Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 651–666 | Cite as

The positive psychology of sustainability

  • Víctor Corral Verdugo


As in most areas of psychology, a negative bias permeates the study of the subject of Conservation Psychology: sustainable behavior (SB). SB constitutes the set of actions aimed at protecting the socio-physical environment. This behavior is sometimes addressed as having negative antecedent-instigators (fear, guilt, shame), activated to avoid undesirable outcomes from environmental degradation. Also, psycho-environmental researchers often visualize negative psychological consequences (discomfort, inconvenience, sacrifice) of SB. Yet, a number of studies reveal that positive psychological antecedents (capacities, emotions, virtues and strengths) as well as positive psychological consequences (satisfaction, psychological well-being, and happiness) of SB are also significant determinants of pro-environmental actions. In this paper, I argue that SB is positive behavior originated by positive dispositional factors, and maintained by psychological benefits. By combining the emergent fields of positive psychology and the psychology of sustainability, an alternative approach for the study of the positive psychology of sustainable behavior is outlined.


Sustainability Positive psychology Environmental psychology Sustainable behavior 


  1. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechtel, R., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2010). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Positive psychology as social change. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2002). Environmental psychology: From spatial-physical environment to sustainable development. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 28–54). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, J., & Meyers, C. K. (2007). Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, reputation, and incentives. IZA Discussion Paper, 3021. Retrieved on 19 February 2011 from
  7. Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Corral, V., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. (2010). Social-psychological and contextual predictors of sustainable water consumption. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohn, M., & Fredrikson, B. (2010). In search of durable positive psychology interventions: Predictors and consequences of long-term positive behavior change. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cone, J. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1980). Environmental problems. Behavioral solutions. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
  11. Considine, T. J. (2000). The impacts of weather variations on energy demand and carbon emissions. Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corral-Verdugo, V. (2002). A structural model of pro-environmental competency. Environment and Behavior, 34, 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corral-Verdugo, V., Bonnes, M., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., Frías, M., & Carrus, G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corral-Verdugo, V., Frías, M., & García, C. (2010a). Introduction to the psychological dimensions of sustainability. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Corral-Verdugo, V., García, C., Castro, L., Viramontes, I., & Limones, R. (2010b). Equity and sustainable lifestyles. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Corral-Verdugo, V., Montiel, M., Sotomayor, M., Frías, M., Tapia, C., & Fraijo, B. (2011). Psychological wellbeing as correlate of sustainable behaviors. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4, 31–44.Google Scholar
  17. Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., García, F., Varela, C., Cuen, A., & Barrón, M. (2012). Validation of a scale assessing psychological restoration associated with sustainable behaviours. Psyecology, 3, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawkins, R. (2001). Sustainability does not come naturallyA Darwinian perspective on values, the values platform for sustainability. Inaugural lecture at the Royal Institution. Fishguard, UK: The Environment Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. De Young, R. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick: The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior, 25, 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Young, R. (1996). Some psychological aspects of a reduced consumption lifestyle: The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence motivation. Environment and Behavior, 28, 358–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dickerson, C., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (2009). Foreword. In R. Gilman, E. Huebner, & M. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Diener, E., Emmonds, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ehigie, B., Ideozu, I., & Ehigie, R. (2005). Psychological well-being of inhabitants around oil and gas projects in Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, E8, 2.
  28. Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. (2004). One with Niniveh. Politics, consumption and the human future. Washington, DC: Shearwater Books.Google Scholar
  29. Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S., & Spinrad, T. (2003). Affect and prosocial responding. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fraijo, B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., & González, D. (2010). Promoting pro-environmental competency. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Freud, S. (1964). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Froh, J. (2009). Positive emotions. In S. J. López (Ed.), The encyclopedia of positive psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Geller, E. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing pro-environment behavior. In R. B. Bechtel, A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Geller, E. S., Erickson, J. B., & Buttram, B. A. (1983). Attempts to promote residential water conservation with educational, behavioral and engineering strategies. Population and Environment Behavioral and Social Issues, 6, 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gordon, G., & Crabtree, S. (2006). Building engaged schools: Getting the most out of America’s classrooms. New York: The Gallup Organization.Google Scholar
  36. Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Locus of control, altruism and agentic disposition. Population and Environment, 17, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guerin, D., Crete, J., & Mercier, J. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the determinants of recycling behavior in the European countries. Social Science Research, 30, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hartig, T., Kaiser, F., & Bowler, P. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 590–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heward, W., & Chance, P. (2010). Introduction. Dealing with what is. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 145–151.Google Scholar
  40. Hormuth, S. (1999). Social meaning and social context of environmentally relevant behavior: Shopping, wrapping and disposing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iwata, O. (2001). Attitudinal determinants of environmentally responsible behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jackson, T. (2002). Evolutionary psychology in ecological economics: Consilience, consumption and contentment. Ecological Economics, 41, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Joreiman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaiser, F. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaiser, F., Schultz, P. W., Berenguer, J., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Tankha, G. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism. Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13, 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kals, E. (1996). Are proenvironmental commitments motivated by health concerns or by perceived justice? In L. Montada & M. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  47. Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2002). Sustainable development and emotions. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  48. Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 61, 1188–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kurz, T. (2002). The psychology of environmentally sustainable behavior: Fitting together pieces of the puzzle. Analysis of Social issues and Public Policy, 2, 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lehman, P. H., & Geller, S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 13–32.Google Scholar
  53. Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social issues, 63, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Malott, R. W. (2010). I’ll save the world from global warming—tomorrow: Using procrastination management to combat global warming. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 179–180.Google Scholar
  55. McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meinhold, J., & Malkus, A. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior, 37, 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milfont, T., & Sibley, C. (2011). Exploring the concept of environmental generativity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4, 21–30.Google Scholar
  58. Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., Oliveira, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623–15628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nordlund, A., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm in willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pelletier, L. C., Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., & Noels, K. (1998). Why are we doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 437–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  62. Pettus, A. M., & Gilles, M. P. (1987). Personality characteristics and environmental attitudes. Population and Environment, 9, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pinheiro, J., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2010). Time perspective and sustainable behavior. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Pol, E. (2002). The theoretical background of the city-identity-sustainability network. Environment and Behavior, 34, 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Post, S., & Neimark, J. (2007). Why good things happen to good people. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  66. Pritchard, J. (2010). Virtual rewards for driving green. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 185–187.Google Scholar
  67. Pury, C. (2009). Perseverance. In S. J. López (Ed.), The encyclopedia of positive psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. Ramsey, J. M. (1993). The effects of issue investigation and action training on eight-grade students’ environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 24, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ryff, C., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saunders, C. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10, 137–149.Google Scholar
  73. Scheunpflug, A., & Asbrand, B. (2006). Global education and education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 12, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schmuck, P., & Schultz, P. W. (2002). Sustainable development as a challenge for psychology. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., & Piliavin, J. A. (1995). The psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puzzles. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  76. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern. Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values, theoretical advances and empirical test in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seguiner, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Seligman, M. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. López (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Seligman, M., Steen, T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology in progress. Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Serpell, J. A. (2004). Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare, 13, 145–151.Google Scholar
  82. Sevillano, V., Aragonés, J. I., & Schultz, P. W. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39, 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith-Sebasto, N. J., & Fortner, R. W. (1994). The environmental action internal control index. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case for environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–95.Google Scholar
  85. Stokols, D., & Altman, I. (1987). Introduction. In D. Stokols, & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology. Nueva York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  86. Suárez, E. (2010). Problemas ambientales y soluciones conductuales. In J. I. Aragonés & M. Amérigo (Eds.), Psicología Ambiental. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.Google Scholar
  87. Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43, 658–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Talbert, J. (2008). Redefining progress. In L. Starke (Ed.), State of the world. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  89. Van de Vliert, E., & Janssen, O. (2002). “Better than” performance motives as roots of satisfaction across more and less developed countries. Journal of Crosscultural Psychology, 33, 380–397.Google Scholar
  90. Van den Berg, A., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Lange, P. (2000). Cooperation and competition. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Veenhoven, R. (2006). Is life getting better? How long and happy people live in modern society. European Psychologist, 10, 330–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SonoraHermosilloMexico

Personalised recommendations