Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 811–820 | Cite as

Pathways of rural change: an integrated assessment of metabolic patterns in emerging ruralities

  • F. RaveraEmail author
  • A. Scheidel
  • J. dell’Angelo
  • G. Gamboa
  • T. Serrano
  • S. Mingorría
  • V. Cabello
  • N. Arizpe
  • P. Ariza
Article

Abstract

While rural transformations are nothing new in human history, current processes of rural change occur under multiple forces at an unprecedented pace, involving profound and unexpected changes in land use and users, and rapid transformations in the metabolic patterns of rural systems. The present special section aims to shed light on current drivers and pathways of rural change by analyzing, under a common conceptual and theoretical framework, examples of new ruralities that are emerging as responses across different world regions. Within this context, this introduction presents: (1) common research questions of the six presented cases of rural change; (2) the general theoretical and methodological framework of integrated assessment of societal metabolism adopted to analyze rural systems and (3) the main contributions and conclusions that could be drawn from six context-specific case studies from Asia, Latin America and Europe.

Keywords

Bio-economy Complexity Integrated assessment Rural systems Societal metabolism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Mario Giampietro and Jesús Ramos-Martín for their valuable comments. This article and the work of this special section are the result of a project initiated long ago, inspired by the lectures and discussions carried out within the rural system assessment group (http://www.ruralsystems.org/), and received thoughtful feedbacks from other members. We would especially mention Talía Waldron, Giuseppina Siciliano, Jaime Paneque and Oswaldo Viteri Salazar. We would also thank all the co-authors of the special section. The first author of this article gratefully appreciates the economic funding from Alianza 4U to contribute to the writing of this manuscript.

References

  1. Altieri, M., Funes-Monzote, F., & Petersen, P. (2011). Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arizpe, N., Giampietro, M., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2011). Food security and fossil energy dependence: An international comparison of the use of fossil energy in agriculture (1991–2003). Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benayas, J. R., Martins, A., Nicolau, J. M., & Schulz, J. J. (2007). Abandonment of agricultural land: An overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Reviews Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
  4. Borras, S. M, Jr. (2009). Agrarian change and peasant studies: Changes, continuities and challenges—an introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borras, S. M, Jr, McMichael, P., & Scoones, I. (2010). The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: Editors’ introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37, 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottrel, W. F. (1955). Energy and society: The relation between energy, social changes and economic development (p. 330). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. FAO (2013). FAO statistical databases. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed October 2013.
  8. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41, 347–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giampietro, M. (2003). Multi-scale integrated analysis of agro-ecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giampietro, M., Aspinall, R. J., Ramos-Martín, J. & Bukkens, S. G. F. (Eds). Resource accounting for sustainability: The nexus between energy, food, water and land use. Routledge series ‘Explorations in Sustainability and Governance’. http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415720595/ (To be published 30th March 2014).
  12. Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2000). Multiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: Introducing the approach. Population and Environment, 22, 109–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2009). The biofuel delusion. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2009). Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): Theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy, 34, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Sorman, A. H. (2011). The metabolic pattern of societies: Where economists fall short. Vol. 15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Goodman, D. (2004). Rural Europe redux? Reflections on alternative agro-food networks and paradigm change. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(1), 1–23 Google Scholar
  17. Gomiero, T., & Giampietro, M. (2001). Multiple-scale integrated analysis of farming systems: The Thuong Lo Commune (Vietnamese Uplands) Case Study. Population and Environment A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 22(3), 315–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunbuhel, C. M., & Schandl, H. (2005). Using land-time-budgets to analyse farming systems and poverty alleviation policies in the Lao PDR. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 5(3), 142–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hart, K. & Baldock, D. (2011). Greening the CAP: Delivering environmental outcomes through pillar one. Institute for European Environmental Policy. http://www.ieep.org.uk/assets/831/Greening_Pillar_1_IEEP_Thinkpiece_-_Final.pdf. Accessed February 2014.
  20. Harvey, D. R. (2004). Policy dependency and reform: Economic gains versus political pains. Agricultural Economics, 31(2–3), 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hecht, S. (2010). The new rurality: Globalization, peasants and the paradoxes of landscapes. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holt-Giménez, E., & Shattuck, A. (2009). The agrofuels transition restructuring places and spaces in the global food system. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(3), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kay, C. (2008). Reflections on Latin American rural studies in the neoliberal globalization period: A new rurality? Development and Change, 39(6), 915–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly, P. F. (2011). Migration, agrarian transition, and rural change in Southeast Asia. Critical Asian Studies, 43(4), 479–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lotka, A. J. (1956). Elements of mathematical biology. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pastore, G., Giampietro, M., & Ji, L. (1999). Conventional and land-time budget analysis of rural villages in Hubei Province China. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18(3), 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pengue, W. A. (2009). Agrofuels and agrifoods counting the externalities at the major crossroads of the 21st century. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(3), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramos-Martin, J., Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2007). On China’s exosomatic energy metabolism: An application of multi-scale integrated analysis of societal metabolism (MSIASM). Ecological Economics, 63, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Renting, H., Rossing, W. A. H., Groot, J. C. J., Van der Ploeg, J. D., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., et al. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosset, P. M., & Martínez-Torres, M. E. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 17. doi: 10.5751/ES-05000-170317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scheidel, A., Giampietro, M., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2013). Self-sufficiency or surplus: Conflicting local and national rural development goals in Cambodia. Land Use Policy, 34, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Serrano-Tovar, T., & Giampietro, M. (2014). Multi-scale integrated analysis of rural Laos: Studying metabolic patterns of land uses across different levels and scales. Land Use Policy, 36, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siciliano, G. (2012). Urbanization strategies, rural development and land use changes in China: A multiple-level integrated assessment. Land Use Policy, 29(1), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sorman, A., & Giampietro, M. (2011). Generating better energy indicators: Addressing the existence of multiple scales and multiple dimensions. Ecological Modelling, 223, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. United Nations (2012). World urbanization prospects—the 2011 revision. United Nations Organization, New York. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/index.htm. Accessed January 10, 2014.
  37. van der Ploeg, J. D., & Renting, H. (2004). Behind the ‘redux’: A rejoinder to David Goodman. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(2), 234–242.Google Scholar
  38. White, L. A. (1949). The science of culture: A study of man and civilization. New York: Farrar, Straus and Company.Google Scholar
  39. Zipf, G. F. (1941). National unity and disunity. The nation as a bio-social organism. Bloomington, Indiana: Principia Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Ravera
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Scheidel
    • 2
  • J. dell’Angelo
    • 2
    • 3
  • G. Gamboa
    • 4
  • T. Serrano
    • 2
  • S. Mingorría
    • 2
  • V. Cabello
    • 5
  • N. Arizpe
    • 6
  • P. Ariza
    • 7
  1. 1.Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of EcologyUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Building, Energy and Environment Group, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE)Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.The Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy AnalysisIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA)Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB)Cerdanyola del VallèsSpain
  5. 5.Department of Human GeographyUniversity of SevilleSevilleSpain
  6. 6.Programa de Postgrado de Antropología Social (PPAS)Universidad Nacional de MisionesPosadasArgentina
  7. 7.Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO)QuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations