, P. D., & Nakagoshi, N. (2008). Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban greenspace planning in Hanoi, Vietnam. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Van Renterghem, T., Botteldooren, D., & Verheyen, K. (2012). Road traffic noise shielding by vegetation belts of limited depth. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331(10), 2404–2425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wagner, H. E. H. W., & Fortin, M.-J. (2005). Spatial analysis of landscapes: Concepts and statistics. Ecology, 86(8), 1975–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weng, Q., Lu, D., & Schubring, J. (2004). Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89(4), 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wiens, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3(4), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Landscape and urban planning urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. Scholar
  100. Wu, J. (2004). Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wu, J. (2014). Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 209–221. Scholar
  102. Wu, J., He, C., Huang, G., & Yu, D. (2013). Urban landscape ecology: Past, present, and future. In Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture (pp. 37–53). Berlin: Springer.
  103. Wu, J., Shen, W., Sun, W., & Tueller, P. T. (2002). Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 17(8), 761–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Xu, H. (2014). Ecological quality assessment of urban green spaces based on landscape metrics: A case of Nanjing, China. Computer Modeling & New Technologies, 18(12A), 384–391.Google Scholar
  105. Ying, X., Guang-ming, Z., Gui-qiu, C., & Lin, T. (2007). Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—A case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecological Modelling, 209, 97–109. Scholar
  106. Zhang, L., Wu, J., Zhen, Y., & Shu, J. (2004). RETRACTED: A GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zhao, M., Kong, Z., Escobedo, F. J., & Gao, J. (2010). Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(4), 807–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhou, W., Huang, G., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2011). Landscape and urban planning does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1), 54–63. Scholar
  109. Zhou, X., & Wang, Y.-C. (2011). Spatial–temporal dynamics of urban green space in response to rapid urbanization and greening policies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(3), 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Geography and Environmental SciencesHakim Sabzevari UniversitySabzevarIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations