Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 313–327 | Cite as

Accounting for human behavior, local conditions and organizational constraints in humanitarian development models

  • Evan ThomasEmail author
  • Bernard Amadei
Article

Abstract

The current trend in foreign aid is toward small-scale sustainable development projects in partnership with defined communities. However, these projects are subject to the influences of self-interested human behavior, poorly defined community structures and resources and organizational constraints that can prevent full realization of development models. Under these constraints, attempting participatory community development models to the exclusion of other techniques may not be the most effective way to achieve positive change. Instead, development agencies should consider adopting other proven elements of development in combination with the spirit of community development to achieve a positive impact within the community and organizational structures and ensure accountability for success. A small-scale attempted, sustainable development case study in Rwanda is reviewed, as well as a new concept for larger scale development integrating ‘carbon credits’. Additionally, a development accreditation organization is proposed to ensure additional accountability in this field.

Keywords

Sustainable development Rwanda Carbon credits EWB-USA Capacity building Case study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank our colleagues at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Engineers without Borders-USA and the Manna Energy Foundation for their tireless efforts to improve the lives of people around the world and for their thoughtful reviews of this paper.

References

  1. Barton, T. G., Barton, T. et al. (1997). Our people, our resources: Supporting rural communities in participatory action research on population dynamics and the local environment, IUCN-The World Conservation Union.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L. D. (2009). Creating credibility: Legitimacy and accountability for transnational civil society. Sterling: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  3. CSVBD. (2005). The village earth model for sustainable village-based development, consortium for sustainable village-based development. Consortium for Sustainable Village-Based Development.Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Adult.Google Scholar
  5. Easterly, W. (2003). Can foreign aid buy growth? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 23–48. doi: 10.1257/089533003769204344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterly, W. (2006). The white man’s burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much I’ll and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ebrahim, A. (2005). NGOs and organizational change: Discourse, reporting, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gibson, C., Andersson, K., et al. (2005). The samaritan’s dilemma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gold, M., Thomas, E., et al. (2007). Development and implementation of the bring your own water treatment system in dense, rural, and mountainous Rwandan communities. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Development, 2(1), 10–28.Google Scholar
  10. GoR. (2006). Mechanisms for participation and accountability at community and decentralized levels in Rwanda. Kigali: Government of Rwanda.Google Scholar
  11. Hatch, H. (2007). “Workshop seeks mentors to guide Afghanistan’s reconstruction” from http://pubs.asce.org/magazines/ascenews/2007/Issue_08-07/news3.htm.
  12. Hazeltine, B., & Bull, C. (2003). Field guide to appropriate technology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Mayhew, C., & Simmon, R. (2000). “Earth at night” from http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html.
  15. MWH. (2005). Water treatment principles and design. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, C., Feyerabend, B., et al. (1994). The wealth of communities. Sterling: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  17. USAID. (2008). Distribution of point of use water treatment product through Mutual Health Organizations in Rwanda: Baseline survey results. Washington: USAID.Google Scholar
  18. WASH (2004). Listening, water supply and sanitation collaborative council.Google Scholar
  19. White, G. (2009). “Water partners international.” Retrieved March 16, 2009, from www.water.org.
  20. White, G., Bradley, D., et al. (1972). Drawers of water: Domestic water use in East Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Zaidi, S. (1999). NGO failure and the need to bring back the state. Journal of International Development, 11, 259–271. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199903/04)11:2<259::AID-JID573>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering for Developing Communities, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations