Local knowledge and training towards management

  • Alpina BegossiEmail author


The urgency of managing marine resources is based on the fact that half of the world stocks are fully exploited, excluding those stocks that are already depleted. Artisanal fisheries in Brazil, both inland and coastal, are responsible for about half of the country’s catches. Therefore, management of local artisanal fisheries is a necessity that provides an additional benefit, considering the observation that decentralization and the use of local ecological knowledge (LEK) in management have given better results than centralized, top-down management. In this study, a third system of knowledge–based on practice and training–is built from the local and scientific systems of knowledge, and a method to accomplish practical steps in local management is shown. Four elements are considered for the process of linking systems towards management: (1) an understanding of the natural environment of the fishery and on the use of natural resources by locals; (2) the knowledge of the marine area used by fishers, i.e., location of fishing spots for each species; (3) the understanding of fisher behavior, e.g., using tools from optimal foraging theory; and (4) the knowledge fishers have of the biology and ecology of species and their LEK, based on studies of the ethnobiology, ethnoecology, and ethnotaxonomy of fish. Considering the availability of publications on topics 1 and 2, illustrative cases are shown using optimal foraging models in Itaipu Beach, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo Bagre, Cananéia, São Paulo, and using common snook, Centropomus undecimalis, as an example for a target species. Finally, local programs including training courses using both scientific and local knowledge are proposed within coastal artisanal fisheries.


Atlantic Forest Fisheries Management Optimal foraging Snook 



I am grateful to E. Camargo for help in marking fishing spots at Bertioga and Guarujá, São Paulo; to FAPESP grants: 06/50435-0 and 06/59743-9). Key suggestions were given by R. A. M. Silvano and P. L. MacCord. Salvador Carpi Jr. drew the spot map.


  1. Aliaume, C., Zerbi, A., Joyeux, J. C., & Miller, J. M. (2000). Growth of juvenile Centropomus undecimalis in a tropical island. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 59, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, P. B., & Petrere Jr. M. (1989). Amazon fisheries: Assessment methods, current status and management options. Canadian Special Pub. in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 385–398.Google Scholar
  3. Begossi, A. (1992). The use of optimal foraging theory in the understanding of fishing strategies: A case from Sepetiba Bay (Rio de Janeiro state, Brasil). Human Ecology, 20(4), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begossi, A. (2001a). Mapping spots: Fishing areas and territories in the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Regional Environmental Change, 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Begossi, A. (2001b). Cooperative and territorial resources: Brazilian artisanal fisheries. In J. Burger, R. Norgaard, E. Ostrom, D. Policansky, & B. Goldstein (Eds.), The commons revisited: An Americas perspective (pp. 109–130). Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  6. Begossi, A. (2006). Temporal stability in fishing spots: Conservation and co-management in Brazilian artisanal coastal fisheries, Ecology & Society, 11(1), 5 (
  7. Begossi, A., & Brown, D. (2003). Fisheries co-management experiences in Latin America, the Caribbean. In D. C. Wilson, J. R. Nielsen, & P. Degnbol (Eds.), The fisheries co-management experience (pp. 135–152). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.Google Scholar
  8. Begossi, A., Clauzet, M., Castro, F., Hanazaki, N., MacCord, P. F., Ramires, M., & Silvano, R. A. M. (2006, October). The foraging behavior of riverine and coastal fishers from the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest coast. Paper presented at the XIV International Meeting of the Society for Human Ecology, Bar Harbor, Maine, unpublished.Google Scholar
  9. Begossi, A., & Garuana, L. (2006). O conhecimento dos peixes no Posto 6, Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro. São Paulo: Folder FIFO/UNICAMP.Google Scholar
  10. Begossi, A., Hanazaki, N., & Peroni N. (2000). Knowledge and use of biodiversity in Brazilian hot spots. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2(3–4), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Begossi, A., Hanazaki, N., & Ramos, R. M. (2004a). Food chain and the reasons for food taboos in the Amazon and in the Atlantic Forest coast. Ecological Applications, 14(5), 1334–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Begossi, A, Hanazaki, N., & Tamashiro, J. Y. (2002). Medicinal plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil): Knowledge, use, and conservation. Human Ecology, 30(3), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Begossi, A., Silva, A. L., Hanazaki, N., Peroni, N., Pezzuti, J., & Silvano, R. A. M. (2004b). Ecologia de Pescadores da Mata Atlântica e Amazônia. São Paulo: Ed. Hucitec.Google Scholar
  14. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Berkes, F., Mahon, R., McConney, P., Pollnac, R. e Pomeroy, R. (2001). Managing small-scale fisheries. Canadá: IDRC-CRDI (booktíque,
  16. Carvalho-Filho, A. (1994). Peixes da Costa Brasileira. SP: SABESP.Google Scholar
  17. Cordell, J. (1989). A sea of small boats. Cambridge: Cultural Survival.Google Scholar
  18. Cordell, J. (2006). Scaling up marine management, the role of marine protected areas. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  19. Davy, B. (2000). Foreword. In F. Berkes, R. Mahon, P. McConney, R. Pollnac, & R. Pomeroy (Eds.), Managing small-scale fisheries. Canadá: IDRC-CRDI (booktíque,
  20. Diegues, A. C. (1983). Pescadores, camponeses e trabalhadores do mar. São Paulo: Ed. Ática.Google Scholar
  21. FAO (2005). Review of the world marine fishery resources. FAO Technical Paper 47 (
  22. Forman, S. (1967). Cognition and the catch: The location of fishing spots in a Brazilian coastal village. Ethnology, 6, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Froese, R., & Pauly, D. (2006). Fishbase (
  24. Hanazaki, N. (2001). Ecologia de caiçaras: uso de recursos e dieta. Dissertation, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
  25. Hara, M., & e Nielsen, J. R. (2003). Experiences with fisheries management in África. In D. C. Wilson, J. R. Nielsen, & P. Degnbol (Eds.), The Fisheries co-management experience (pp. 81–98). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the Emic/Etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 5, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hauck, M., & e Sowman, M. (2003) Waves of change: Coastal and fisheries co-management in South Africa. Landsowne: The University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hauck, M., & Sowman, M. (2005). Guidelines for implementing coastal and fisheries co- management in South Africa. Subsistence fishing co-management and capacity building programmme. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, University of Western Cape & Dept. of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, South Africa.Google Scholar
  29. Johannes, R. E. (1981). Words of the lagoon. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Johannes, R. E. (2000). Ignore fisher’s knowledge and miss the boat. Fish and Fisheries, 1, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., & Whittington, J. A. (2003). Catch-and-release fishing on a spawning aggregation of common snook: Does it affect reproductive output? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 132, 940–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacCord, P. F., & Begossi, A. (2006). Dietary changes over time in a Caiçara community from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Ecology & Society, 11(2), 38 (
  33. Nehrer, R., & Begossi, A. (2000). Fishing at Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro: Local strategies in a global city. Ciência e Cultura, 52(1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  34. Orians, G. H., & Pearson, E. (1979). On the theory of central place foraging, Analysis of Ecological Systems. In D. J. Honrs, G. R. Stairs, & R. D (Eds.), Columbus: Mitchell, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  35. Peters, K. M., Matheson, R. E., & Taylor, R. G. (1998). Reproduction and early life history of common snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch) in Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62, 509–529.Google Scholar
  36. Pinnegar, J. K., & Engelhard, G. H. (2007). The ‘shifting baseline’ phenomena: A global perspective. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. doi:  10.1007/s11160-007-9058-6.
  37. Pyke, G. H. (1984). Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 523–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruddle, K. (1998). Traditional community based coastal marine fisheries management in Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management, 40, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruddle, K. (2000). Systems of knowledge: Dialogue, relationships and process, Environment. Development and Sustainability, 2, 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silvano, R. A. M. (2004). Pesca artesanal e etnoictiologia. In A. Begossi, Org (Ed.), Ecologia de Pescadores da Mata Atlântica e Amazônia. São Paulo: Ed. Hucitec.Google Scholar
  41. Silvano R. A. M., & Begossi, A. (2005). Local knowledge on a cosmopolitan fish. Ethnoecology of Pomatomus saltatrix (Pomatomidae) in Brazil and Australia. Fisheries Research, 71, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Silvano, R. A. M., Mac Cord, P., & Lima, R. V., e Begossi, A. (2006). When does this fish spawn? Fishermen’s local knowledge of migration and reproduction of Brazilian coastal fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 76, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silvano, R. A. M., Silva, A. L., Ceroni, M., & e Begossi, A. (2007). Contributions of Ethnobiology to the conservation of tropical rivers and streams. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (in press). doi: 10.1002/aqc.825
  44. Souza-Filho, J. J., & Cerqueira, V. R. (2003). Influência da densidade de estocagem no cultivo de juvenis de robalo-flecha mantidos em laboratório. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38, 1317–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, R. G., Grier, H. J., & Whittington, J. A. (1998). Spawning rhythms of common snook in Florida. Journal of Fish Biology, 53, 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, R. G., Whittington, J. A., Grier, H. J., & Crabtree, R. E. (2000). Age, growth, maturation, and protandric sex reversal in common snook, Centropomus undecimalis, from the east and west coasts of South Florida. Fisheries Bulletin, 98, 612–624.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, R. G., Whittington, J. A., & Haymans, D. E. (2001). Catch-and-release mortality of common snook in Florida. North American Journal of Fishery Management, 21, 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilghman, R. W., Ross, C. I., Mari, F., & Hartmann, J. X. (1996). Paralbumins as biomarker for fish species identification, IEEE. doi: 0-7803-3519-8/96
  50. Valbo-Jorgensen, J., & Poulsen, A. F. (2000). Using local knowledge as a research tool in the study of river fish biology: Experiences from the Mekong. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson, D. C., Nielsen, J. R., & Degnbol P. (Eds.) (2003). The fisheries co-management experience. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAPESCA/PREAC/UNICAMPCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Fisheries and Food Institute (FIFO)CampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations