Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 837–858 | Cite as

Non-timber forest products certification and management: a socioeconomic study among the Kadars in Kerala, India

  • Jyotsna Krishnakumar
  • John F. Yanagida
  • V. Anitha
  • Rajeev Balakrishnan
  • Theodore J. K. Radovich
Article

Abstract

Debates on linking livelihoods and conservation through the commercialization of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) continue to hold significance considering the increasing market demand for NTFPs, its high economic value for forest-dependent communities and “enabling” neoliberal policies that are in place. Kerala, located on the southwest coast of India, flanked by the Western Ghats—a UN declared biodiversity hot spot, on its windward side, is of particular significance due to the presence of the Ayurvedic industry—a traditional medicine industry that procures 90 % of its raw materials from the wild. In addition, the presence of a resource-dependent tribal population re-affirms the economic, social and cultural significance of NTFPs. Unsustainable practices and poor co-management and marketing arrangements have rendered the sector ineffective in terms of meeting livelihood as well as conservation goals in the region. Although new approaches such as NTFP certification are being recommended for India not much has been reported on its feasibility and/or implementation challenges. Focusing on the Kadar community of Kerala, this study attempts to highlight some of the issues within the sector and using an “instrumental model”, present the benefits accrued from new strategies such as NTFP certification through quantitative and qualitative assessments. Last but not least, recommendations for the adoption of sustainable strategies in context with the existing policy environment are provided that may be broadly applicable to other forest-dependent communities in India and elsewhere.

Keywords

NTFP Western Ghats NTFP certification Livelihoods Conservation Cost benefit 

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 243–262.Google Scholar
  2. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Alcorn, P. W. (2002). Section II: NTFP species profile from around the world—Chicle (Manilkara zapota). In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 49–60). London: Earthscan London.Google Scholar
  4. Amacher, G. S., Hyde, W. F., & Kanel, K. R. (1999). Nepali fuelwood production and consumption: Regional and household distinctions, substitution and successful intervention. The Journal of Development Studies, 35, 138–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anitha, V., & Rajeev, B. (2012). The scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006: Implementation constraints among particularly vulnerable tribal groups in Kerala. In International conference on social protection, Kuttikanam, Idukki, Kerala, December 12–15.Google Scholar
  6. Anitha, V., Rajeev, B., & Krishnakumar, J. (2013). Property rights and tribal empowermentAn assessment of FRA 2006 implementation among Kadars in Kerala, India. International Congress for Environmental Research, Aurangabad, December 19–21.Google Scholar
  7. ASSOCHAM. (2010). Indian herbal industry to double by 2015: Study associated chamber of commerce and industry of India. http://www.smetimes.in/smetimes/news/top-stories/2010/Mar/06/indian-herbal-industry-to-double-by-2015-study14569.html. (Accessed May 15, 2013).
  8. Balée, W., & Gely, A. (1989). Managed forest succession in Amazonia: The Ka’apor case. Advances in Economic Botany, 7, 129–158.Google Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya, P., Prasad, R., Bhattacharyya, R., & Asokan, A. (2008). Towards certification of wild medicinal and aromatic plants in four Indian states. Unasylva, 230, 35–44.Google Scholar
  10. Bhattacharya, P., Prasad, R., & Roy, S. (2009). Developing national standards for NTFP certification in India: A tool to achieve sustainable NTFP management and equitable benefit sharing. World Forestry Congress.Google Scholar
  11. Bluffstone, R., Boscolo, M., Molina, R., & Dialogo, F. (2001). How does community forestry affect rural households? A labor allocation model of the Bolivian Andes. Working paper, University of Redlands, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Burnside, A.-M. (2013). Partnerships create opportunities for community forest users in Nepal, FSC smallholder spotlight, FSC newsletter, smallholder update, Q 1. Bonn, Germany: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) International.Google Scholar
  13. Cashore, B., van Kooten, G. C., Vertinsky, I., Auld, G., & Affolderbach, J. (2005). Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavendish, W. (2000). Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 28, 1979–2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CGCERT Website. Annual fee structure for organic certification, CGCERT operating manual, Chhattisgarh, India. http://www.cgcert.com/. (Accessed February 2013).
  16. Chaudhuri, S. K., Chaudhuri, S. S. (2005). Primitive tribes in contemporary India: Concept, ethnography and demography. New Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar
  17. Chopra, K. (1997). The valuation and pricing of non-timber forest products: Conceptual issues and a case study from India. In F. Smith (Ed.), Environmental sustainability: Practical global implications (pp. 107–140). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cooke, P. A. (1998). Intrahousehold labor allocation responses to environmental good scarcity: A case study from the hills of Nepal. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46, 807–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coomes, O. T. (1995). A century of rain forest use in western Amazonia: Lessons for extraction-based conservation of tropical forest resources. Forest & Conservation History, 39, 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FSC Fact Sheet. (2012). Costs and benefits of certification. Forest Stewardship Council, FSC-US. http://us.fsc.org/download.costs-and-benefits-of-forest-certification.198.htm. (Accessed April 20, 2013).
  21. FSC Technical Report. (2009). FSC user-friendly guide to FSC certification for smallholders. Forest Stewardship Council, International Center GmbH. www.fsc-uk.org/download.fsc-smallholder-guide.a-181.pdf. (Accessed April 20, 2013).
  22. FSC Technical Report. (2013). FSC international standards. Bonn, Germany: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) International. https://ic.fsc.org/principles-and-criteria.34.htm. (Accessed April 20, 2013).
  23. Gadgil, M., & Rao, P. S. (1998). Nurturing biodiversity: An Indian agenda. New Delhi: Centre for Environment Education.Google Scholar
  24. Godoy, R. A., & Bawa, K. S. (1993). The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical forest: Assumptions, hypotheses, and methods. Economic Botany, 47, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godoy, R., Wilkie, D., Overman, H., Cubas, A., Cubas, G., Demmer, J., et al. (2000). Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest. Nature, 406, 62–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., & Wunder, S. (2005). How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development, 33, 1511–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gubbi, S., & MacMillan, D. C. (2008). Can non-timber forest products solve livelihood problems? A case study from Periyar Tiger Reserve, India. Oryx, 42, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guillen, A., Pierce, A. R., & Donovan, R. Z. (2002). Section III: The core elements of NTFP certification—Technical issues. In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 337–353). London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Gunatilake, H. (1998). The role of rural development in protecting tropical rainforests: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Management, 53, 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gunatilake, H., Senaratne, D., & Abeygunawardena, P. (1993). Role of non-timber forest products in the economy of peripheral communities of Knuckles National Wilderness Area of Sri Lanka: A farming systems approach. Economic Botany, 47, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hussain, S. (1999). Tenure in the context of sustainable use of natural resources in Asia. In J.A.E. Oglethorpe (Ed.), Tenure and Sustainable Use, (pp. 21–28). Gland, Switzerland and Cambride, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
  32. Illukpitiya, P. (2005). Technical efficiency in agriculture and dependency on forest resources: An economic analysis of rural households and the conservation of natural forests in Sri Lanka. EEPSEA. http://www.eepsea.org. (Accessed May 15, 2013).
  33. Illukpitiya, P., & Yanagida, J. F. (2010). Farming vs forests: Trade-off between agriculture and the extraction of non-timber forest products. Ecological Economics, 69, 1952–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. INDOCERT Website. INDOCERT, Kerala, India.http://www.indocert.org/new/index.php/en/. (Accessed April 22, 2013).
  35. Jayaraman, K., & Anitha, V. (2010). Forestry sector analysis for the state of KeralaPhase II. KFRI Research Report, Kerala.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, D. (2002). Section II: NTFP species profile from around the world—Palm heart (Euterpe spp.). In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 75–85). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  37. Kakkoth, S. (2005). The primitive tribal groups of kerala: A situational appraisal. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 3, 47–55.Google Scholar
  38. Kapoor, P., & Garyali, S. (2012). Organic food market in India. Case in point: Organic fruits & dairy products. New Delhi: Technopak Advisors Pvt. LtdGoogle Scholar
  39. KFD Website, Kerala Forest Department. http://www.forest.kerala.gov.in/. (Accessed January 18, 2013).
  40. Köhlin, G. (1998). The value of social forestry in Orissa, India. Doctoral thesis, University of Gothenburg, Economics. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/12386.
  41. Krishnakumar, J., Anitha, V., Yanagida, J., Rajeev, B., & Radovich, T. (2012a). Certification of non-timber forest products-primary stakeholder reactions and forest rights policy implications—Study on Kadar community. In International conference on social protection: Perspective and policies, Kuttikanam, Kerala, India, December 12–15.Google Scholar
  42. Krishnakumar, J., Fox, J., & Anitha, V. (2012b). Non-timber forest products. Economic & Political Weekly, 47, 133.Google Scholar
  43. Laird, S. A., McLain, R. J., & Wynberg, R. P. (Eds.). (2010). Wild product governance: Finding policies that work for non-timber forest products. London: Earthscan/James & James.Google Scholar
  44. Lélé, S., Patanaik, M., & Rai, N. D. (2010). NTFPs in India: Rhetoric and reality. In S. Laird, R. J. McLain, & R. P. Wynberg (Eds.), Wild product governance: Finding policies that work for non-timber forest products (pp. 94–96). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  45. Li, T. M. (2002). Engaging simplifications: Community-based resource management, market processes and state agendas in upland Southeast Asia. World Development, 30, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lilieholm, R. J., & Weatherly, W. P. (2010). Kibale forest wild coffee: Challenges to market-based conservation in Africa. Conservation Biology, 24, 924–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Madhavan, H. (2008). Linking tribal medicinal plant co-operatives and ayurvedic manufacturing firms for better rural livelihood and sustainable use of resources. MPRA paper no. 6954. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6954/. (Accessed January 10, 2011).
  48. Mahapatra, A. K., Albers, H. J., & Robinson, E. J. (2005). The impact of NTFP sales on rural households’ cash income in India’s dry deciduous forest. Environmental Management, 35, 258–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Menon, P. (2003). Conservation and consumption—A study on the crude drug trade in threatened medicinal plants in Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala. Trivandrum: KRPLLD, CDS.Google Scholar
  50. Menon, M. K. (2007). The market potential for organic foods in India. In Paper submitted in international conference on organic agriculture and food security (pp. 65–67), FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  51. Menon, M. K. (2008). Organic agriculture and market potential for organic products in India. In Proceedings of the international workshop on opportunities and challenges of organic production and marketing in South Asia (pp. 87–94), Khatmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
  52. MNREG Website, MNREG. http://nrega.nic.in/nerega_statewise.pdf. (Accessed January 15, 2013).
  53. Münster, U., & Vishnudas, S. (2012). In the jungle of law. Economic & Political Weekly, 47, 39.Google Scholar
  54. Nath, S. (2010). Eco certification for NTFPs & plant extractions from forests in India. In M. Ramnath (Ed.), Indigenous people and forests in India—View from a network (pp. 42–57). Tamil Nadu: Keystone Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Navdeep, S., Koyal, S., & Singh, G. K. (2011). Establishment of an herbal industry in India. International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biological Archives, 2(4), 1011–1019.Google Scholar
  56. Nepstad, D. C., & Schwartzman, S. (Eds.). (1992). Introduction: Non-timber product extraction from tropical forests evaluation of a conservation and development strategy. In Advances in Economic Botany, (p. 9). New York: The New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  57. Ninan, K. N. (2009). Non-timber forest products and biodiversity conservation—A study of tribals in a protected area in India. In K. N. Ninan (Ed.), Conserving and valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity: Economic, institutional and social challenges (pp. 99–112). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  58. Ortiz, E. G. (2002). Section II: NTFP species profile from around the world—Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa). In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 61–75). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  59. Ostrom, E. (2005). Self-governance and forest resources. In P. Shah & V. Maitra (Eds.), Terracotta reader: A market approach to the environment (pp. 131–154). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  60. Pattanayak, S. K., & Sills, E. O. (2001). Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Economics, 77, 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perez, M. R., & Byron, N. (1999). A methodology to analyze divergent case studies of non-timber forest products and their development potential. Forest Science, 45, 1–14.Google Scholar
  62. Pierce, A. (2002). Social issues: Section III: The core elements of NTFP certification. In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 283–299). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  63. Pierce, A., & Ervin, J. (1999). Can independent forest management certification incorporate elements of landscape ecology? Unasylva, 50(196).Google Scholar
  64. Planning Commission Report. (2011). Report of the subgroupsII on NTFP and their sustainable management in the 12th 5-year plan. Planning Commissions’ working group on forests and natural resource management, September 11, New Series.Google Scholar
  65. Rai, N. (2007). The ecology of income: Can we have both fruit and forest. In G. S. Rangarajan (Ed.), Making conservation work (pp. 142–162). Uttaranchal: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
  66. Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Epstein, G. (2012). Towards an analytical framework for forest law compliance. International Forestry Review, 14, 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. RANCOS Industry Research Solutions. (2012). Indian cosmetic industry going green. http://www.rncos.com/Press_Releases/Indian-Cosmetic-Industry-Going-Green.htm. (Accessed May 15, 2013).
  68. ReutersReport. (2013). IndiaPrime lending rates of banks. http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/06/24/india-plr-idINL3N0F01W420130624. (Accessed January 20, 2013).
  69. Sample Size Calculator. http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. (Accessed March 10, 2012).
  70. Samraj, T. (2010). The ayurvedic industry and its implications on NTFP sustainability. In M. Ramnath (Ed.), Indigenous people and forests in India—View from a network. Keystone Foundation: Tamil Nadu.Google Scholar
  71. Satyapalan, J. (2010). Implementation of the forest rights act in the Western Ghats region of Kerala. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(30), 8.Google Scholar
  72. Saxena, N. C. (1997). Policy and legal reforms for the poor in India. New Delhi: UNDP.Google Scholar
  73. Shahabuddin, G., & Prasad, S. (2004). Assessing ecological sustainability of non-timber forest produce extraction: The Indian scenario. Conservation and Society, 2, 235–250.Google Scholar
  74. Shankar, U., Murali, K., Shaanker, R. U., Ganeshaiah, K., & Bawa, K. (1998). Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 4. Impact on floristic diversity and population structure in a thorn scrub forest. Economic Botany, 52, 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shanley, P., Laird, S. A., Pierce, A. R., & Guillen, A. (2002a). Section IV: Conclusions and recommendations. In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 353–366). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  76. Shanley, P., Pierce, A., Laird, S., & Guillen, A. (2002b). Section I: Overview. In P. Shanley, A. Pierce, S. Laird, & A. Guillen (Eds.), Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products (pp. 3–28). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  77. Shanley, P., Pierce, A., Laird, S., & Robinson, D. (2008) Beyond timber: Certification and management of non-timber forest products. Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
  78. Shrivastava, K. S. (2012). The new votaries of forest rights act, down to earth. New Delhi, India: Society for Environmental Communications.Google Scholar
  79. Shylajan, C., & Mythili, G. (2012). Community dependence on non-timber forest products: A household analysis and its implication for forest conservation. Mumbai: IGIDR.Google Scholar
  80. Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Sjaastad, E., & Berg, G. (2004). Counting on the Environment: Forest Incomes and the Rural Poor. Working paper, Environment Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  81. Viana, V., Pierce, A. R., & Donovan, R. (1996). Certification of non-timber forest products. In V. Viana, J. Erwin, R. Donovan, C. Elliot, & H. Golz (Eds.), Certification of forest products: Issues and perspectives (pp. 145–163). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  82. Wilsey, D. S., & Hildebrand, P. E. (2011). Chamaedorea palm frond commercialization and certification considered from a smallholder livelihood system perspective. Small-Scale Forestry, 10, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yadav, M., & Dugaya, D. (2013). Non-timber forest products certification in India: Opportunities and challenges. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yadav, M., & Misra, S. (2012). Sustainable development: A role for market information systems for non-timber forest products. Sustainable Development, 20, 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jyotsna Krishnakumar
    • 1
  • John F. Yanagida
    • 2
  • V. Anitha
    • 3
  • Rajeev Balakrishnan
    • 3
  • Theodore J. K. Radovich
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ManagementUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ManagementUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.Forestry and Human Dimensions Program Division, Forest Economics DepartmentKerala Forest Research InstituteThrissur DistrictIndia
  4. 4.Department of Tropical Plant and Soil ScienceUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations