Indigenous capacity for collaboration in Canada’s energy, forestry and mining sectors: research metrics and trends
- 417 Downloads
This paper examines patterns in recently published research addressing Indigenous capacity for collaborative natural resource development in Canada’s forestry, energy, and mining sectors. As Indigenous involvement in natural resource development increases, so too does the body of associated scholarship. We gathered information on several core metrics (year of publication, authorship, and gender, author affiliation, journal titles, citation counts and impacts factors, and keywords) to analyze research output, trends, and gaps. Our bibliometric analysis of 49 articles from peer-reviewed journals confirms that Indigenous natural resource development and capacity research has steadily increased over the past decade in terms of the number and range of papers, authors, institutions, and cases examined. Research output peaked in 2013 and 2015. Authorship is distributed evenly between male and female lead researchers, with teams located across southern Canada, with highest concentrations in urban population centers of British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. In contrast, the research sites are located in more northern, rural, and remote locations. That communities and projects under study are not currently matched with sites of research capacity raises questions about capacity building and the nature of research “on” versus “with” Indigenous peoples. Policies and programs designed to enhance Indigenous involvement and capacity must address these asymmetries in order to be representative, effective, and responsive to current Indigenous priorities.
KeywordsAboriginal Indigenous Capacity Energy Forestry Mining Bibliometric
This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
- Allen, T., & Krogman, N. (2013). Aboriginal content in professional forestry curriculum. Aboriginal Peoples and Forest Lands in Canada, p. 279.Google Scholar
- Bocking, S. (2016). Science and Canadian environmental policy. In D. VanNijnatten (Ed.), Canadian environmental policy and politics: The challenges of austerity and ambivalence (4th ed., pp. 97–111). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bone, R. (1992). The geography of the Canadian north: Issues and challenges. Toronto, Ontario: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Coates, K., & Crowley, B. (2013). New beginnings: How Canada’s natural resource wealth could re-shape relations with Aboriginal people. Macdonald-Laurier Institute.Google Scholar
- Fitzpatrick, P., & McAllister, M. L. (2015). Canadian mineral resource development: A resilient and sustainable enterprise? In B. Mitchell (Ed.), Resource and environmental management in Canada: Addressing conflict and uncertainty (5th ed., pp. 402–424). Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J. (2015). Mining and communities in Northern Canada: History, politics, and memory. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2010). Aboriginal-mining company contractual agreements in Australia and Canada: Implications for political autonomy and community development. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 30(1–2), 69–86.Google Scholar
- Rousseau, R. (2001). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations within the country? A case study. In F. Havemann, R. Wagner-Döbler, & H. Kretschmer (eds.), Proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on scientometrics and informetrics, pp. 173–176.Google Scholar
- Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. (1996). People to people, nation to nation: Highlights from the report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
- Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary first nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.Google Scholar
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation commission of Canada. http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Honouring_the_Truth_Reconciling_for_the_Future_July_23_2015.pdf.
- Wellstead, A. (2007). The (post) staples economy and the (post) staples state in historical perspective. Canadian Political Science Review, 1(1), 8–25.Google Scholar
- Wyatt, S., Fortier, J., Natcher, D. C., Smith, M. A., & Hébert, M. (2013). Collaboration between Aboriginal peoples and the Canadian forest sector: A typology of arrangements for establishing control and determining benefits of forestlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar