Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 839–855 | Cite as

Is the Clean Development Mechanism delivering benefits to the poorest communities in the developing world? A critical evaluation and proposals for reform

  • Jo Dirix
  • Wouter Peeters
  • Sigrid Sterckx
Article

Abstract

This paper explores whether the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), a flexibility mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol, has contributed to poverty alleviation in countries that host CDM projects. We argue that the CDM should deliver pro-poor benefits to the communities in which projects are established, since poverty alleviation is integral to sustainable development, which is one of the main purposes of the CDM. After briefly discussing the background of the CDM, we discuss assessment difficulties to which research is prone when evaluating CDM projects for alleged sustainable development contributions. Section 4 brings together and analyses available empirical research on the pro-poor benefits the CDM purportedly delivers to host country communities, concluding that the CDM has failed to deliver poverty alleviation. Therefore, without attempting to be exhaustive, we suggest policy reforms that aim to redirect the CDM to those most in need of assistance.

Keywords

Climate change Clean Development Mechanism Sustainability Poverty 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Julian Cockbain and Peter Tom Jones

References

  1. Alexeew, J., Bergset, L., Meyer, K., Petersen, J., Schneider, L., & Unger, C. (2010). An analysis of the relationship between the additionality of CDM and their contribution to sustainable development. International Environmental Agreements, 10, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd, E., & Goodman, M. (2011). The clean development mechanism as ethical development? Reconciling emissions trading and local development. Journal of International Development, 23, 836–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, E., Hultman, N. E., Roberts, J. T., Corbera, E., Cole, J., Bozmoski, A., Ebeling, J., Tippman, R., Mann, P., Brown, K., Liverman, D. M. (2009). Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: Lessons learned and policy futures. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 820–831. Retrieved from http://www.environment.arizona.edu/files/env/profiles/liverman/boyd-etal-esp-20090.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  4. Brunt, C., & Knechtel, A. (2005). Delivering sustainable development benefits through the Clean Development Mechanism. The Pembina Institute. Retrieved from http://www.pembina.org/pub/207. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  5. Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Caney, S. (2010). Markets, morality and climate change: What, if anything, is wrong with emissions trading? New Political Economy, 15(2), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2009). State and trends of the carbon market. World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTCARBONFINANCE/Resources/State_and_Trends_of_the_Carbon_Market_2009-FINALb.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  8. Casillas, C., & Kammen, D. (2010). The energy–poverty–climate nexus. Science, 330, 1181–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro, P., & Michaelowa, A. (2010). The impact of discounting emission credits on the competitiveness of different CDM host countries. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CDMGS. (2015). The Clean Development Mechanism Gold Standard website. http://www.cdmgoldstandard.org. Accessed February 14, 2015.
  11. Chen, K., & Reklev, S. (2014). China approves 1st offset projects to supply domestic CO2 markets. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/26/china-carbonoffset-idUSL5N0MN4AU20140326. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  12. Chung, R. K. (2007). A CER discounting scheme could save the climate change regime after 2012. Climate Policy, 7, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crowe, T. L. (2013). The potential of the CDM to deliver pro-poor benefits. Climate Policy, 13(1), 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das, K. (2011). Technology transfer under the Clean Development Mechanism: An empirical study of 1000 CDM projects. The Governance of Clean Development, Working Paper 014. UK: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  15. DECC. (2013). Policy statement with respect to applications for letters of approval to the UK Designated National Authority under Clean Development Mechanism Methodology ACM0013. Department of Energy & Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226435/CD24309E.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  16. Disch, D. (2010). A comparative analysis of the ‘development dividend’ of Clean Development Mechanism projects in six host countries. Climate and Development, 2, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Djanibekov, U., Khamzina, A., Djanibekov, N., & Lamers, J. (2012). How attractive are short-term CDM forestations in arid regions? The case of irrigated croplands in Uzbekistan. Forest Policy and Economics, 21, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drupp, M. (2011). Does the Gold Standard label hold its promise in delivering higher Sustainable Development benefits? A multi-criteria comparison of CDM projects. Energy Policy, 39, 1213–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. du Monceau, T., & Brohé, A. (2011). Sustainable development and social equity. Briefing paper. AEA, energy and climate change consultancy. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/linking/docs/sustainable_development_en.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2013.
  20. Erickson, P., & Lazarus, M. (2011). Implications of international greenhouse gas offsets on global climate mitigation. Working Paper WP-US-1106. Stockholm Environmental Institute. Retrieved from http://sei-us.org/Publications_PDF/SEI-WorkingPaperUS-1106.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  21. European Commission. (2014). Questions and answers on 2030 framework on climate and energy. Brussels: European Commission Memo 22/01/2014. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-40_et.htm. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  22. European Council. (2014). Conclusions on the 2030 Climate Energy Policy Framework. Note 79/14, 23 October 2014. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/145356.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2014.
  23. European Parliament and the Council of the EU. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L275, 32–46.Google Scholar
  24. Fenhann, J. (2011). UNEP Risoe CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis and Database, June 1st, 2011. http://cdmpipeline.org.
  25. Fuhr, H., & Lederer, M. (2009). Varieties of carbon governance in newly industrializing countries. The Journal of Environmental Development, 18, 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillenwater, M., & Seres, S. (2011). The Clean Development Mechanism, a review of the first international offset program. PEW Center on Global Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/clean-development-mechanism-review-of-first-international-offset-program.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2013.
  27. Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhmann, M. C., Shyamsundar, P., et al. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grubb, M. (2013). Doha’s dawn? Climate Policy, 13(3), 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guha-Sapir, D., Vos, F., Below, R., & Ponserre, S. (2012) Annual disaster statistical review 2011: The numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
  30. Haya, B. (2009). Measuring emissions against an alternative future: Fundamental flaws in the structure of the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism. Working Paper No. 09-001. US: Energy and Resources Group, University of California. Retrieved from http://erg.berkeley.edu/working_paper/2009/ERG09-001.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  31. Hoornweg, D., Sugar, L., Freire, M., Anderson, C., Bhada, P., Trejos, C. L., Dave, R., & Lee, M. (2010). Cities and climate change: An urgent agenda. USA: World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Killick, R. (2012). Exploring the measurement of sustainable development in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Working Paper No. 19. School of International Development, University of East Anglia. Retrieved from http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gcd_working_paper_019_-_killick_2012.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  33. Lazarus, E., Erickson, P., & Schneider, L. (2013). Potential for International Offsets to provide a net Decrease of GHG Emissions. Working Paper 2013-06. Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute. Retrieved from http://www.sei-international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate/SEI-WP-2013-06-New-Market-Mechanisms.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  34. Liu, Z., Guan, D., Crawford-Brown, D., Zhang, Q., He, K., & Liu, J. (2013). A low-carbon road map for China. Nature, 500, 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lloyd, B., & Subbarao, S. (2009). Development challenges under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)—can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil? Energy Policy, 37, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinez, C., & Bowen, J. (2013). The ethical challenges of the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 807–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McMichael, A. J. (2013). Globalization, climate change, and human health. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 1335–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murphy, K. (2013). Abbott on carbon trading: ‘Non-delivery of an invisible substance to no one’. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/15/abbott-carbon-trading-invisible-substance. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  39. Neumayer, E. (2010). Human development and sustainability. Human development research paper 2010/05. US: UNDP, United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-and-sustainability. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  40. Neumayer, E. (2013). Human development and sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(4), 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newell, P. (2009). Varieties of CDM governance: Some reflections. The Journal of Environment & Development, 18(4), 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newell, P., & Bumpus, A. (2012). The global political ecology of the clean development mechanism. Global Environmental Politics, 12(4), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newell, P., Jenner, N., & Baker, L. (2009). Governing clean development: A framework for analysis. The Governance of Clean Development Working Paper 001. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia. Retrieved from http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/GCD_WorkingPaper001.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  44. Newell, P., Phillips, J., & Mulvaney, D. (2011). Pursuing clean energy equitably. Human Development Research paper 2011/03. US: UNDP, United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/pursuing-clean-energy-equitably. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  45. Nussbaumer, P. (2009). On the contribution of labeled Certified Emission Reductions to sustainable development: A multi-criteria evaluation of CDM projects. Energy Policy, 37, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsen, K. (2007). The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: A review of the literature. Climatic Change, 84, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olsen, K., & Fenhann, J. (2008). Sustainable development benefits of clean development mechanism projects: A new methodology for sustainability assessment based on text analysis of the projects design documents submitted for validation. Energy Policy, 36, 2819–2830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olssen, L., Opondo, M., & Tschakert, P. (2014) Chapter 13: Livelihoods and Poverty. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Biller, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, L. L. White (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Volume I: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–57). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/. Accessed December 11, 2014.
  49. Ott, H. E., & Sachs, W. (2000). Ethical aspects of emissions trading. Wuppertal Papers Nr. 110. Contribution to the World Council of Churches Consultation on ‘Equity and Emissions Trading—Ethical and Theological Dimensions’, May 9–14, Saskatoon. Retrieved from http://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1075. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  50. Pearson, B. (2007). Market failure: Why the Clean Development Mechanism won’t promote clean development. Journal of Clean Production, 15, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peeters, W., Dirix, J., & Sterckx, S. (2013). Putting sustainability into sustainable human development. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 58–76.Google Scholar
  52. Rive, N., & Rübbelke, D. (2010). International environmental policy and poverty alleviation. Review of World Economics, 146, 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schneider, L. (2011). Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: Practical experiences and lessons learned. Climate Policy, 9(3), 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schneider, L., & Grashof, K. (2007). Capacity development for the Clean Development Mechanism. Lessons Learned in Ghana, India, Indonesia, South Africa. Germany: Öko-Institut and GTZ Climate Protection Programme & Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany. Retrieved from http://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/577/2006-135-en.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  55. Sirohi, S. (2007). CDM: Is it a ‘win–win’ strategy for rural poverty alleviation in India? Climatic Change, 84, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sterk, W. (2011). Response by the Wuppertal Institute to the CDM Executive Board Call for Public Inputs on Sustainability Benefits. Germany: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy. Retrieved from http://cdm.unfccc.int/public_inputs/2011/sustainability_benefits/cfi/KRAJ7EAZ1CE0ICPE0HA8PU7I1ZQFTU. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  57. Sterk, W., Rudolph, F., Arens, C., Eichhorst, U., Kiyar, D., Wang-Helmreich, H., Swiderski, M. (2009). Further development of the project-based mechanisms in a Post-2012 Regime. Final Report of the project Commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. Retrieved from http://wupperinst.org/en/projects/details/wi/p/s/pd/298/. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  58. Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: The Clean Development Mechanism. Journal of Environment & Development, 13(3), 295–322. Retrieved from http://www.gppi.net/fileadmin/gppi/New_Partnerships_Streck.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  59. Subbarao, S., & Lloyd, B. (2011). Can the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver? Energy Policy, 39, 1600–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sutter, C., & Parreño, J. C. (2007). Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Climatic Change, 84, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tyler, S., & Moench, M. (2012). A framework for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development, 4(4), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UN. (1992). United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC. United Nations. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  63. UN. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. United Nations. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  64. UN. (2012). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly: The future we want (A/RES/66/288). United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288&Lang=E. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  65. UNCED. (1992a). The Rio declaration on environment and development. Brazil: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/nfsunesco/pdf/RIO_E.PDF. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  66. UNCED. (1992b). Agenda 21. Brazil: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  67. UNFCCC. (2002). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Part One: Proceedings (FCCC/CP/2001/13). Germany: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  68. UNFCCC. (2012). Benefits from the CDM. Germany: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/dev_ben/index.html. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  69. Wara, M. (2007). Is the global carbon market working? Nature, 445, 595–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wara, M. (2008). Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism’s performance and potential. UCLA Law Review, 55(6), 1759–1804.Google Scholar
  71. WCED. (1987). Our common future. Brundtland Report. World Commission on Environment and Development. US: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://conspect.nl/pdf/Our_Common_Future-Brundtland_Report_1987.pdf. [Accessed 1 April 2014].
  72. Wood, R. (2011). Carbon finance and pro-poor co-benefits: The Gold Standard and Climate, Community and Biodiversity Standards. Sustainable markets discussion paper No. 4. London: IIED, International Institute for Environment and Development. Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/15521IIED.html. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  73. World Bank. (2014). State and trends of carbon pricing. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/05/19572833/state-trends-carbon-pricing-2014. Accessed December 11, 2014.
  74. World Bank/IEA. (2013). Global tracking framework. World Bank and the International Energy Agency. Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/name,38535,en.html. Accessed April 1, 2014.
  75. Zhu, J. (2013). Assessing China’s discriminative tax on Clean Development Mechanism projects. Does China’s tax have so many functions? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.750236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Moral SciencesFree University of Brussels (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.NieuwerkerkenBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Philosophy and Moral SciencesFree University of Brussels (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Philosophy and Moral SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  5. 5.Department of Philosophy and Moral SciencesFree University of Brussels (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations