Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 899–912 | Cite as

A review of a community-based approach to combating land degradation: dryland salinity management in Australia

  • Ross KingwellEmail author
  • Michele John
  • Michael Robertson


Degradation of farmland caused by salinisation is a major environmental issue in Australia. To combat salinisation a community-based approach has been adopted. This paper reviews the nature and effectiveness of this approach, describing its rationale, strengths and weaknesses. The community-based approach is shown to have been highly successful in raising awareness and providing education about the problem of dryland salinity in Australia, and has encouraged group participation in managing the problem. The approach has allowed some internalisation of the externalities associated with dryland salinity, with peer group and community pressure helping to address some salinity problems. However, the approach has not greatly lessened the threat of salinisation. Community and regional groups continue to receive the bulk of salinity management funding yet it is funding for development of new innovations, technologies and policies that is also critical to combating salinity. A conclusion is that there may have been an over-investment in the community-based approach and under-investment in the development of skills and research infrastructure required to develop innovative solutions to lessen the cost of salinity.


Community Salinity Land degradation Land management Agri-environmental programs 


  1. ABARE. (2004). Natural resource management on Australian farms. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, ABARE eReport 04.7, Prepared for the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, May 2004, 49 pp.Google Scholar
  2. ABS. (2002). Salinity on Australian farms (30 pp.). Bulletin 4615.0, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, D. J. (2006). Using grazing systems modelling to assess economic, production and environmental risks to aid in selecting appropriate stocking rates. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46, 841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian National Audit Office. (2005). The administration of the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Performance Audit Report No.17, 2004–05, Available at
  5. ASCC. (1991). Decade of Landcare plan. Canberra, Australia: Australian Soil Conservation Council.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, N. (2005). Australia’s farmers past present and future. Land & Water Australia Fact Sheet, Downloadable at Scholar
  7. Barr, N., Ridges, S., Anderson, N., Gray, I., Crockett, J., Watson, B., & Hall, N. (2000). Adjusting for catchment management: Structural adjustment and its implications for catchment management in the Murray Darling Basin. Canberra: Murray Darling Basin Commission.Google Scholar
  8. Beare, S., Bell, R., Blias, A., Gooday, P., Heaney, A., Hooper, S., Langenkamp, D., Love, G., Levantis, C., Mues, C., Qureshi, E., & Riley, C. (2003). Natural resource management in the Burdekin River catchment: Integrated assessment of resource management at the catchment scale – a case study. ABARE eReport 03.18, Canberra, October 2003, 66 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Beresford, Q., Bekle, H., Phillips, H., & Mulcock, J. (2001). The salinity crisis: landscapes, communities and politics (324 pp.). University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bligh, K. J., Grasby, J. C., & Negus, T. R. (1983). Water erosion, waterlogging and flooding. Journal of Agriculture (West. Aust.), 24, 58–60.Google Scholar
  11. Bowden, J. W., & Jarvis, R. J. (1985). Soil hardpans and plant growth. Journal of Agriculture (West. Aust.), 26, 16–17.Google Scholar
  12. Byron, I., & Curtis, A. (2002). Maintaining volunteer commitment to local watershed initiatives. Environmental Management, 30, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cary, J. W. (1993). Changing foundations for government support of agricultural extension in economically developed countries. Sociologia Ruralis, 23, 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cary, J. W., & Webb, T. (2000). Community landcare, the National Landcare Program and the landcare movement the social dimensions of landcare. Canberra: Social Sciences Centre, Bureau of Rural Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Cary, J., Webb, T., & Barr, N. (2002). Understanding landholders’ capacity to change to sustainable practices: Insights about practice adoption and capacity to change. Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
  16. Commonwealth of Australia. (2005). Working for Australia’s future: Increasing participation in the workforce. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Workplace Relations and Workforce Participation, March 2005, Canberra, 253 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Conacher, A. (1986). Dryland agriculture and secondary salinity. In W. Hanley & H. Cooper (Eds.), Man and the australian environment. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Curtis, A. L. (1997). Landcare, stewardship and biodiversity conservation. In: N. Klomp & I. Lunt (Eds.), Frontiers in ecology building the links (pp. 143–153). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  19. Curtis, A., & De Lacy, T. (1996). Landcare in Australia does it make a difference. Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Curtis, A., & De Lacy, T. (1998). Landcare, stewardship and sustainable agriculture in Australia. Environmental Value, 7, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Curtis, A., Lockwood, M., & MacKay, J. (2001). Exploring landholder willingness and capacity to manage dryland salinity in the Goulburn Broken catchment. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 8, 20–31.Google Scholar
  22. Drake, L., Bergström, P., & Svedsäter, H. (1999). Farmers’ attitudes and uptake. In G. Van Huylenbroeck & M. Whitby (Eds.), Countryside Stewardship farmers, policies and markets. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Feder, G., & Slade, R. H. (1986). Methodological issues in the evaluation of extension impact. In G. E. Jones (Ed.), Investing in rural extension strategies and goals. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Frost, F. M., Hamilton, B., Lloyd, M., & Pannell, D. J. (2001). Salinity: A new balance. The report of the Salinity Taskforce established to review salinity management in Western Australia, Perth, 78 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Frost, F. M., & Marsh, S. P. (2000). Salinity: a major challenge for Western Australian rural communities. Paper presented at the X World Congress of Rural Sociology, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods Building Communities, Protecting Resources, Fostering Human Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 30–Aug 5, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Garnett, A., & Lewis, P. E. T. (1999). Trends in rural labour markets. CLMR Discussion Paper Series 99/9, the Centre for Labour Market Research, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Available at
  27. Gentle, G. (2004). Red Tape Reduction Taskforce Report. Report to the NRM Ministerial Council and the NRM Community Forum, G. Gentle Chairperson, April 2004, Available at
  28. Kemp, A., & Alexander, F. (2000). Land care and degradation: A survey of natural resource management. Australian Farm Surveys Report 2000, ABARE, Canberra.Google Scholar
  29. Keogh, M. (2005). The national dryland salinity audit 5 years on: Is the 17 million hectare estimate still valid or useful? Farm Policy Journal, 2, 19–28.Google Scholar
  30. Kerrin, J. (2006). A retrospective on policy making. Keynote address to the 50th annual conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Manly Pacific, 8–10 February 2006, available at Scholar
  31. Kington, E. A., & Pannell, D. J. (2003). Dryland salinity in the upper Kent River catchment of Western Australia: Farmer perceptions and practices. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 43, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kingwell, R., Hajkowicz, S., Young, J., Patton, D., Trapnell, L., Edward, A., Krause, M., & Bathgate, A. (2003). In R. Kingwell (Ed.), Economic evaluation of salinity management options in cropping regions of Australia. Report to the GRDC & NDSP, ISBN 0-646-42276-6, Canberra, 179 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Kingwell, R., & Pannell, D. (2005). Economic trends and drivers affecting the wheatbelt of Western Australia to 2030. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lockie, S., & Vanclay, F. (1997). Critical Landcare. Key Papers Series 5, Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga.Google Scholar
  35. Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organisational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76, 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsh, S. P. (2001). Social dimensions of Landcare. State Landcare Conference 2001, 11–14 September 2001, Mandurah, Western Australia, pp. 117–128.Google Scholar
  37. Marsh, S. P., & Pannell, D. J. (2000). Agricultural extension policy in Australia: The good, the bad and the misguided. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44, 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsh, S. P., Pannell, D. J., & Lindner, R. K. (1996). Agricultural extension and the rate of adoption of innovations: A case study of the adoption and diffusion of lupins in Western Australia. Final report for RIRDC Project UWA-11A, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  39. McFarlane, D. J., George, R. J., & Caccetta, P. A. (2004). The extent and potential area of salt-affected land in Western Australia estimated using remote sensing and digital terrain models. Paper presented to the 1st National Salinity Engineering Conference, 9–12 November 2004, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  40. MDBC. (1990). Natural resource management strategy. Canberra, Australia: Murray Darling Basin Commission.Google Scholar
  41. MDBC. (1999). The salinity audit of the Murray Darling Basin: A 100-year perspective (39 pp.). Canberra: Murray Darling Basin Ministerial Council.Google Scholar
  42. Mues, C., Chapman, L., & Van Hilst, R. (1998). Survey of Landcare and land management practices (1992–93). Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.Google Scholar
  43. Munday, B. (2004). Great answers in search of the right questions. In A. Ridley, P. Feikema, S. Bennett, M. Rogers, R. Wilkinson, & J. Hirth (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference ‘Salinity solutions working with science and society’, 2–5 August 2004, Bendigo, Victoria (CD-ROM). Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  44. NLWRA. (2001). Australian Dryland salinity assessment 2000. Canberra: National Land and Water Resources Audit.Google Scholar
  45. Nulsen, R. A. (1991). Land degradation – the hydrological issues. In Proceedings of the international hydrology and water resource symposium, Perth, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
  46. Pannell, D. J. (2001a). Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45, 517–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pannell, D. J. (2001b). Economic dimensions of Landcare. Invited paper presented at the Western Australian State Landcare Conference, Partnerships and Diversity, Mandurah, Western Australia, 11–14 September 2001.Google Scholar
  48. Pannell, D. J. (2006a). Dryland salinity: New knowledge with big implications. Connections, Autumn, Available at
  49. Pannell, D. J. (2006b). Seeking more effective NRM policies. Available at∼dpannell/pd/pd0082.htm.
  50. Pannell, D. J., & Ewing, M. A. (2006). Managing secondary dryland salinity: Options and challenges. Agricultural Water Management, 80, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pannell, D. J., McFarlane, D. J., & Ferdowsian, R. (2001). Rethinking the externality issue for dryland salinity in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. PMSEIC. (1999). Dryland salinity and its impact on rural industries and their landscape. Occasional Paper No.1, Prime Minister’s Science Engineering and Innovation Council, Department of Industry Science and Resources, Canberra.Google Scholar
  53. Porter, W. M., & Wilson, I. R. (1984). Soil acidity in the eastern wheatbelt. Journal of Agriculture (West. Aust.), 25, 132–135.Google Scholar
  54. Prasad, R., & Kant, S. (2003). Institutions, forest management, and sustainable human development – experiences from India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 5, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. RMCG. (2006). Evaluation of sustainable agriculture outcomes from regional investment (NAP and NHT). Final Report to the Department of Environment and Heritage and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, prepared by RM Consulting Group with URS, Rural Directions, Griffin NRM and Mark Gardner & Associates, 39 pp. Downloadable at
  56. Rockloff, S. F. (2003). Organising for sustainable natural resource management representation, leadership and partnership at four spatial scales. PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia, 482 pp.Google Scholar
  57. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2002). Effective water governance. Draft GWP Background Paper for virtual dialogue, Stockholm, Global Water Partnership, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
  59. SKM. (2006). Evaluation of salinity outcomes of regional investment. Final report for the Department of Environment and Heritage and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, prepared by Sinclair Knight Merz, April 2006, 88 pp., Downloadable at
  60. SSC. (2000). Natural resource management in Australia: The salinity strategy 2000. Perth: State Salinity Council, Government of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  61. Tonts, M., & Jones, R. (1996). Rural restructuring and uneven development in the Western Australian wheatbelt. In G. Lawrence, K. Lyons, & S. Momtaz (Eds.), Social change in rural Australia (143 pp.). Rural Social and Economic Research Centre, Central Queensland University.Google Scholar
  62. Vanclay, F. (1992). The social context of farmers’ adoption of environmentally-sound farming practices. In G. Lawrence, F. Vanclay, & B. Furze (Eds.), Agriculture, environment and society (pp. 94–121). Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Vanclay, F. (2004). Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vanclay, F., & Lawrence, G. (1995). The environmental imperative: eco-social concerns for Australian Agriculture. Rockhampton, Queensland: Central Queensland University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Vanslembrouck, I., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Verbeke, W. (2002). Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agri-environmental measures. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, 489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallace, K. J. (2003). Confusing means with ends: A manager’s reflections on experience in agricultural landscapes of Western Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration, 4, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Watson, A. (2001). Dear taxpayer, send money. Connections – farm, food and resource issues, Summer 2001, Available at

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ross Kingwell
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Michele John
    • 1
  • Michael Robertson
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Agricultural & Resource EconomicsUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture and FoodSouth PerthAustralia
  3. 3.CSIROFloreat ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations