Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 895–915 | Cite as

Determinants of adoption of sustainable production practices among smallholder coffee producers in Nicaragua

  • Aniseh S. BroEmail author
  • Daniel C. Clay
  • David L. Ortega
  • Maria C. Lopez
Article

Abstract

Efforts to slow down and eventually reverse the trend of climate change will take time, and in some cases, the negative impacts of climate change will be felt long before long-term solutions to this problem can bear fruit. Adaptation and mitigation strategies constitute the front line of attack for rural households in developing countries that rely on agricultural production and natural resource use as their main source of income and growth, and whose livelihoods are threatened by climate change. This study models the determinants of adoption of sustainable production practices by coffee producers in the department of Matagalpa, in northern Nicaragua. Using primary survey data, we analyze the extent to which cooperative membership impacts adoption of ten different practices. We find that coffee farmers who belong to cooperatives have adopted sustainable practices at higher rates than non-members, and that the odds of adoption are higher for members than for non-members. A factor analysis was conducted to determine the underlying structural differences between the ten practices, and from this analysis three factors emerged and were modeled. We find that cooperative membership is a significant determinant of practices that promote water conservation, yet not significant for practices that promote soil and plant health, nor for practices related to field management. These findings are valuable for policy makers, donors, and development and extension practitioners in the coffee sector, as they can better inform and guide policies toward more efficient and effective paths of long-term climate change adaptation.

Keywords

Technology adoption Climate change Coffee Cooperatives Sustainable development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development and Purdue University through their Borlaug Fellowship in Global Food Security.

References

  1. Abate, G. T., Francesconi, G. N., & Getnet, K. (2014). Impact of agricultural cooperatives on smallholders’ technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abebaw, D., & Haile, M. G. (2013). The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 38, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araral, E. (2013). A transaction cost approach to climate adaptation: Insights from Coase, Ostrom and Williamson and evidence from the 400-year old zangjeras. Environmental Science & Policy, 25, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Attwood, D. M., & Baviskar, B. S. (1987). Why do some co-operatives work but not others? A comparative analysis of sugar co-operatives in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 22, A38–A56.Google Scholar
  6. Baca, M., Läderach, P., Haggar, J., Schroth, G., & Ovalle, O. (2014). An integrated framework for assessing vulnerability to climate change and developing adaptation strategies for coffee growing families in Mesoamerica. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacon, C. M. (2005). Confronting the coffee crisis: Can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua? World Development, 33(3), 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bacon, C. M. (2010). A spot of coffee in crisis: Nicaraguan smallholder cooperatives, fair trade networks, and gendered empowerment. Latin American Perspectives, 37(2), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bacon, C. M., Sundstrom, W. A., Gómez, M. E. F., Méndez, V. E., Santos, R., Goldoftas, B., et al. (2014). Explaining the ‘hungry farmer paradox’: Smallholders and fair trade cooperatives navigate seasonality and change in Nicaragua’s corn and coffee markets. Global Environmental Change, 25, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrett, C. B. (2008). Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy, 33(4), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard, T., & Spielman, D. J. (2009). Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 34(1), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bro, A., & Clay, D. C. (2017). Transforming Burundi’s coffee sector through strategic value chain investments. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 7(3), 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruce, J., Burton, I., Martin, H., Mills, B., & Mortsch, L. (2000). Water sector: Vulnerability and adaptation to climate change, Final Report. Global Change Strategies International Inc. and Atmospheric Environment Service, 141 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Donovan, J., & Poole, N. (2014). Changing asset endowments and smallholder participation in higher value markets: Evidence from certified coffee producers in Nicaragua. Food Policy, 44, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fayet, L., & Vermeulen, W. J. (2014). Supporting smallholders to access sustainable supply chains: Lessons from the Indian cotton supply chain. Sustainable Development, 22(5), 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferris, S., Robbins, P., Best, R., Seville, D., Buxton, A., & Shriver, J. (2014). Linking smallholder farmers to markets and the implications for extension and advisory services. MEAS Brief, 4(10), 13–14.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, G., Shah, M. M., & van Velthuizen, H. T. (2002). Climate change and agricultural vulnerability. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012). Linking smallholders to markets: Determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Development, 40(6), 1255–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giuliani, E., Ciravegna, L., Vezzulli, A., & Kilian, B. (2017). Decoupling standards from practice: The impact of in-house certifications on coffee farms’ environmental and social conduct. World Development, 96, 294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gourdji, S., Craig, M., Shirley, R., Ponce de Leon Barido, D., Campos, E., Giraldo, M. (2014). Sustainable development opportunities at the climate, land, energy, and water nexus in Nicaragua. Center for Latin American Studies, Working Paper 33.Google Scholar
  21. Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2010). The future of small farms: Trajectories and policy priorities. World Development, 38(10), 1349–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hellin, J., Lundy, M., & Meijer, M. (2009). Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy, 34(1), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holloway, G., Nicholson, C., Delgado, C., Staal, S., & Ehui, S. (2000). Agroindustrialization through institutional innovation Transaction costs, cooperatives and milk-market development in the east-African highlands. Agricultural Economics, 23(3), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014–Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Regional aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. James, A., & Madaki, J. (2014). Roles of farmers’ cooperatives in agricultural development in Sabuwa Local Government Area of Katsina State, Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(12), 80–87.Google Scholar
  27. Jansen, H. G., Pender, J., Damon, A., Wielemaker, W., & Schipper, R. (2006). Policies for sustainable development in the hillside areas of Honduras: A quantitative livelihoods approach. Agricultural Economics, 34(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jena, P. R., Chichaibelu, B. B., Stellmacher, T., & Grote, U. (2012). The impact of coffee certification on small-scale producers’ livelihoods: A case study from the Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 43(4), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jurjonas, M., Crossman, K., Solomon, J., & Baez, W. L. (2016). Potential links between certified organic coffee and deforestation in a protected area in Chiapas, Mexico. World Development, 78, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kodama, Y. (2007). New role of cooperatives in Ethiopia: The case of Ethiopian coffee farmers cooperatives. African Study Monographs, 35(Suppl.), 87–108.Google Scholar
  31. Kroeker, C. J. (1996). The cooperative movement in Nicaragua: Empowerment and accompaniment of severely disadvantaged peasants. Journal of Social Issues, 52(1), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laderach, P., Lundy, M., Jarvis, A., Ramirez, J., Portilla, E. P., Schepp, K. (2011). Predicted impact of climate change on coffee supply chains. In The economic, social and political elements of climate change (pp. 703–723). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Laderäch, P., Zelaya, C., Ovalle, O., Garcia, S., Eitzinger, A., & Baca, M. (2013). Escenarios del Impacto del Clima Futuro en Areas de Cultivo de Cafe en Nicaragua. CIAT Blog. Web. http://dapa.ciat.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Informe-Nicaragua-final.pdf.
  34. Le, Q., Wild, B., & Jackels, S. (2017). The case of Café Ambiental, SPC: A new business model for a Nicaraguan fair trade cooperative. World Development Perspectives, 6, 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lobell, D. B., Bänziger, M., Magorokosho, C., & Vivek, B. (2011). Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Louhaichi, M., et al. (2016). Financial incentives: Possible options for sustainable rangeland management? Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma, W., & Abdulai, A. (2016). Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from apple farmers in China. Food Policy, 58, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendez, V. E., Bacon, C. M., Olson, M., Morris, K. S., & Shattuck, A. (2010). Agrobiodiversity and shade coffee smallholder livelihoods: A review and synthesis of ten years of research in Central America. The Professional Geographer, 62(3), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mwamakamba, S. N., Sibanda, L. M., Pittock, J., Stirzaker, R., Bjornlund, H., van Rooyen, A., et al. (2017). Irrigating Africa: Policy barriers and opportunities for enhanced productivity of smallholder farmers. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(5), 824–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nandi, R., Bokelmanna, W., Nithya, V. G., & Dias, G. (2015). Smallholder organic farmer’s attitudes, objectives and barriers towards production of organic fruits and vegetables in India: A multivariate analysis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 27(5), 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Narrod, C., Roy, D., Okello, J., Avendaño, B., Rich, K., & Thorat, A. (2009). Public–private partnerships and collective action in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains. Food Policy, 34(1), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson, G. C., Rosegrant, M. W., Koo, J., Robertson, R., Sulser, T., Zhu, T., et al. (2009). Climate change: Impact on agriculture and costs of adaptation (Vol. 21). International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Neven, D., Reardon, T., & Hopkins, R. (2005). Case studies of farmer linking to dynamic markets in Southern Africa: The Fort Hare Farmers Group. Mimeo: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  44. Nyangena, W. (2008). Social determinants of soil and water conservation in rural Kenya. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(6), 745–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ovalle-Rivera, O., Läderach, P., Bunn, C., Obersteiner, M., & Schroth, G. (2015). Projected shifts in Coffea arabica suitability among major global producing regions due to climate change. PLoS One, 10(4), e0124155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perfecto, I., Armbrecht, I., Philpott, S. M., Soto-Pinto, L., & Dietsch, T. V. (2007). Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in northern Latin America. In Stability of tropical rainforest margins (pp. 225–261) Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Perfecto, I., Rice, R. A., Greenberg, R., & Van der Voort, M. E. (1996). Shade coffee: A disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience, 46, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petrin, A., & Train, K. (2010). A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ponte, S. (2002). The ‘latte revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Development, 30(7), 1099–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rijkers, B., Laderchi, C. R., Teal, F. (2008). Who benefits from promoting small and medium scale enterprises? Some empirical evidence from Ethiopia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  51. Ruben, R., & Lerman, Z. (2005). Why Nicaraguan peasants stay in agricultural production cooperatives. ERLACS.Google Scholar
  52. Ruben, R., & Zuniga, G. (2011). How standards compete: Comparative impact of coffee certification schemes in Northern Nicaragua. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tatlıdil, F. F., Boz, İ., & Tatlidil, H. (2009). Farmers’ perception of sustainable agriculture and its determinants: A case study in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(6), 1091–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tendler, J. (1983). What to think about cooperatives: A guide from Bolivia. Washington: Inter-American Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Uphoff, N. (1993). Grassroots organizations and NGOs in rural development: Opportunities with diminishing states and expanding markets. World Development, 21(4), 607–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. USDA Foreign Agricultural Services. (2015). Coffee Annual Report Nicaragua. GAIN Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  57. Valkila, J. (2009). Fair Trade organic coffee production in Nicaragua—Sustainable development or a poverty trap? Ecological Economics, 68(12), 3018–3025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Rikxoort, H., Schroth, G., Läderach, P., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, B. (2014). Carbon footprints and carbon stocks reveal climate-friendly coffee production. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2014a). Smallholder cooperatives and agricultural performance in Rwanda: Do organizational differences matter? Agricultural Economics, 45(S1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2014b). Can agricultural cooperatives reduce poverty? Heterogeneous impact of cooperative membership on farmers’ welfare in Rwanda. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 37, ppu021.Google Scholar
  61. Vermeulen, S. J., Challinor, A. J., Thornton, P. K., Campbell, B. M., Eriyagama, N., Vervoort, J. M., et al. (2013). Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8357–8362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Virapongse, A., Brooks, S., Metcalf, E. C., Zedalis, M., Gosz, J., Kliskey, A., et al. (2016). A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 178, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weber, J. G. (2011). How much more do growers receive for Fair Trade-organic coffee? Food Policy, 36(5), 678–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wollni, M., Lee, D. R., & Thies, J. E. (2010). Conservation agriculture, organic marketing, and collective action in the Honduran hillsides. Agricultural Economics, 41(3-4), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wollni, M., & Zeller, M. (2007). Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica. Agricultural Economics, 37(2-3), 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aniseh S. Bro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel C. Clay
    • 1
  • David L. Ortega
    • 2
  • Maria C. Lopez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Community SustainabilityMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource EconomicsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations