Toward an integrated marine protected areas policy: connecting the global to the local
- 526 Downloads
Policy development related to marine protected areas (MPAs) occurs at three levels: international, national, and local. Recent developments with MPAs highlight their close links to broader national-level park and protected area policies, which in turn take their lead from initiatives and recommendations initiated, and increasingly dictated, by international organizations. Local-level inputs to MPA policies have tended to be limited to the immediate local area context despite the vital importance of community-level support and knowledge in meeting broader regional goals of marine conservation tied to networked MPAs. In this paper, we highlight the mechanisms to facilitate cooperation and communication among international, national, and local levels of policy and practice needed to address this deficit. These include the creation of a social network of institutions that both internationalizes and localizes MPA policy development, facilitating a more meaningful engagement of local people through their legitimate participation in national and international MPA gatherings. In addition, mechanisms to formalize partnerships, feedback information, resolve conflicts, and report accountabilities are needed. The success of the latter will depend on the level of recognition and support given to community-level institutions as opposed to the suite of technical training and short-term project-based interventions that have characterized local support over recent decades.
KeywordsMarine protected area policy Governance
This is a contribution from Project Seahorse. We are most grateful to Jackie Alder, Les Lavkulich, Rashid Sumaila, and Paul Watts for comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by the International Development Research Centre-Canada and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation with additional support from the Project Seahorse partnership for marine conservation with the John G. Shedd Aquarium.
- Adams, A. B. (Ed.). (1962). Proceedings of the first world conference on national parks, June 30-July 7. Washington, D.C. USA: National Park Service. United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
- Adams, W. M. (2003). Nature and the colonial mind. In W. M. Adams & M. Mulligan (Eds.), Decolonizing nature: Strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era (pp. 33–42). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Alcorn, J. B., Luque, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2005). Global governance and institutional trends affecting protected areas management: Challenges and opportunities arising from democratization and globalization. Parks Canada, Ottawa, Ontario: In Governance of Protected Areas.Google Scholar
- Aqorau, T. (2003). Obligations to protect marine ecosystems under international conventions and other legal instruments: Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem (pp. 25–40). Rome: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
- Batongbacal, J. (2003). Who’s afraid of municipal waters? The Online Magazine for Sustainable Seas, v. 6 (3). Available at: http://www.oneocean.org/overseas/200303/index.html, 6. Accessed 20 October 2009.
- Boer, B., Ramsay, R., & Rothwell, D. R. (1998). International environmental law in the Asia Pacific. Great Britain: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
- Breton, Y., Brown, D., Davy, B., Haughton, M., & Ovares, L. (Eds.). (2006). Coastal resource management in the wider Caribbean: Resilience, adaptation, and community diversity. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre-Canada.Google Scholar
- Brody, S. D. (1998). An evaluation of the establishment processes for Marine Protected Areas in the Gulf of Maine: Understanding the role of community involvement and public participation. Gulf of Maine Council: Gulf of Maine Marine Protected Areas Project.Google Scholar
- Buckingham-Hatfield, S., Buckingham, S., & Percy, S. (1999). Constructing local environmental agendas: People, places, and participation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Castro, G., & Locker, I. (2000). Mapping conservation investments: An assessment of biodiversity funding in Latin America and the Caribbean: WWF Biodiversity Support Program.Google Scholar
- Charnovitz, S. (1996). Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Michigan Journal of International Law, 18, 183.Google Scholar
- Christie, P. (2004). Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in Southeast Asia. In J. B. Shipley (Ed.), Aquatic protected areas as fisheries management tools: Design, use, and evaluation of these fully protected areas (pp. 155–164). Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
- Dungog, F. J. (1998). Boy killed for “poaching”; marine sanctuary declared void. Cebu Daily News, 25 June 1998.Google Scholar
- Erdman, M., Merrill, P. R., Mongdong, M., Arsyad, I., Harahap, Z., Pangalila, R., & Elverawati Baworo, P. (2004). Building effective co-management systems for decentralized protected areas management in Indonesia: Bunaken National Park case study. Jakarta: Natural Resources Management Program. Available online at http://www.irgltd.com/Resources/Publications/ANE/2004-05%20Bunaken%20National%20Park.pdf. Accessed 02 October 2009.
- Francis, J., Nilsson, A., & Waruinge, D. (2002). Marine protected areas in the eastern African region: How successful are they? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31(7), 503–511.Google Scholar
- Frank, D. J., Meyer, J. W., Hironaka, A., Schofer, E., & Tuma, N. B. (1999). Rationalized environmental discourse in world society. In world polity in formation: A century of international non-governmental organization (pp. 1870–1995). Stanford University Press: Stanford.Google Scholar
- Gell, F. R., & Roberts, C. M. (2002). The fishery effects of marine reserves and fishery closures. Washington D.C.: WWF–US.Google Scholar
- GESAMP. (2001). A sea of trouble. GESAMP Reports and Studies no. 70: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
- Gezon, L. (1997). Institutional structure and the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development projects: Case study from Madagascar. Human Organization, 56(4), 462–470.Google Scholar
- Guénette, S., Chuenpagdee, R., & Jones, R. (2000). Marine protected areas with an emphasis on local communities and indigenous peoples: A review. Fish Center Research Report, 8(1), 57.Google Scholar
- Gustave, R. (2005). The question of ecotourism benefits: A case study from Komodo National Park. Paper presented in workshop on conservation for/by whom? Social controversies and cultural contestations regarding national parks and reserves in the Malay Archipelago, 16–18 May 2005.Google Scholar
- ICSF. (2006). Statement on marine protected areas: Local and traditional fishing community perspectives. International Collaborative in Support of Fish Workers (ICSF). Available at http://www.icsf.net/icsf2006/jspFiles/mpa/overview.jsp. Accessed 15 September 2009.
- IUCN. (2003). Fifth IUCN World parks congress, recommendation V.22, p.91. Durban, South Africa, 8-17 September 2003. Available at: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/recommendation.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2009.
- IUCN. (2005). Benefits beyond boundaries: Proceedings of the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ix + 306 pp.: IUCN.Google Scholar
- IUCN-MOFi. (2006). Marine and coastal wetlands: Education network, capacity building, and training. Hanoi: Viet Nam IUCN.Google Scholar
- Kelleher, G., & Kenchington, R. (1992). Guidelines for establishing protected marine areas: A marine conservation and development report. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. vii + 79 pp.Google Scholar
- Lavides, M. N., & Tiburcio, F. (2002). Building a national community of local coastal resource managers in the Philippines. In W. L. Campos, C. Belda, & P. D. Aliño (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd national workshop on the formulation of a national fish sanctuary strategy (pp. 90–99). Visayas Iloilo, Philippines: University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
- Lim, T. M. S. (2005). The national integrated protected area system of the Philippines. CBD News special edition: Protected areas for achieving biodiversity targets (p.20). Available at http://www.cms.int/pdf/en/news-pa-supplement-en.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2009.
- LMMA. (2005). Locally-managed marine area network: Improving the practice of marine conservation. http://www.lmmanetwork.org. Accessed 12 October 2009.
- Lundy, P. (1999). Community participation in Jamaican conservation projects. Community Development Journal, 34(2), 122–132.Google Scholar
- McNeely, J. A., & Miller, K. R. (1982). National parks, conservation and development: The role of protected areas in sustaining society. Proceedings of the 3rd world congress on national parks, 11–22 October 1982. Bali, Indonesia: IUCN.Google Scholar
- Narayan, D., & Shah, T. (2000). Connecting the local to the global: Voices of the poor, proceedings of the workshop on local to global connectivity for voices of the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and reality in the rain forest: How conservation strategies are failing in West Africa. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Rajagopalan, R. (2008). The Samudra monograph–Marine protected areas in India: Chennai. India: International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.Google Scholar
- Roberts, C. M., & Hawkins, J. P. (2000). Fully-protected marine reserves: A guide, USA: WWF.Google Scholar
- Rohrschneider, R., & Dalton, R. J. (2008). A global network? Transnational cooperation among environmental groups. The Journal of Politics, 64(02), 510–533.Google Scholar
- Samdhana Institute. (2004). Engaging our community–The Philippine stories. Available at http://www.samdhana.org/stories.php. Accessed 20 October 2009.
- Sanjayan, M. A., Shen, S., & Jansen, M. (1997). Experiences with integrated conservation development projects in Asia. World Bank Technical Paper No. 388, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
- Stairs, K., & Taylor, P. (1992). Non-governmental organizations and the legal protection of the oceans: A case study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for nature. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- UN-ECOSOC. (2009). List of non-governmental organizations in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council as of 1 September 2009. Available at http://esango.un.org. Accessed 10 September 2009.
- UNEP. (1995). United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Report to the second meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. Decision II/10: Conservation and sustainable use of marine and coastal biological diversity. UNEP/CBD/COP/2/6-17, November 1995.Google Scholar
- UNEP. (2006). Report to the eighth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (Decision VIII/15, Annex IV): UNEP/CBD/COP/2/6-17 November 1995.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2002). Plan of implementation of the world summit on sustainable development, division for sustainable development, chapter IV. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf. Accessed 25 October 2009.
- Wells, S., & White, A. T. (1995). Involving the community. In S. Gubbay (Ed.), Marine protected areas: Principles and techniques for management (pp. 61–84). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Wetlands International. (2009). Ramsar sites information service. Available at http://ramsar.wetlands.org/Database/. Accessed 30 October 2009.
- Wilkinson, C. (2004). Status of coral reefs of the world. Townsville: Australian Inst. of Marine Science.Google Scholar
- Wilson, D. C., Nielsen, J. R., & Degnbol, P. (2003). The fisheries co-management experience: Accomplishments, challenges, and prospects. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Winter, M. (1996). Rural politics: Policies for agriculture, forestry and the environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- World Bank. (2006). Scaling up marine management: The role of marine protected areas 1100 pp). World Bank Report #36635-GLB.Washington. D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar