Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 69–84 | Cite as

Linking Conservation and Development: An Analysis of Local People’s Attitude Towards Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal

  • Ram K. ShresthaEmail author
  • Janaki R. R. Alavalapati


Factors influencing local people’s attitudes towards conservation of the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve (KTWR) are analyzed using an ordered logit model. The results indicate that households living closer to the KTWR are more likely to reveal negative attitude towards conservation. Similarly, respondents from larger households tend to show negative conservation attitude. Educated respondents and farmers are likely to demonstrate a positive conservation attitude. The results consistently show that households with poor socioeconomic status and greater dependence on the KTWR for firewood, fodder, and raw materials are likely to possess a more negative attitude towards conservation. Poor households may not necessarily be less concerned about conservation, although institutional settings and abject poverty near protected areas appear to affect their attitudes. Sustainable management of protected areas and local support for natural resource conservation would require socioeconomic development.


conservation attitude Nepal ordered logit model protected area management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrett, C.B., Arcese, P. 1995‘Are Integrated Conservation-Development Projects (ICDPs) Sustainable? on the conservation of large mammals in sub-Saharan Africa’World Development2310731084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolks, S.M., Evans, D., Polinard, J.L., Wrinkle, R.D. 2000‘Core beliefs and abortion attitudes: A look at Latinos’Social Science Quarterly81253260Google Scholar
  3. Braatz, S., Davis, G., Shen, S., Rees, C. 1992Conserving Biological Diversity: A Strategy for Protected Areas in the Asia-Pacific RegionThe World BankWashington, D.CWorld Bank Technical Paper No 193Google Scholar
  4. Brown, K. 1998‘The political ecology of biodiversity, conservation and development in Nepal’s Terai: confused meanings, means and ends’Ecological Economics247387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Souza, G., Cyphers, D. and Phillips, T.: 1993 ‘Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices’, Agricultural and Resources Economics Review (October), 159–165Google Scholar
  6. Gale, R.J.P. 1991‘Environment and development: Attitudinal impediments to policy integration’Environmental Conservation18228236Google Scholar
  7. Greene, W.H. 1997Econometric AnalysisPrentice HallNew JerseyThird Edition ed.Google Scholar
  8. Greene, W.H. 1998LIMDEP Version 7.0Econometric Software, IncNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hackel, J.D. 1998‘Community conservation and the future of Africa’s wildlife’Conservation Biology13726734Google Scholar
  10. Haynes, J.S. 1998‘Involving communities in managing protected areas: contrasting initiative in Nepal and Britain’PARKS85461Google Scholar
  11. Heinen, J.T. 1993‘Park – people relations in Koshi Tappu wildlife reserve, Nepal’Environmental Conservation202534Google Scholar
  12. Heinen, J.T., Mehta, J.N. 2000‘Emerging issues in legal and procedural aspects of buffer zone management with case studies from Nepal’Journal of Environment and Development94567Google Scholar
  13. HMG1994Parks and People, Project DocumentHis Majesty’s Government of Nepal and United Nations Development ProgrammeKathmanduGoogle Scholar
  14. HMG1991National Population Census, Preliminary Results, Central Bureau of StatisticsNational Planning Commission Secretariat, HMG NepalKathmanduGoogle Scholar
  15. Infield, M., Namara, A. 2001‘Community attitudes and Behavior towards conservation: And assessment of a community conservation program around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda’Oryx354860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IUCN1993Parks for Life: Report of the IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected AreasIUCN-The World Conservation UnionGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. IUCN: 2000, ‘Protected Areas: Benefits Beyond Boundaries, WCPA in Action’, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, World Commission on Protected Areas, Gland:
  18. Jones, T. 1993A Dictionary of Wetlands of International Importance4Asian and Oceania, Ramsar Convention BureauGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKinnon, J., MacKinnon, G.C., Thorsell, J. 1986Managing protected areas in the tropicsIUCNGlandGoogle Scholar
  20. MacKinnon, K. 2001‘Editorial’PARKS1115Google Scholar
  21. Maddala, G.S. 1999‘Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics ’Cambridge University PressCambridgeEconometric Society Monographs No. 3Google Scholar
  22. Maslow, A.H. 1954Motivation and PersonalityHarper and RowNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Masozera, M., Alavalapati, J.R.R., Jacobson, S. and Shrestha, R.K.: 2005, ‘Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe forest reserve, Rwanda, Rwanda’, Forest Policy and Economics (In press)Google Scholar
  24. Mehta, J.N., Heinen, J.T. 2001‘Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitude among locals? An empirical study from Nepal’Environmental Management28165177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menard, S. 1995Applied Logistic Regression AnalysisSage PublicationThousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishra, H.R. 1982‘Balancing human needs and conservation in Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park’Ambio11246251Google Scholar
  27. Nepal, S.K., Weber, K.E. 1995‘Prospects of coexistence: Wildlife and local people’Ambio24238245Google Scholar
  28. Poteete, A.R. and Ostrom, E.: ‘Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management’, Development and Change 35(3), 435–461Google Scholar
  29. Redford, K.H., Sanderson, S.E. 2000‘Extracting humans from nature’Conservation Biology1413621364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Redford, K.H., Brandon, K., Sanderson, S.E. 1998Holding groundBrandon, K.Redford, K.H.Sanderson, S.E. eds. Parks in Perils: People Politics and Protected AreasIsland PressWashington D.CGoogle Scholar
  31. Sah, J.P. 1993Wetland Vegetation and Its Management: A Case Study in Koshi Tappu Region, NepalNatural Resource Program, Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokUnpublished M.Sc. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  32. Salafsky, N., Wollenberg, E. 2000‘Linking livelihoods and conservation: A conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity’World Development2814211438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartzman, S., Moreira, A., Nepstad, D. 2000‘Rethinking tropical forest conservation: Perils in parks’Conservation Biology1413521357Google Scholar
  34. Sharma, U.R., Shaw, W.W. 1993‘Role of Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park in meeting the grazing and fodder needs of local people’Environmental Conservation2013942Google Scholar
  35. Shrestha, R.K. 1994Conservation of Wildlife Reserve Resources Accommodating Livestock Rearing in Koshi Tappu Region, NepalNatural Resource Program, Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokUnpublished M.Sc. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh, G.R.: 1994, ‘Summary Status of Nepal’s Ramsar Site’, in Bhandari, B., Shrestha, T.B. and McEachern, J. (eds.), Safeguarding Wetlands in Nepal: Proceedings of the National Workshop on Wetlands Management in Nepal, IUCN Nepal, Kathmandu, pp. 115–118Google Scholar
  37. Straede, S., Helles, F. 2000‘Park-people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: Buying time at high cost?’Environmental Conservation27368381Google Scholar
  38. Shyamsundar, P., Kramer, R.A. 1996‘Tropical forest protection: An empirical analysis of the costs borne by local people’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management31129144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sudarmadi, S., Suzuki, S., Kawada, T., Netti, H., Soemantri, S., Tugaswati, A. 2001‘A Survey of perception, knowledge, awareness, and attitude in regard to environmental problems in a sample of two different social groups in Jakarta, Indonesia’Environment, Development and Sustainability3169183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Terborgh, J. 2000‘The fate of tropical forests: A matter of stewardship’Conservation Biology1413581361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiwari, G.: 2000, ‘Entry Fee Hike by 620% Hits Koshi Tappu Tourism’, Kathmandu Post, November 27,2000, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  42. UNCED: 1992, `Agenda 21: Program of Action for Sustainable Development’, The final text of agreements negotiated by Governments of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 3–14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. United NationsGoogle Scholar
  43. Wainwright, C., Wehrmeyer, W. 1998‘Success in integrating conservation and development? a study from Zambia’World Development26933944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wells, M. 1992‘Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty: Mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them’Ambio22237243Google Scholar
  45. Wells, M., Brandon, K., Hannah, L. 1992People and parks – linking protected area management with local communitiesThe World Bank/WWF/USAIDWashington, D.CGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations