Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 705–723

Governance, institutions and the environment-income relationship: a cross-country study

Article

Abstract

This paper examines the environment-income relationship in the context of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC), and explores the possible role that factors like governance, political institutions, socioeconomic conditions, and education play in influencing this relationship. The results suggest that the EKC exists for carbon dioxide emissions for cross-country data over the period 1984–2002. However, there is nothing automatic about this relationship; policies designed to protect the environment may be responsible for this phenomenon. Two other significant findings are: one, countries with better quality of governance, stronger political institutions, better socioeconomic conditions and greater investment in education have lower emissions; and two, only around 15% of the countries in the dataset have reached income levels high enough to be associated with an unambiguous decline in emissions. The implications of these results are discussed within the context of the international environmental policy arena and the Kyoto Protocol. One of the main objectives of this paper is to bridge the gap between studies conducted on the EKC and developments in the international environmental policy arena. As a final note this paper emphasizes that one needs to connect the body of knowledge on the EKC hypothesis to the international environmental policy arena, despite the apparent difficulty of doing so. One hopes that future studies will further build on this line of thought.

Keywords

Climate change Sustainable development Kyoto Protocol Environmental Kuznets Curve International environmental law and policy 

References

  1. Barros, F. G., Mendonca, A. F., & Nogueira, J. M. (2002). Poverty and environmental degradation: The Kuznets environmental curve for the Brazilian case. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No. 267, Universidade De Brasília.Google Scholar
  2. Borghesi, S. (2000). Income inequality and the environmental kuznets curve. Fondazione Enrico Mattei, Nota di lavoro No. 83.2000, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., & Bates, J. M. (1997). The environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Constantini, V., & Martini, C. (2006). A modified environmental Kuznets curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data. Fondazione Enrico Mattei, Nota di lavoro No. 148.2006, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, M. A. (2007). Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 62, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, S., Wheeler, D., Roy, S., & Mody, A. (1995). Environmental regulation and development: A cross country empirical analysis. World Bank Working Paper Series WPS 1448, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. De Bruyn, S. M. (1997). Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: Structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur dioxide emissions. Environment And Development Economics, 2, 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Bruyn, S. M., Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Opschoor, J. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 25, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deacon, R. T. (2005). Dictatorship, democracy, and the provision of public goods. Department of Economics Working Paper, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  10. Deacon, R. T., & Norman, C. S. (2004). Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve an Empirical Regularity? Department of Economics Working Paper, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  11. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Greenhouse gases, climate change, and energy. Retrieved May 30, 2007 from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggccebro/chapter1.html.
  12. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper Series, Paper 3914, NBER, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harbaugh, W., Levinson, A., & Wilson, D. (2002). Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Review of Economics and Statistics 2002. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter D., Salzman J., & Zaelke, D. (2002). International environmental law and policy (2nd ed.). New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jalal, K. F. (1993). Sustainable development, environment and poverty nexus. Research paper, Occasional Paper Series, Asian Development Bank, Manila.Google Scholar
  17. Kolstad, C. D. (2006). Interpreting estimated environmental Kuznets curves for greenhouse gases. Journal of Environment & Development, 15(1), 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper Series WP238, International Labor Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  19. Panayotou, T. (1997). An inquiry into population, resources, and environment. In Ahlberg, D. A., Kelley, A. C., & Mason, K. O. (Eds.), The impact of population growth on well being in developing countries. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Quibria, G. M. (2006). Does governance matter? Yes, no or maybe: Some evidence from developing Asia. Kyklos, 59(1), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers, P., Jalal, K. F. & Boyd, J. A. (2006). An introduction to sustainable development. Cambridge: Harvard Division of Continuing Education.Google Scholar
  22. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? Journal of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, 27, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 757–773.Google Scholar
  24. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, WPS 904, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  25. Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global environmental governance. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  26. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic Growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24, 1151–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Kyoto Protocol Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/background/items/2878.php.
  29. World Commission on Environment, Development, Brundtland Commission Report (1987). Our common future. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Yandle, B., Vijayaraghavan, M., & Bhattarai, M. (2004). The environmental Kuznets curve: A review of findings, methods, and policy implications. PERC research study, Property and Environment Research Center, Montana.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations