Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 123–139 | Cite as

Adaptation in a multi-stressor environment: perceptions and responses to climatic and economic risks by coffee growers in Mesoamerica

  • Hallie Eakin
  • Catherine M. Tucker
  • Edwin Castellanos
  • Rafael Diaz-Porras
  • Juan F. Barrera
  • Helda Morales
Article

Abstract

While climate change adaptation policy has tended to focus on planned adaptation interventions, in many vulnerable communities, adaptation will consist of autonomous, “unplanned” actions by individuals who are responding to multiple simultaneous sources of change. Their actions are likely not only to affect their own future vulnerability, but, through changes in livelihoods and resource use, the vulnerability of their community and resource base. In this paper, we document the autonomous changes to livelihood strategies adopted by smallholder coffee farmers in four Mesoamerican countries (Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and Costa Rica). Our aim is to gain insight into the process of autonomous adaptation by proxy: through an assessment of how farmers explain their choices in relation to distinct stressors; and an understanding of the set of choices available to farmers. We find that climatic stress is a feature in decision making, but not the dominant driver. Nevertheless, the farmers in our sample are evidently flexible, adaptive, and experimental in relation to changing circumstances. Whether their autonomous responses to diverse stressors will result in a reduction in risk over time may well depend on the extent to which policy, agricultural research, and rural investments build on the inherent logic of these strategies.

Keywords

Climate change Market volatility Coffee production Livelihood strategies Mesoamerica Autonomous adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the many coffee farmers who have participated in this research, and representatives of NGOs and government programs who offered their knowledge, time, and access to archival documents. We thank Sharon Amani and Ana Lucía Solano Garrido for their assistance with the data analysis. The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) (CRN-2060) generously provided funding through U.S. NSF Grant GEO-0452325.

References

  1. Bacon, C. (2010). Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access and price. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37, 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer, J., Muschler, R., Kass, D., & Somarriba, E. (1998). Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforestry Systems, 38, 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-being and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 14.11–14.22.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, I., Huq, S., Limc, B., Pilifosovad, O., & Schipper, E. L. (2002). From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: The shaping of adaptation policy. Climate Policy, 2(3), 145–159.Google Scholar
  5. Clarence-Smith, W. G., & Topik, S. (Eds.). (2003). The global coffee economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500–1989. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cruz-Bello, G. M., Eakin, H., Morales, H., & Barrera, J. F. (2011). Linking multi-temporal analysis and community consultation to evaluate the response to the impact of Hurricane Stan in coffee areas of Chiapas, Mexico. Natural Hazards, 58, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daviron, B., & Ponte, S. (2005). The coffee paradox: Global markets, commodity trade and the elusive promise of development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2001). Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: The role of off-farm activities. World Development, 29(3), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Descroix, F., & Snoeck, J. (2009). Environmental factors suitable for coffee production. In J. N. Wintgens (Ed.), Coffee: Growing, processing, sustainable production, 2nd rev edn (pp. 168–181). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
  10. Eakin, H. (2005). Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from central Mexico. World Development, 33(11), 1923–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eakin, H., Benessaiah, K., Barrera, J., Cruz-Bello, G., & Morales, H. (2012). Livelihoods and landscapes at the threshold of change: Disaster and resilience in a Chiapas coffee community. Regional Environmental Change, 12(3), 475–488. doi: 10.1007/s10113-011-0263-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eakin, H., Tucker, C., & Castellanos, E. (2006). Responding to the coffee crisis: A pilot study of farmers' adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. The Geographical Journal, 172(2), 156–171.Google Scholar
  13. Eakin, H., & Wehbe, M. (2009). Linking local vulnerability to system sustainability in a resilience framework: Two cases from Latin America. Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). (2012). FAOSTAT. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html#HOME.
  16. Fosu-Mensah, B. Y., Vlek, P. L. G., & MacCarthy, D. S. (2012). Farmers′ perception and adaptation to climate change: A case study of Sekyedumase district in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(4), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gay, C., Estrada, F., Conde, C., Eakin, H., & Villers, L. (2006). Potential impacts of climate change on agriculture: A case of study of coffee production in Veracruz, Mexico. Climatic Change, 79, 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giorgi, F. (2006). Climate change hot-spots. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L08707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gliessman, S. R. (2008). Agroecological foundations for designing sustainable coffee agroecosystems. In C. M. Bacon, V. E. Méndez, S. R. Gliessman, D. Goodman, & J. A. Fox (Eds.), Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America (pp. 27–42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haggar, J., & Schepp, K. (2012). Coffee and climate change: Impacts and options for adaptation in Brazil, Guatemala, Tanzania and Vietnam. Climate Change, Agriculture and Natural Resources Working Paper Series, No. 4. London: Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich. http://www.nri.org/docs/promotional/D5930-11_NRI_Coffee_Climate_Change_WEB.pdf.
  22. Holt-Giménez, E. (2002). Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: A case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imbach, P., Molina, L., Locatelli, B., Roupsard, O., Mahé, G., Neilson, R., et al. (2012). Modeling potential equilibrium states of vegetation and terrestrial water cycle of Mesoamerica under climate change scenarios. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13(2), 665–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  25. Jaffee, D. (2007). Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Laderach, P., Lundy, M., Jarvis, A., Ramirez, J., Perez Portilla, E., Schepp, K., et al. (2011). Predicted impact of climate change on coffee supply chains. In W. L. Filho (Ed.), The economic, social and political elements of climate change. Climate Change Management series (pp. 703–723). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewin, B., Giovannucci, D., & Varangis, P. (2004). Coffee markets: New paradigms in global supply and demand. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  28. Lin, B. B. (2010). The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(4), 510–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McSweeney, K., & Coomes, O. T. (2011). Climate-related disaster opens a window of opportunity for rural poor in northeastern Honduras. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the United States of America, 108(13), 5203–5208. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069189/.
  30. Mertz, O., Mbow, C., Reenberg, A., & Diouf, A. (2009). Farmers’ perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation strategies in rural Sahel. Environmental Management, 43, 804–816.Google Scholar
  31. Moguel, P., & Toledo, V. M. (1999). Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology, 13(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nielsen, J. O., & Reenberg, A. (2010). Temporality and the problem with singling out climate as a current driver of change in a small West African village. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(4), 464–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nzeadibe, T., Egbule, C. L., Chukwuone, N. A., Agwu, A. E., & Agu, V. C. (2012). Indigenous innovations for climate change adaptation in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(6), 901–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perfecto, I., & Armbrecht, I. (2003). The coffee agroecosystem in the neotropics: Combining ecological and economic goals. In J. Vandermeer (Ed.), Tropical agroecosystems (pp. 159–194). Washington, DC: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  35. Perfecto, I., Rice, R. A., Greenberg, R., & Van der Voort, M. E. (1996). Shade coffee: A disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience, 46, 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Philpott, S., Lin, B., Jha, S., & Brines, S. (2008). A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 128(1), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pineda Portillo, N. (1997). Geografia de Honduras.ion, 3rd edn. Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras.Google Scholar
  38. Pohlan, H. A. J. (2006). El cafetal del futuro. In J. Pohlan, L. Soto, & J. Barrera (Eds.), El cafetal del futuro: Realidades y visiones (pp. 3–14). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Pohlan, H. A. J., & Pérez Romero, A. (2006). Diversificación productive con rambután (Nephelium lappaceum L.). In J. Pohlan, L. Soto, & J. Barrera (Eds.), El cafetal del futuro: Realidades y visiones (pp. 243–256). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Reardon, T., Berdegué, J., & Escobar, G. (2001). Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: Overview and policy implications. World Development, 29(3), 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Renard, M.-C. (1999). The interstices of globalization: The example of fair coffee. Sociologia Ruralis, 39, 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Risbey, J., Kandlikar, M., Dowlatabadi, H., & Graetz, D. (1999). Scale, context and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romero Leon, K., Houston, J. E., & Epperson, J. E. (2006). Diversification in low-grade coffee-growing areas of Veracruz, Mexico: Market possibilities. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 37(1), 143–148.Google Scholar
  44. Romero-Alvarado, Y., Soto-Pinto, L., García-Barrios, L., & Barrera-Gaytán, J. F. (2002). Coffee yields and soil nutrients under the shade of Inga sp. vs. multiple species in Chiapas. Mexico. Agroforestry Systems, 54, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sáenz-Romero, C., Rehfeldt, G., Crookston, N., Duval, P., St-Amant, R., Beaulieu, J., et al. (2010). Spline models of contemporary, 2030, 2060 and 2090 climates for Mexico and their use in understanding climate-change impacts on the vegetation. Climatic Change, 102, 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Samaniego, J. (2009). Climate change and development in Latin America and the Caribbean: Overview 2009. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/7/38147/04_Climate_Change_and_Development_Overview_2009.pdf.
  47. Schipper, E. L. F. (2006). Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Reciel, 15, 82–92.Google Scholar
  48. Schroth, G., Laderach, P., Dempewolf, J., Philpott, S. M., Haggar, J., Eakin, H., et al. (2009). Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14, 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. SMNM (Servicio Meteorológico Nacional de México). (2000a). Normales climatológicas 19712000: Estado de Chiapas: Estación 00007018 Cacahoatán. http://smn.cna.gob.mx/climatologia/normales/estacion/chis/NORMAL07018.TXT.
  50. SMNM (Servicio Meteorológico Nacional de México). (2000b). Normales climatológicas 19712000: Estado de Chiapas: Estación 00007355 Unión Zaragoza, Jitotol. http://smn.cna.gob.mx/climatologia/normales/estacion/chis/NORMAL07355.TXT.
  51. Somarriba, E., Beer, J., & Muschler, R. G. (2001). Research methods for multistrata agroforestry systems with coffee and cacao: Recommendations from two decades of research at CATIE. Agroforestry Systems, 53, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spoor, M. (2000). Two decades of adjustment and agricultural development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Economic Reforms series, No. 56. Santiago, Chile: Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía, División de Población de la CEPAL.Google Scholar
  53. Talbot, J. M. (2004). Grounds for agreement: The political economy of the coffee commodity chain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  54. Tejeda-Cruz, C., & Sutherland, W. J. (2004). Bird responses to shade coffee production. Animal Conservation, 7, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tucker, C., Eakin, H., & Castellanos, E. (2010). Perceptions of risk and adaptation: Coffee producers, market shocks and extreme weather in Central America and Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 20, 23–32.Google Scholar
  56. UNEP-ECLAC (United Nations Environmental Program–Economic and Social Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). (2010). Vital climate change graphics for Latin America and the Caribbean: Special edition for the COP16/CMP 6, Mexico. Panama City: UNEP-ECLAC.Google Scholar
  57. Van der Vossen, H. A. M. (2005). A critical analysis of the agronomic and economic sustainability of organic coffee production. Experimental Agriculture, 41(4), 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vandermeer, J., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity: The political ecology of rainforest destruction. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  59. Varangis, P., Siegel, P., Giovannucci, D., & Lewin, B. (2003). Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America: Impacts and strategies. Policy Research Working Paper 2993. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  60. Zúñiga Andrade, E. (1990). Las modalidades de la lluvia en Honduras. Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hallie Eakin
    • 1
  • Catherine M. Tucker
    • 2
  • Edwin Castellanos
    • 3
  • Rafael Diaz-Porras
    • 4
  • Juan F. Barrera
    • 5
  • Helda Morales
    • 6
  1. 1.School of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Universidad del Valle de GuatemalaGuatemala CityGuatemala
  4. 4.Centro Internacional de Política Económica para el Desarrollo SostenibleUniversidad Nacional de Costa RicaHerediaCosta Rica
  5. 5.El Colegio de la Frontera SurTapachula, ChiapasMexico
  6. 6.El Colegio de la Frontera SurSan Cristóbal de Las CasasMexico

Personalised recommendations