Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 331–351 | Cite as

Water resources planning and management based on system dynamics: a case study of Yulin city

  • Xiao-jun WangEmail author
  • Jian-yun Zhang
  • Jiu-fu Liu
  • Guo-qing Wang
  • Rui-min He
  • Amgad Elmahdi
  • Sondoss Elsawah
Article

Abstract

Water security is an integral aspect of the socio-economic development in China. Nevertheless, water resources are under persistent pressures because of the growing population, heavy irrigation, climate change effects and short-term policies. Traditional management approaches narrowly focus on increasing supply and reducing demand without considering the complex interactions and feedback loops that govern water resource behaviour. Whereas these approaches may provide quick fix solutions, they often lead to unanticipated, sometimes catastrophic, delayed outcomes. Therefore, water management needs to take a holistic approach that caters to the interdependent physical (e.g. water inflows, outflows) and behavioural (e.g. decision rules, perceptions) processes in the system. Unlike reductionist approaches, System Dynamics (SD) takes a system-level view for modelling and analysing the complex structure (cause–effect relationships, feedback loops, delays) that generates the systemic behaviour. Simulating the SD model allows assessing long-term system-wide impacts, exploring leverage points and communicating results to decision makers. In this paper, we follow an SD modelling approach to examine the future of water security in Yulin City. First, we present a conceptual model for integrating water supply and demand. Based on this, we build an SD model to simulate and analyse the dynamics of water resource over time. The model output is tested to ensure that it satisfactorily replicates the historical behaviour of the system. The model is used to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of various supply/demand management options. Three scenarios are designed and examined: business-as-usual, supply management, and demand management. Results show that current management regime cannot effectively meet the future water demand. Whereas supply acquisition provides short-term benefits, it cannot cope with the growing population. A combination of conservation measures and demand-management instruments is regarded the most effective strategy for balancing supply and demand.

Keywords

System dynamics Water resources Water demand management Water conservation Yulin city 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2010CB951104), (No. 2010CB951103) and Non-profit Industry Program of the Ministry of Water Resource of the People’s Republic of China (No. 200801001) for financial support of this research. Thanks also to the helpful comments received from the anonymous reviewers and the editors.

References

  1. Ahmad, S., & Simonovic, S. P. (2004). Spatial system dynamics: New approach for simulation of water resources systems [J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18(4), 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Born, S., & Sonzogni, W. (1995). Integrated environmental management: Strengthening the conceptualization. Environmental Management [J], 19(2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brierley, G., & Fryirs, K. A. (Eds.). (2008). River futures: An integrative scientific approach to river repair. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L., & Flavin, C. (1999). A new economy for a new century. State of the World. 3–21.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, D., & Memon, F. A. (2006). Water demand management [M]. London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Elmahdi, A., Malano, H., & Etchells, T. (2007). Using system dynamics to model water-reallocation [J]. Environmentalist, 27, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glantz, M. (1999). Sustainable development and creeping environmental problems. In M. Glantz (Ed.), Creeping environmental problems and sustainable development in the Aral Sea basin (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gumbo, B. (2004). The status of water demand management in selected cities of southern Africa [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 1225–1331.Google Scholar
  9. Guo, H. C., Liu, L., & Huang, G. H. (2001). A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: A study for the Lake Erhai Basin [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 61, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hjorth, P., & Bagheri, A. (2006). Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach [J]. Futures, 38(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holling, C., & Meffe, G. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management [J]. Conservation Biology, 10(2), 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakeman, A., Letcher, R., Newham, L., & Norton, J. (2005). Integrated catchment modelling: Issues and opportunities to support improved sustainability outcomes. In Proceedings of the 29th hydrology and water resources symposium, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Karavezyris, V., Timpe, K. P., & Marzi, R. (2002). Application of system dynamics and fuzzy logic to forecasting of municipal solid waste [J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 60, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rogers, P., de Silva, R., & Bhatia, R. (2002). Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability [J]. Water Policy, 4, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Savenije, H., & van der Zaag, P. (2002). Water as an economic good and demand management paradigms with pitfalls [J]. Water International, 27(1), 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stephenson, D. (1999). Demand management theory [J]. Water SA, 25(2), 115–122.Google Scholar
  17. Sterman, J. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems [J]. System Dynamics Review, 10, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Sun, Y. F., Guo, H.-C., & Qu, G.-Y. (2002). A system dynamics approach for sustainable development in the Miyun reservoir area, China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 12(2), 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ventana Systems, Inc. (2003). Vensim 5 reference manual [M]. (http://www.vensim.com).
  21. Wheida, E., & Verhoeven, R. (2007). An alternative solution of the water shortage problem in Libya [J]. Water Resource Manage, 21, 961–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Winz, I., Brierley, G., & Trowsdale, S. (2009). The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management [J]. Water Resources Management, 23(7), 1301–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolstenholme, E. (1990). System enquiry: A system dynamics approach. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Xu, Z. X., Takeuchi, K., & Ishidaira, H. (2002). Sustainability analysis for Yellow River water resources using the system dynamics approach [J]. Water Resources Management, 16, 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., & Lin, C.-F. (2003). Development of system dynamics model for sustainable land use management [J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 26(5), 607–618.Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, H. L. (2005). Strategic study for water management in China [M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Zhang, X. H., Zhang, H. W., & Chen, B. (2008). Water resources planning based on complex system dynamics: A case study of Tianjin city [J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 13, 2328–2336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao-jun Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jian-yun Zhang
    • 2
  • Jiu-fu Liu
    • 1
  • Guo-qing Wang
    • 2
  • Rui-min He
    • 2
  • Amgad Elmahdi
    • 3
  • Sondoss Elsawah
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Hydrology and Water ResourcesNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjingChina
  2. 2.Research Centre for Climate ChangeMinistry of Water ResourcesNanjingChina
  3. 3.Urban Water Balance, Climate and Water DivisionBureau of MeteorologyMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management (iCAM)Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations