Identifying and rating cultural sustainability indicators: a case study of wood-based bioenergy systems in eastern Finland
- 569 Downloads
Cultural sustainability has become a much discussed topic in the forestry and bioenergy sectors. However, there are not many indicators available for measuring cultural sustainability. In order to identify indicators for the assessment of the cultural sustainability impacts of wood-based bioenergy in eastern Finland, two-phased expert interviews were conducted. The process was supported by a hybrid approach: A qualitative mapping technique was applied when the indicators were identified, and weights for the indicators were set using a quantitative rating technique. The experts identified 49 indicators of cultural sustainability. Most of the generated indicators were relevant for local uses and highlighted the perceptions of the general public. Furthermore, most of the indicators were relevant from the perspective of raw material acquisition. Applying methods of differing backgrounds enabled advanced problem structuring, which allowed the identification of indicators suitable for assessing cultural sustainability of wood-based bioenergy in Eastern Finland. The quantitative rating technique enabled the determination of the importance of the indicators generated. Nevertheless, it seems that the hybrid approaches have many challenges related to the quantitative measuring of the participants’ perceptions. Cultural sustainability indicators should be identified within a case study, since it seems that most of the cultural sustainability indicators are case specific. The process introduced here offers steps for identifying case-specific cultural sustainability indicators; however, the concept of cultural sustainability cannot be strictly defined.
KeywordsCultural sustainability Indicators Sustainability assessment Wood-based bioenergy
The research questions and data collection procedure were designed as part of the BioSus project, funded by Tekes, the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation. The process of identifying cultural sustainability indicators was funded by the Academy of Finland (decision number 127681). We would like to thank the anonymous experts who identified all cultural sustainability indicators listed in this paper.
- Axelrod, R. M. (1976). Structure of decisions: The cognitive map of political elites. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Duxbury, N., & Gillette, E. (2007). Culture as a key dimension of sustainability: Exploring concepts, themes, and models. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
- Edwards, W. (1971). Social utilities. Engineering Economist, Summer Symposium Series, 6(1), 119–129.Google Scholar
- Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
- International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) (2005). Revised ITTO criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of tropical forests including reporting format (ITTO policy development series, 15). http://www.itto.int/policypapers_guidelines/.
- Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norto.Google Scholar
- Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2003). Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 5(3/4), 279–288.Google Scholar
- Lähtinen, K., Pitkänen, S., Leskinen, P., & Myllyviita, T. (2013). A review of indicators suitable for assessing the sustainability of forest-based bioenergy production in a local perspective. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews (Submitted).Google Scholar
- Leskinen, P., Kähkönen, T., Lähtinen, K., Pasanen, K., Pitkänen, S., & Sironen, S. et al. (2012). Moniulotteinen kestävyyden arviointikehikko puuenergian tuotannolle—multi-dimensional sustainability framework to evaluate forest and wood energy production. Finnish environment 9/2012.Google Scholar
- Mrosek, T., Balsillie, D., & Schleifenbaum, P. (2006). Field testing of a criteria and indicators system for sustainable forest management at the local level. Case study results concerning the sustainability of the private forest Haliburton Forest and Wild Life Reserve in Ontario, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(6), 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myllyviita, T., Leskinen, P., Lähtinen, K., Pasanen, K., Sironen, S., Kähkönen, T., & Sikanen, L. (2013). Sustainability assessment of wood-based bioenergy—a case study of Eastern Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy (Submitted).Google Scholar
- Nurse, K. (2006). Culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development. Small States: Economic Review and Basic Statistics, 11, 28–40.Google Scholar
- Parviainen, J., & Västilä, S. (2011). State of Finland’s forests 2011—based on the criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. Publication of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 5a, 95.Google Scholar
- Rantala, M., Hujala, T., & Kurttila, M. (2012). Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustainability in the action of forest biodiversity cooperation networks. Silva Fennica, 46(3), 441–459.Google Scholar
- Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D. G., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59(4), 406–418.Google Scholar
- Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (Eds.). (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la method ELECTRE). Revue Française d′Informatique et de RechercheOpérationnelle, 8(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
- Stirling, J. (2006). Analysis, participation and power: Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 95–107.Google Scholar
- Sustainable Development Research Institute. (1998). Social capital formation and institutions for sustainability. Workshop proceedings prepared by Asoka Mendis. Vancouver: Sustainable Development Research Institute. www.williambowles.info/mimo/refs/soc_cap.html.
- UNESCO. (2001). UNESCO Universal Declaration of Cultural Diversity (UNCED). http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13179&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
- Von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar