Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 197–219 | Cite as

Examining green public procurement using content analysis: existing difficulties for procurers and useful recommendations

  • Francesco Testa
  • Paolo Grappio
  • Natalia M. Gusmerotti
  • Fabio Iraldo
  • Marco Frey
Article

Abstract

Green public procurement (GPP) promises great potential for improving the environmental impact of many public organizations. However, the effects this instrument will have in the near future are unclear as there is little evidence on its exact level of engagement. This study thus aims to analyze the contents of tenders in terms of green criteria by specifically focusing on the building and construction sector. A total of 164 Italian public tenders were analyzed according to a protocol of analysis based on the GPP toolkit developed by the European Commission. Starting from a content analysis used in previous studies, a complete list of green criteria was developed in order to investigate their prevalence in the sample selected, with the aim of exploring their frequency, distribution and correlation. The results revealed a limited use of green criteria, which were mainly included as technical specifications and award criteria, thus shedding light on the difficulties that procurers are experiencing in the implementation of GPP practices. Several suggestions for policy makers and managers are identified for a better and faster implementation of green public procurement tools and methods.

Keywords

Environmental policy Public procurement Green criteria Content analysis Green tender 

References

  1. Adham, K. N., & Siwar, C. (2012). Empirical investigation of government green procurement (GPP) practices in Malaysia. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 05(08), 41–50.Google Scholar
  2. Bjorklund, M. (2011). Influence from the business environment on environmental purchasing: Drivers and hinders of purchasing green transportation services. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouwer, M., Jonk, M., Berman, T., Bersani, R., Lusser, H., Nappa, V., Nissinen, A., Parikka, K., Szuppinger, P., & Viganò, C. (2005). Green public procurement in Europe 2005—Status Overview”. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/report_facts.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2013.
  4. Bouwer, M., Jonk, M., Berman, T., Bersani, R., Lusser, H., Nappa, V., Nissinen, A., Parikka, K., Szuppinger, P., & Viganò, C. (2006). Green public procurement in Europe 2006—Conclusions and recommendations. Virage Milieu and Management bv, Korte Spaarne 31, 2011 AJ Haarlem, the Netherlands. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/gpp. Accessed May 14, 2013.
  5. Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: An international comparative study. Journal of Public Procurement, 6, 193–217.Google Scholar
  6. Bratt, C., Hallstedt, S., Robèrt, K. H., Broman, G., & Oldmark, J. (2013). Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, H. C., & Kristiansen, P. (2006). Selling Australia as “Clean and Green”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 50, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2007). Report of the task-force on sustainable construction: Accelerating the development of the sustainable construction market in Europe. Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2008a). Public procurement for a better environment. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0400:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed June 02, 2013.
  10. European Commission. (2008b). Green public procurement (GPP) training toolkit—Module 3: Purchasing recommendations—construction: Background product report. Brussels, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/toolkit/construction_GPP_background_report.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2013.
  11. European Commission. (2008c). Construction: Green public procurement product sheet. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/toolkit/construction_GPP_product_sheet.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2013.
  12. European Commission. (2011a). Buying Green!: A handbook on green public procurement. 2nd edn. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp. Accessed May 11, 2013.
  13. European Commission. (2011b). Single market act: Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0206:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed May 29, 2013.
  14. European Commission. (2013). Building the single market for green products. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0196:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed June 06, 2013.
  15. Faith-Ell, C. (2005). The application of environmental requirements in procurement of road maintenance in Sweden. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  16. FIEC. (2013). Annual Report 2013. Brussels. http://www.fiec.eu/en/library-619/annual-report-english.aspx. Accessed October 8, 2013.
  17. Günther, E., & Scheibe, L. (2006). The hurdle analysis. A self-evaluation tool for municipalities to identify, analyse and overcome hurdles to green procurement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(2), 61–77.Google Scholar
  18. Ho, L. W. P., Dickinson, N. M., & Chan, G. Y. S. (2010). Green procurement in the Asian public sector and the Hong Kong private sector. Natural Resource Forum, 34, 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunkeler, D., & Rebitzer, G. (2003). Life cycle costing: Paving the road to sustainable development? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 109–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iraldo, F., Testa, F., & Bartolozzi, I. (2013). An application of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a green marketing tool for agricultural products: The case of extra virgin olive oil in Val di Cornia, Italy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.735991.Google Scholar
  21. Kahlenborn, W., Moser, C., Frijdal, J., & Essig, M. (2011). Strategic use of public procurement in Europe—Final Report to the European Commission MARKT/2010/02/C. Berlin: Adelphi. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/modernising_rules/strategic-use-public-procurement-europe_en.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2014.
  22. Kassarjain, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerlinger, F. H. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research: Educational and psychology inquiry. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  24. Kippo-Edlund, P., Kippo-Edlund, P., Hauta-Heikkilä, H., Miettinen, H., & Nissinen, A. (2005). Measuring the environmental soundness of public procurement in Nordic Countries. TermaNord, 505, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. http://www.norden.org/da/publikationer/publikationer/2005-505. Accessed June 19, 2013.
  25. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Marron, D. (2003). Greener public purchasing as an environmental policy instrument. OECD Journal of Budgeting, 3, 71–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1, 2–20.Google Scholar
  28. Michelsen, O., & De Boer, L. (2009). Green Procurement in Norway: A survey of practices at the municipal and county level. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nissinen, A., Parikka-Alhola, K., & Rita, H. (2009). Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005. Ecological Economics, 68, 1838–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oruezabala, G., & Rico, J. C. (2012). The impact of sustainable public procurement on supplier management: The case of French public hospitals. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 573–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmujoki, A., Parikka Alhola, K., & Ekroos, A. (2010). Green public procurement: Analysis on the use of environmental criteria in contracts. RECIEL, 19, 250–262.Google Scholar
  32. Preuss, L. (2007). Buying into our future: The range of sustainability initiatives in local government procurement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. PwC (Pricewaterhouse&coopers), Significant and Ecofys. (2009). Collection of statistical information on Green Public Procurement in the EU: Report on data collection results, January 2009. Source http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/statistical_information.pdf.
  34. Renda, A., Pelkmans, J., Egenhofer, C., Schrefler, L., Luchetta, G., & Selçuki, C. (2012). The uptake of green public procurement on the EU27. CEPS, Submitted to the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/CEPS-CoE-GPP%20MAIN%20REPORT.pdf. Accessed May 07, 2013.
  35. Snider, K. F., Halpern, B. H., Rendon, R. G., & Kidalov, M. V. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and public procurement: How supplying government affects managerial orientations. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swanson, M., Weissman, A., Davis, G., Socolof, M., & Davis, K. (2005). Developing priorities for greener state government purchasing: A California case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tarantini, M., Loprieno, A. D., & Porta, P. L. (2011). A life cycle approach to green public procurement of building materials and elements: A case study on windows. Energy, 36, 2473–2482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2011a). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: The case of the building and construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2136–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2011b). Environmental regulation, practices and competitive performance: New evidence from a sectoral study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18, 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., & Daddi, T. (2012). What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecological Economics, 82, 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Varnas, A., Balfors, B., & Faith-Ell, C. (2009). Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: Current practices, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5, 1214–1222.Google Scholar
  42. Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012). The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willis, K. G. (2010). Is all sustainable development sustainable? A cost-benefit analysis of some procurement projects. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 12, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2013). Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 126, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Testa
    • 1
  • Paolo Grappio
    • 1
  • Natalia M. Gusmerotti
    • 1
  • Fabio Iraldo
    • 1
  • Marco Frey
    • 1
  1. 1.Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies – Institute of ManagementPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations