A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact
- 390 Downloads
In today’s competitive market, corporations have learned that taking sustainability issues into account can significantly improve their public image. Modern producers therefore must simultaneously reduce the environmental impact of their products and make economic gains. Therefore, making trade-offs between economic and environmental issues is required to ensure a company’s continuity. In doing so, companies have attached a great deal of importance to the new product design phase. However, optimization at the design stage becomes very complex for a product with a large number of parts, which can have several design alternatives with similar forms and functionality, but different costs and environmental impacts. In the automobile, shipbuilding and aircraft industries, if the conventional complete enumeration method is applied, the time required for selecting the optimal combination of design alternatives with respect to life cycle cost and environmental impact may exceed a human’s natural life span. To overcome this limitation, this paper introduces an optimization method for use as a design aid tool that enables a designer to assess the life cycle cost and environmental impact of his/her design very early in the product development process. To support the developed method, an illustration is provided using a case study on a locally manufactured automobile.
KeywordsSustainable product design New product development Life cycle assessment Carbon footprint Optimization method Automotive industry
The authors would like to thank SAPCO, the exclusive supplier of parts for IKCO, for providing the required information about parts. We are also thankful to Thinkstep for providing the GaBi software package for our calculations.
- Behdad, S., & Thurston, D. (2012). Disassembly and reassembly sequence planning tradeoffs under uncertainty for product maintenance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134, 1–9.Google Scholar
- EU commission (2016). Reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Climate Action. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars/index_en.htm. Accessed in Sept 2016.
- Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2014). Decision analysis for management judgment (5th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schneider, L., Schröder, K., & Teipel, F. (2015). Assessing environmental and social impacts. Econsense—Forum for Sustainable Development of German Business.Google Scholar
- Schuller, O., Hassel, F., Kokborg, M., Thylmann, D., Stoffregen, A., Schöll, S., et al. (2013). GaBi database and modelling principles 2013. Leinfelden–Echterdingen: PE International AG.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Valkama, J., & Keskinen, M. (2008). Comparison of simplified LCA variations for three LCA cases of electronic products from the ecodesign point of view. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, May 19–22.Google Scholar
- Whitney, D. E. (2004). Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar