Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 179–192 | Cite as

A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development

Original paper

Abstract

A critical review of the multidisciplinary literature on sustainable development reveals a lack of a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding sustainable development and its complexities. A critical review shows that the definitions of sustainable development are vague; there is a lack of operative definitions and disagreement over what should be sustained; the concept is unclear in terms of emotional commitment; and it “remains a confused topic”, “fraught with contradictions”. This article aims to theoretically synthesize the interdisciplinary literature on sustainable development, and then identify the results by broad categories. Therefore, this article uses conceptual analysis, which reviews multidisciplinary literature on sustainable development, which recognizes patterns and similarities within the literature, then it synthesizes the patterns to different categories and independent concepts, where each concept has distinctive meanings and represents close ideas on sustainability. The analytical process elaborates seven concepts that together assemble the theoretical framework of ‘sustainable development’ and each concept represents distinctive meanings of the theoretical framework.

Keywords

Conceptual Framework Eco-form Equity Integrative Management Global Agenda Sustainable Development Utopianism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Acselrad, H. (1999). Sustainability and territoriality: Meaningful practices and material transformation. In: E. Becker, & Th. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: A cross- disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 37–68). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (2002). Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space & Polity, 6(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, R. N. (1997). National environmental policies: The United States. In: M. Jaenicke, & H. J. Weidner (Eds.), National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity building (pp. 25–43). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Andrew Dobson (1990). Green Political Thought: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Baeten, G. (2000). The tragedy of the highway: Empowerment, disempowerment and the politics of sustainability discourses and practices. European Planning Studies, 8(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beatley, T., & Manning, K. (1998). The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berke, P. R., & Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berke, P. R., & Kartez, J. (1995). Sustainable development as a guide to land use policy. Cambridge, MA: Research Paper, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  9. Bookchin, M. (1980). Toward an Ecological Society. New York and Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bookchin, M. (1982). The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. New Castle: Silver Book Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bookchin, M. (1989). Remaking Society. New York and Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  12. Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11(3), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyce, J. K., Klemer, A. R., Templet, P. H., & Willis, C. E. (1999). Power distribution, the environment, and public health: A state-level analysis. Ecological Economics, 29(1), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Callenbach, E. (1975). Ecotopia: The Notebooks and Reports of William Weston. Berkeley, CA: Banyan Tree Books.Google Scholar
  16. Collados, C., & Timpothy, D. P. (1999). Natural capital and quality of life: A model for evaluating the sustainability of alternative regional development paths. Ecological Economics, 30(3), 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. CE–Council of Europe. (1993). The European urban charter, standing conference of local and regional authorities of Europe, Council of Europe, Luxembourg, http://www.iclei.org/europractce/e-intl.htm.Google Scholar
  19. CSD–Commission on Sustainable Development. (2001). 9th Session. New York. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/decmake.htm.Google Scholar
  20. Dodds, H. S. (2000). Pathways and paradigms for sustaining human communities. In: Lawrence R. J. Sustaining human settlement: A challenge for the new millennium. (pp. 28–54). Great Britain: Urban International Press.Google Scholar
  21. Donella Meadows (1991). Global Citizen. Island Press.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, B. (1999). Sustainable architecture: European directives and building design. Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, B., & Turrent, D. (2000). Sustainable housing: Principles and practice. London and New York: E & FN Spon.Google Scholar
  24. England, R. (1998). Should we pursue measurement of the natural capital stock? Ecological Economics, 27(3), 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geisinger, A. (1999). Sustainable development and the domination of nature: Spreading the seed of the western ideology of nature. Environmental Affairs law Review, 27(1), 43–74.Google Scholar
  26. Geldrop, J., & Withagen, C. (2000). Natural capital and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geus, M. de (1999). Ecological utopias: Envisioning the sustainable society. Utrecht: International Books.Google Scholar
  28. Gow, D. (1992). Poverty and natural resources: Principles for environmental management and sustainable development. In: Environmental impact assessment review, 12(1/2), 49–65.Google Scholar
  29. Haughton, G. (1999). Environmental justice and the sustainable city. In: D. Satterthwaite (Ed.), Sustainable cities. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  30. Hawken P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  31. Healey, P., & Shaw, T. (1993). Planners, plans and sustainable development. Regional Studies, 27(8), 769–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hinterberger, F., Luks, F., & Schmid, B. (1997). Methods: Material flows vs. ‘natural capital’: What makes an economy sustainable? Ecological Economics, 23, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jabareen, Y. (2004). A knowledge map for describing variegated and conflict domains of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(4), 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacobs, M. (1991). The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kohn, J., Gowdy, J., & Van der Straaten, J. (Eds.) (2001). Sustainability in Action: Sectoral and Regional Case Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Kothari, R. (1990). Environment, technology and ethics. In: J. R. Engel & J. G. Engel (Eds.), Ethics of Environment and Development—Global Challenge, International Response. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. pp. 27–49.Google Scholar
  37. Lyle, J. T. (1985). Designing for human ecosystems: Landscape, land use, and natural resources. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  38. Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992) Beyond the limits. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  40. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  41. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Mishler, E. G. (1990) Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–441.Google Scholar
  43. Mozaffar, Q. (2001). Sustainable development: Concepts and rankings. Journal of Development Studies, 3, 134–161.Google Scholar
  44. Neumayer, E. (2001). The human development index and sustainability. A constructive proposal, Ecological Economics, 39(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Pearce, D., Barbier, E., & Markandya, A. (1990). Sustainable development: Economics and environment in the third world. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Pearce, D., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Qizilbash, M. (1996). Capabilities, Well-Being and Human Development: A Survey. Journal of Development Studies, 33(2), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reboratti, C. E. (1999). Territory, scale and sustainable development. In: E. Becker, & Th. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 207–222). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  50. Redclift, M. R. (1987). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  51. Redclift, M. R. (1993). Sustainable development: Concepts, contradictions, and conflicts. In: P. Allen (Ed.), Food for the future: Conditions and contradictions of sustainability. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Redclift, M. R. (1994). Sustainable development: Economics and the environment. In: Strategies for sustainable development: Local agendas for the southern hemisphere. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Repetto, R. (Ed.) (1985). The global possible: Resources, development, and the new century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Robinson, J., & Tinker, J. (1998). Reconciling ecological, economic, and social imperatives, In: J. Schnurr, & S. Holtz (Eds.) The cornerstone of development: Integrating environmental, social, and economic policies (pp. 9–43). Ottawa: IDRC-International Development Research Center, and Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Roseland, M. (2000) Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning, 54(2), 73–132.Google Scholar
  56. Sachs, W. (1993). Global ecology and the shadow of development. In: W. Sachs (Ed.), Global ecology. A new arena of polital conflict (pp. 3–20). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  57. Sachs, W. (1999). Planet dialectics: Exploring in environment & development. Fernwood Publishing, Witwatersrand University Press, Zed Books.Google Scholar
  58. Sattherwaite, D. (1996). For better living. Down to Earth, 31, 31–35.Google Scholar
  59. Scrugge, P. (1993). Definitions and principles (Chap. 1). In: S. Park (Ed.), Guidelines for state level sustainable development, Chapel Hill: Center for Policy Alternatives and Environmental Resource Program, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  60. Solow, R. (1991). Sustainability: An economist’s perspective. The Eighteenth J. Seward Johnson Lecture. Woods Hole, MA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.Google Scholar
  61. Solow R. (1992) An almost practical step toward sustainability. Nobel Laureate in Economic Science (MIT).Google Scholar
  62. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of quantitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Stymne, S., & Jackson, T. (2000). Intra-generational equity and sustainable welfare: A time series analysis for the UK and Sweden. Ecological Economics, 33(2), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thayer, R. Jr. (1994). Gray world, green heart: Technology, nature, and sustainable landscape. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  65. The Earth Charter. (2001). www.earthcharterusa.org; see also: www.earthcharter.org/wssd/summit_report.doc.Google Scholar
  66. UNCED – United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). www.ciesin.org/TG/P1/TREATY/unced.htmlGoogle Scholar
  67. UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/ resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.Google Scholar
  68. UNDP – United Nations Development Programme. (2002). Human development report 2002: Deepening democracy in a fragmented world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Van der Ryn, S., & Calthorpe, P. (1991). Sustainable communities: A new design synthesis for cities, suburbs, and towns. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  70. Van der Ryn, S., & Cowan, S. (1995). Ecological design. Island Press.Google Scholar
  71. Villanueva, C. (1997). Community development and the futures of sustainable communities in the Philippines. In: Y. Kaoru (Ed.), Sustainable global community in the information age: Vision from future studies. Praeger Studies on the 21st Century: Praeger, CT.Google Scholar
  72. WCED. (1987). Our common future. The brundtland report, world commission for environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. WSSD – World Summit on Sustainable Development. (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban Studies and PlanningMIT – Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations