Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1127–1140 | Cite as

Methodological characteristics of sustainability science: a systematic review

  • Walter Alfredo Salas-Zapata
  • Leonardo Alberto Ríos-Osorio
  • Jaiberth Antonio Cardona-Arias


Sustainability science has emerged as a research program and a scientific trend that directs all efforts to promote transition of societies toward sustainability. The style of research proposed to tackle unsustainability issues should be characterized by the application of a systems approach, as well as transdisciplinarity, participation, generation of social learning and a problem-solving perspective. However, whether such traits are being actually implemented has not been determined. Furthermore, a mature science is expected to have coherent research typologies, besides a scientific community and shared theoretical assumptions and methodological prescriptions; such types or research on sustainability science is still unknown. This systematic review aimed at analyzing research papers on sustainability carried out in 2013. Three aspects were studied: the scientific community, the theoretical assumptions on the concept of sustainability and the methodological design. Results suggest that the scientific community comes from disciplines different to sustainability, the researchers tend not to define the concept of sustainability and among those who do, and there is a lack of shared assumptions. The present analysis also showed that research on sustainability has not implemented the methodological characteristics mentioned and coherent method typologies were not found. These aspects hinder sustainability science evolution and maturity, given the difficulty to construct theories and consolidate a scientific community that develops coherent methods on such grounds.


Sustainability science Methodology Epistemology Paradigm Principles 


  1. Bettencourt, L., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. PNAS, 108(49), 19540–19545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brockhaus, S., Kersten, W., & Knemeyer, M. (2013). Where Do We Go From Here? Progressing Sustainability Implementation Efforts Across Supply Chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R. R., Deletic, A., & Wong, T. H. F. (2015). How to catalyze collaboration. Nature, 525, 315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, t. (2012). Manual cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones. http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269.
  5. Chalmers, A. (1999). ¿Qué es esa cosa llamada ciencia?. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, W., & Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. PNAS, 100(14), 8059–8061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Claro, D. P., Laban Neto, S. A., & de Oliveira Claro, P. B. (2013). Sustainability drivers in food retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3), 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. USA: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernandez-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación (4ta ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana.Google Scholar
  11. Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Anderberg, S., Baier, M., Clark, E., et al. (2011). Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiménez, L. (2008). Desarrollo sostenible (2nd ed.). Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
  13. Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kajikawa, Y., Tacoa, F., & Yamaguchi, K. (2014). Sustainability science: The changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 9, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kataria, A., Kataria, A., & Garg, R. (2013). Effective internal communication: a way Towards Sustainability. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 6(2), 46–52.Google Scholar
  16. Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T. (2006). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Mexico DF: Fondo de cultura económica.Google Scholar
  18. Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(1), 36–41.Google Scholar
  19. Olayide, O. E., Popoola, L., Olaniyan, O., Dapilah, F., & Abudulai Issahaku, R. Y. (2013). Assessing the transition from survival to sustainability: case of wechiau community hippo sanctuary in upper west region of Ghana, West Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(10), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parisi, C. (2013). The Impact of Organisational Alignment on the Effectiveness of Firms Sustainability Strategic Performance Measurement Systems: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rapport, D. (2007). Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective. Sustainability Science, 2(1), 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salas-Zapata, W., & Rios-Osorio, L. (2013). Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 4(1), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sterman, J. (2012). Sustaining sustainability: Creating a systems science in a fragmented academy and polarized world. In M. Weinstein & R. E. Turner (Eds.), Sustainability science: The emerging paradigm and the urban environment (pp. 21–58). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: Una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135, 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Viaggi, D., Raggi, M., & Gomez y Paloma, S. (2013). Modelling and interpreting the impact of policy and price scenarios on farm-household sustainability: Farming systems vs. result-driven clustering. Environmental Modelling & Software, 43, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group on Health and Sustainability, School of MicrobiologyUniversity of AntioquiaMedellínColombia
  2. 2.Department of MedicineCooperative University of ColombiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations