Integrated hydrologic–economic decision support system for groundwater use confronting climate change uncertainties in the Tunuyán River basin, Argentina
- 327 Downloads
This study presents an integrated hydrologic–economic model as decision support system for groundwater use and incorporates uncertainties of climate change. The model was developed with the Vensim software (Ventana Systems) for system dynamic simulations. The software permitted the integration of economic variables along with hydrologic variables, in a unified format with the aim of evaluating the economic impacts of climate change on arid environments. To test the model, we applied it in one of the upper Tunuyán River sub-basin, located in the Mendoza Province (Argentina), where irrigation comes from groundwater. The model defines the best mix of crops and the total land use required to maximize the total river sub-basin monetary income, considering as a limit the amount of water that does not exceed the natural annual aquifer recharge. To estimate the impacts of climatic changes, four scenarios were compared: the business as usual (with the number of existing wells) in a dry year with a temperature increase of 4 °C; the business as usual in a wet year with an increase in temperature of 1.1 °C; an efficient use of wells in a dry year and a temperature increase of 4 °C and an efficient use of wells in a wet year with a temperature increase of 1.1 °C. Outputs calculated by the model were: land use per crop, total sub-basin net benefit, total sub-basin water extraction, water extraction limit depending on river discharge and total number of wells required to irrigate the entire area. Preliminary results showed that the number of existing wells exceeded the optimized number of wells required to sustainably irrigate the entire river sub-basin. Results indicated that in an average river discharge year, if wells were efficiently used, further rural development would be possible, until the limit of 350 million m3 of water extraction per year was reached (650 million m3 for a wet year and 180 million m3 for a dry year). The unified format and the low cost of the software license make the model a useful tool for Water Resources Management Institutions, particularly in developing countries.
KeywordsSustainable water management Mathematical simulation model Aquifer recharge Groundwater irrigation
We would like to express our gratitude to Prof. Pablo Canziani (Universidad Católica de Buenos Aires), Prof. Pablo Romanazzi (Universidad de La Plata), and Prof. Alejandro Gennari (Universidad de Cuyo), for the technical help and for all the data provided during this research.
- Ahrends, H., Mast, M., Rodgers, C., & Kunstmann, H. (2008). Coupled hydrological–economic modelling for optimised irrigated cultivation in a semi-arid catchment of West Africa. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(4), 385–395. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.08.002.
- Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements FAO Irrigation and Drainage 56 Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- Bates, B., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Wu, S., & Palutikof, J. P. (2008). Climate change and water. Technical paper VI vol Technical paper VI Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat, Geneva.Google Scholar
- Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., & Lasdon, L. S. (2003). Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129: 4/17.Google Scholar
- Cavana, R.Y., & Ford, A. (2004). Environmental and resources systems, editor's introduction. System Dynamics Review 20(2), 89–98. Google Scholar
- Diaz, G. E., & Brown, T. C. (1997). Aquarius: an object-oriented model for efficient allocation of water in river basins. Paper presented at the Symposium Water Resources Education, training and Practice, opportunities for the Next Century, Keystone.Google Scholar
- Grossmann, M., & Dietrich, O. (2012). Integrated economic-hydrologic assessment of water management options for regulated wetlands under conditions of climate change: A case study from the Spreewald (Germany). Water Resources Management, 26(7), 2081–2108. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0005-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernández, J. (1998). Aspectos hidrológicos del Valle de Uco. Provincia de Mendoza. Vol. DI 261. San Juan. Google Scholar
- Hernández, J., & Martinis, N. (2001). Modernización del manejo de los recursos hídricos—Agua Subterránea. INA, Mendoza: Cuenca de los ríos Diamante y Atuel. Mendoza.Google Scholar
- Mainuddin, M., Kirby, M., & Qureshi, M. E. (2007). Integrated hydrologic-economic modelling for analyzing water acquisition strategies in the Murray River Basin. Agricultural Water Management, 93(3), 123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.06.011.
- Mc Kinney, D. C., Cai, X., Rosergrant, M. W., Ringler, C., & Scott, C. A. (1999). Modelling water resources management at the basin level: Review and future directions. System-wide initiative on water management papers, Vol. 6. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
- Morabito, J. A., Bustos, R. M., & Salatino, S. E. (2005). Participación de los regantes en la administración del agua en la tercera zona de riego del río Mendoza (Argentina). Análisis según nivel educativo y tamaño de la propiedad. Papers INA Mendoza, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
- Morabito, J. A., Hernandez, R., Salatino, S. E., & Mirabile, C. M. (2009). Calculo de las necesidades de riego de los principales cultivos del oasi Sur. Mendoza, Argentina. Papers INA, Mendoza, Argentina.Google Scholar
- Querner, E. P., Morabito, J. A., & Tozzi, D. (2008). SIMGRO, a GIS-supported regional hydrological model in irrigated areas: Case study in Mendoza, Argentina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 44.Google Scholar
- Rodgers, C., & Zaafrano, R. (2003). A water resources management policy simulation model of the Brantas Basin, East Java, Indonesia. Paper presented at the Paper prepared for the Panel on Water Policy and Agricultural Production at the Global and River Basin levels, Durban, South Africa., August 16–23.Google Scholar
- Rosegrant, M. W., Ringler, C., McKinney, D. C., Cai, X., Keller, A., & Donoso, G. (2000). Integrated economic-hydrologic water modelling at the basin scale: Maipo river basin. Agricultural Economics, 24, 33–46.Google Scholar
- Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Taylor, R. G., Scanlon, B., Doll, P., Rodell, M., van Beek, R., Wada, Y. et al. (2012). Ground water and climate change. Nature Climate Change. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- Vensim. (2010). User’s guide-Vensim introduction and tutorials-Ventana System.Google Scholar
- Ventana Systems I. (1998).Vensim PLE software version 3.0. Ventana Systems, Inc., 60. Jacob Gates Road, Harvard, Massachusetts.Google Scholar