Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 453–471 | Cite as

Analysis of availability and accessibility of hydrogen production: An approach to a sustainable energy system using methane hydrate resources

  • Ryunosuke Kikuchi


It is considered that use of hydrogen as an energy source may contribute to environmental improvement and provide an alternative energy system. Moreover, it is anticipated that hydrogen will be in great demand in the near future for use in such vehicles as fuel cell-based cars. Research and development of a number of advanced methods of hydrogen production (OTEC, water photolysis using a semiconductor, a municipal waste gasification—smelting system, etc.) is currently under way.

A comparison of different hydrogen-rich fuels in this paper shows that methane is advantageous for hydrogen production from the viewpoint of energy efficiency as measured by thermodynamic analysis. This paper therefore proposes combining existing technology for hydrogen production with an unconventional methane source in order to facilitate the realization of a hydrogen energy system: i.e., this paper proposes combining the process of steam reforming, which is commercialized worldwide, with use of untouched natural gas hydrate (NGH) resources. Gas hydrate deposits, which are distributed worldwide, hold great amounts of methane gas and have hardly been touched. This paper presents the economic parameters of NGH development and discusses the concept of devising useful applications of NGHs, with consideration given to (1) independence from current fossil fuels; (2) energy transport using the hydrate system; (3) CO2 sequestration — replacement of methane hydrate with CO2 hydrate in the submarine layer and (4) improvement of current steam reforming of methane by CO2 reuse and zeolite application. This paper thus proposes a new solution that will make a key contribution to the systematic development of a new sustainable energy structure.

Key words

alternative energy fuel cell hydrogen methane hydrate sustainable development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avery, W.: 2002, ‘Ocean-Thermal Energy Conversion’, Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Vol. 11, 3rd edn, San Diego, Academic Press, pp. 123–160.Google Scholar
  2. Breakthrough Technologies Institute: http://www.fuelcells.org/fcfaqs.html. Google Scholar
  3. British Petroleum p.l.c.: 2002, BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2002, London, BP Distribution Services, pp. 22–29.Google Scholar
  4. Collett, T. and Ginsburg, D.: 1997, ‘Gas hydrates in the Messoyakha gas field of the West Siberian Basin — a re-examination of the geologic evidence’, International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering 8(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
  5. Collett, T.: 2000, ‘Natural gas hydrates: Resources of the 21st Century?’, Status Report of the EMD Meeting, New Orleans, Energy Minerals Division (American Association of Petroleum Geologists), 18–19 November, unpaginated.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Trade and Industry: 1995, Energy Projections for the UK: Energy Use and Energy-Related Emissions of Carbon Dioxide in the UK, 1995–2020, Energy paper 65, London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M: 1995, Institutional Frameworks for Electricity Supply to Rural Communities, Rondebosch, Energy & Development Research Center, p. 8.Google Scholar
  8. Dooley, J.: 1999, Energy R&D in Japan, Report No. PNNL-12214, Richland, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  9. Electric Power Development Co.: 1995, Conceptual Design of the Total for World Energy Network, Report No. NEDO-WE-NET-9431, Tokyo, New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, Chapter 1.3.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission: 1996, European Energy to 2020, Report No. SEC (95) 2283, Luxembourg, European Communities, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  11. European Environmental Agency: 2000, Transport — Environmental Signals 2000, Copenhagen, European Communities, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  12. Euro-Quebec Hydro-Hydrogen Pilot Project: 1993, Investigation on Safety, Regulation and Acceptability of Hydrogen, Final report No. 190, Luxembourg, Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  13. Gudmundsson, J. and Borrehaug, A.: 1996, ‘Frozen hydrate for transport of natural gas’, Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Natural Gas Hydrates, Toulouse, Organizing Committee PROGEP-NGH’96, 2–6 June, pp. 415–421.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, R., Saint-just, J., Asaoka, T. and Thatcher, D.: 2001, ‘The potential for natural gas to contribute to a hydrogen energy future’, Proceedings of the World Energy Council 18th Congress, Buenos Aires, World Energy Council, 21–25 October, Paper No. DS3.Google Scholar
  15. Hawaii National Institute: 2001, The 1st Workshop on the International Committee on Methane Hydrates, Final Report, Honolulu, University of Hawaii, Chapter II.Google Scholar
  16. Honda, K. and Fujishima, A.: 1972, ‘Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode’, Nature 238, 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ichikawa, M.: 1998, ‘Catalytic dehydroaromatization of methane with CO/CO2 towards benzene and naphthalene on bimetallic Mo/zeolite catalysts, bifunctional catalysis and dynamic mechanism’, Studies of Surface Catalysis 119, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institute of Applied Energy: 2000. Phase II for Task-1 System Analysis: World Energy Network, Report No. NEDO-WE-NET-0001/06, Tokyo, New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, Chapters 3 and 4.Google Scholar
  19. International Fertilizer Development Center: 1997, ‘Worldwide Ammonia Capacity Listing by Plant’, Fertilizer Situation Report FSR-10. Alabama, ICDC Publication Center, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Ito, T.: 1999, ‘Technologies and catalysts of hydrogen generation for fuel cells’, Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy 78(871), 911–920.Google Scholar
  21. Khaselev, O. and Turner, J. 1998, ‘A monolithic photovoltaic-photochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting’, Science 280, 425–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kvenvolden, A.: 1993. ‘Gas hydrates as a potential energy resource — A review of their methane content’, in G. Howell (ed.), The Future of Energy Gases: Professional Paper 1570, Reston, US Geological Survey, pp. 555–561.Google Scholar
  23. Lomax, D., James, B., Baum, G. and Thomas, C.: 1997. ‘ Detail Manufacturing Cost Estimates for PEM Fuel Cells for Light Duty Vehicles’, Directed Technologies, Inc., Arlington.Google Scholar
  24. MacDonald, T.: 1990, ‘The future of methane as an energy resource’, Annual Review of Energy 15, 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumoto, R., Takeda, Y. and Wasada H.: 2001, ‘Exploitation of margin gas hydrates in Nankai Trough’, CD-ROM Proceedings of the AAPG National Meeting, Denver, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 3–6 June, CD-ROM 1.Google Scholar
  26. Master, D., Root, D. and Attanasi, E.: 1991, ‘Resource constraints in petroleum production potential’, Science 253, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murase, M.: 1995, ‘R&D for world energy network’, Summary of the International Hydrogen & Clean Energy Symposium, Tokyo, Asian Technical Information Program, 6–8 February, Paper No. ATIP95-63.Google Scholar
  28. National Institute for Resources and Environment: 1996, Development of Methane Hydrate, Advisory Board Report, Tsukuba, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan, Chapters 4–6.Google Scholar
  29. National Petroleum Council: 1992, The Potential for Natural Gas in the United States, Washington D.C., The National Petroleum Council, Vols. I and II.Google Scholar
  30. Nordic Council of Ministers: 1986. ‘Europe’s air — Europe’s environment’, Report of the Committee for Environmental Affairs, Stockholm, the Nordic Council of Ministers, pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
  31. Office of Fossil Energy: 1999, National Methane Hydrate Multi-Year R&D Program Plan, Washington D.C., US Department of Energy, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  32. Ohara, T., Dallimore, S. and Fercho, E.: 1999, ‘Drilling operations’, in S. Dallimore, T. Uchida and T. Collet (eds.), JAPAN/JNOC/GSCMallik2L-38 Gas Hydrate Research Well, Mackenzie Delta, Vancouver, Geological Survey of Canada, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
  33. Ohiji, Y.: 2000, ‘The present situation and the future of alternative fuels’, Proceedings of the Alternative Fuel Technology for Automobile Symposium, Tokyo, Organizing Committee, 29–30 May, pp. 28–46.Google Scholar
  34. Ogden, J.: 2001, Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production, Technical report, Princeton, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  35. Ormerod, B. (ed.): 1996, Ocean Storage of Carbon Dioxide, Report of Workshop 2 — Environmental Impact, Cheltenham, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Program, p. 131.Google Scholar
  36. Shimada T.: 2000, ‘Automobiles and environmental impact’, Car Technology 54(12), 16–19.Google Scholar
  37. Sloan, E.: 1997, Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, New York, Marcel Dekker Inc., Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  38. Sperling, D. and Lipman, T.: 2000, International Assessment of Electric-Drive Vehicles — Policies, Markets and Technologies, Report No. KFB-2000/30, The Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  39. Sumitomo Metals, 2002: Annual Report — Onward and Upward, Report No. A1-202, Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  40. Swaminathan, A. and Sen, R.: 1997, Cost Analysis of Energy Storage for Electric Utility Applications, Report No. SAND97-0443, New Mexico, Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
  41. Terasaki, T.: 1999, ‘Natural gas from unconventional sources’, in Y. Okamoto (ed.), Natural Gas, Tokyo, Japan Institute of Energy, chapter 1.Google Scholar
  42. Tomer, B., Guthrie, H. and Mroz, T.: 2001, ‘A collaborative approach to methane hydrate research and development activities’, Proceedings of the 2001 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, OTC Program Committee, 30 April–3 May, Paper No. 13038.Google Scholar
  43. Tsuji, Y., Furunani, S. and Kanamori, K.: 1998, ‘Exploratory surveys for evaluation of methane hydrates in Nankai Trough area, offshore central Japan’, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Methane Hydrates Resources in the Near Future, Chiba, Japan National Oil Cooperation, 20–22 October, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
  44. Uehara, H.: 1998, ‘The present status and future of ocean thermal energy conversion’, Solar Energy 16, 217–231.Google Scholar
  45. Uehara, H., Dilao, C. and Nakaoka, T.: 1988, ‘Conceptual design of ocean thermal energy conversion power plant in the Philippines’, Solar Energy 41(5), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. US Department of Energy: http://www.fe.doe.gov/oil_gas/methanehydrates. Google Scholar
  47. US Environmental Protection Agency: 1994, Methanol Basics, Technical report EPA 400/F/92/009, Washington D.C., US Environmental Protection Agency, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  48. Watanabe, S.: 1999, ‘Clean and efficient fuel cell vehicles’, Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy 78 (871), 898–905.Google Scholar
  49. Yamada, K.: 1999, ‘Methane hydrate’, Valqua Review 43(10), 10–15Google Scholar
  50. Yamamoto, T., Isaka, K, Sato, H. Matsukura, Y. and Ishida, H.: 2000, ‘Gasification and smelting system using oxygen blowing for municipal waste’, ISIJ International 40(3), 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zeolyst International: http://www.zeolyst.com.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryunosuke Kikuchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Basic Science and EnvironmentESAC/Polytechnic Institute of CoimbraBencantaPortugal

Personalised recommendations