New perspectives on the energy return on (energy) investment (EROI) of corn ethanol
- First Online:
Research on corn ethanol is overly focused on whether corn ethanol is a net energy yielder and, consequently, has missed some other fundamental issues, including (1) whether there is significant error associated with current estimates of the EROI of corn ethanol, (2) whether there is significant spatial variability in the EROI of corn ethanol production, (3) whether yield increases will translate linearly to increases in EROI, (4) the extent to which assumptions about co-product credits impact the EROI of corn ethanol, and (5) how much of the ethanol production from biorefineries is net energy. We address all of these concerns in this research by: (1) performing a meta-error analysis of the calculation of EROI, (2) calculating the EROI for 1,287 counties across the United States, and (3) performing a sensitivity analysis for the values of both yield and co-products within the calculation of EROI. Our results show that the average EROI calculated from the meta-error analysis was 1.07 ± 0.2, meaning that we are unable to assert whether the EROI of corn ethanol is greater than one. The average EROI calculated across 1,287 counties in our spatial analysis was 1.01, indicating that the literature tended to use optimal values for energy inputs and outputs compared to the average conditions across the Unites States. Increases in yield had a trivial impact on EROI, while co-product credits had a large impact on EROI. Based on our results from the spatial analysis and the location of biorefineries across the United States, we conclude that the net energy supplied to society by ethanol is only 0.8% of that supplied from gasoline. Recent work indicates that only energy sources extracted at EROIs of 3:1 or greater have the requisite net energy to sustain the infrastructure of the transportation system of the United States. In light of this work, we conclude that production of corn ethanol within the United States is unsustainable and requires energy subsidies from the larger oil economy.
KeywordsCorn Ethanol EROI Net energy Gradients Spatial analysis
- ESRI. (2007). ESRI geographic software. http://www.esri.com/. Accessed 12 Oct 2007.
- Graboski, M. S. (2004). A rebuttal to “Ethanol Fuels: Energy, economics and environmental impacts” by D. Pimentel.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. A. S., Cleveland, C. J., & Berger, M. (1981). Energy return on investment for United States petroleum, coal, and uranium. In W. Mitsch (Ed.), Energy and Ecological Modeling (pp. 715–724). Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. A. S., Kaufmann, R., & Cleveland, C. J. (1986). Energy and resource quality: The ecology of the economic process. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. A. S., Stanford, J. A., & Hauer, F. R. (1992). The distribution and abundance of organisms as a consequence of energy balances along multiple environmental gradients. OIKOS, 65, 377–390.Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, R., & Cleveland, C. J. (2007). Environmental science. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Liska, A. J., Yang, H. S., Bremer, V. R., Klopfenstein, T. J., Walters, D. T., Erickson, G. E., et al. (2008). Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of corn-ethanol. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 00, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Lovering, T. S. (1969). Mineral resources from the land. In P. Cloud (Ed Resources and Man) (pp. 109–134). San Fransisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Odum, H. T. (1973). Energy, ecology, and economics. Ambio, 2(6), 220–227.Google Scholar
- RFA. (2009). Renewable fuels association. www.ethanolrfa.org. Accessed 15 Sept 2009.
- Ricardo, D. (1821). On the principles of the political economy and taxation. London, England: J.M. Dent and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Shapouri, H., Duffield, J. A., McAloon, A., & Wang, M. (2004). The 2001 net energy balance of corn-ethanol. Corn Utilization and Technology Conference. Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
- Shapouri, H., Duffield, J. A., & Wang, M. (2002). The energy balance of corn ethanol: An update. US Department of Agriculture, Office of the Chief Economist. Report No. 814.Google Scholar
- USCB. (2007). United States census bureau: Census bureau geography. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/. Accessed 20 Oct 2007.
- USDA. (2009). United States department of agriculture, Economic Research Service. www.ers.usda.gov/data/fertilizeruse/. Accessed 16 Sept 2009.
- Wang, M. (2001). Development and use of GREET 1.6 Fuel-Cycle model for transportation fuels and vehicle technologies. Argonne National Laboratory. Report No. ANL/ESD/TM-163.Google Scholar
- Wang, M., Saricks, C., & Wu, M. (1997). Fuel-cycle fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of fuel ethanol produced from U.S. Midwest corn. Center for transportation research, Argonne National Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Wang, M., Wu, M., & Huo, H. (2007). Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environmental Research Letters, 1–13.Google Scholar